直肠灌肠粪便菌群移植改善代谢综合征患者短期胰岛素抵抗:一项随机对照试验。

IF 7.9 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Setthachai Piwchan, Natsuda Aumpan, Soonthorn Chonprasertsuk, Bubpha Pornthisarn, Sith Siramolpiwat, Patommatat Bhanthumkomol, Pongjarat Nunanan, Navapan Issariyakulkarn, Arti Wongcha-Um, Muhammad Miftahussurur, Varocha Mahachai, Yoshio Yamaoka, Ratha-Korn Vilaichone
{"title":"直肠灌肠粪便菌群移植改善代谢综合征患者短期胰岛素抵抗:一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Setthachai Piwchan, Natsuda Aumpan, Soonthorn Chonprasertsuk, Bubpha Pornthisarn, Sith Siramolpiwat, Patommatat Bhanthumkomol, Pongjarat Nunanan, Navapan Issariyakulkarn, Arti Wongcha-Um, Muhammad Miftahussurur, Varocha Mahachai, Yoshio Yamaoka, Ratha-Korn Vilaichone","doi":"10.7570/jomes25014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The gut microbiota plays a vital role in various physiological processes, including metabolism. Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) involves transferring fecal matter from a healthy donor to rebalance a patient's intestinal dysbiosis. The impact of FMT on metabolic syndrome (MetS) is subject to debate. This study assesses the effects of FMT on MetS when administered by rectal enema.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a double-blind, randomized controlled trial, subjects with MetS were assigned to receive either FMT (n=8) or a sham intervention (n=10) via rectal enema. Participants were followed at 6 and 12 weeks. The primary outcome was changes in the homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR). Secondary outcomes included fasting blood glucose (FBG), body mass index (BMI), inflammatory markers, and hepatic steatosis. The mean adjusted difference (MAD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) between groups were reported as treatment effects using a linear marginal model for repeated measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included patients with a mean age of 50.4±10.7 years. Baseline BMI and HOMA-IR were similar between groups. Over 6 weeks, FMT significantly improved HOMA-IR (MAD, -1.63; 95% CI, -2.63 to -0.64; <i>P</i>=0.001). The FMT group also showed improvements in serum FBG and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein compared with levels in the sham group (<i>P</i>=0.044 and <i>P</i>=0.025, respectively). However, no significant changes in MetS-associated variables or liver steatosis were evident at 12 weeks. Stool microbiota analysis revealed a reduced relative abundance of <i>Desulfovibrio, Bacteroides</i>, and <i>Parabacteroides</i> after FMT.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>FMT by rectal enema produced favorable changes in IR in patients with MetS. FMT may be an effective treatment for patients with metabolism-related diseases. Further research into the long-term benefits of the procedure is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":45386,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Obesity & Metabolic Syndrome","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fecal Microbiota Transplantation by Rectal Enema Improves Short-Term Insulin Resistance in Metabolic Syndrome: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Setthachai Piwchan, Natsuda Aumpan, Soonthorn Chonprasertsuk, Bubpha Pornthisarn, Sith Siramolpiwat, Patommatat Bhanthumkomol, Pongjarat Nunanan, Navapan Issariyakulkarn, Arti Wongcha-Um, Muhammad Miftahussurur, Varocha Mahachai, Yoshio Yamaoka, Ratha-Korn Vilaichone\",\"doi\":\"10.7570/jomes25014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The gut microbiota plays a vital role in various physiological processes, including metabolism. Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) involves transferring fecal matter from a healthy donor to rebalance a patient's intestinal dysbiosis. The impact of FMT on metabolic syndrome (MetS) is subject to debate. This study assesses the effects of FMT on MetS when administered by rectal enema.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a double-blind, randomized controlled trial, subjects with MetS were assigned to receive either FMT (n=8) or a sham intervention (n=10) via rectal enema. Participants were followed at 6 and 12 weeks. The primary outcome was changes in the homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR). Secondary outcomes included fasting blood glucose (FBG), body mass index (BMI), inflammatory markers, and hepatic steatosis. The mean adjusted difference (MAD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) between groups were reported as treatment effects using a linear marginal model for repeated measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included patients with a mean age of 50.4±10.7 years. Baseline BMI and HOMA-IR were similar between groups. Over 6 weeks, FMT significantly improved HOMA-IR (MAD, -1.63; 95% CI, -2.63 to -0.64; <i>P</i>=0.001). The FMT group also showed improvements in serum FBG and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein compared with levels in the sham group (<i>P</i>=0.044 and <i>P</i>=0.025, respectively). However, no significant changes in MetS-associated variables or liver steatosis were evident at 12 weeks. Stool microbiota analysis revealed a reduced relative abundance of <i>Desulfovibrio, Bacteroides</i>, and <i>Parabacteroides</i> after FMT.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>FMT by rectal enema produced favorable changes in IR in patients with MetS. FMT may be an effective treatment for patients with metabolism-related diseases. Further research into the long-term benefits of the procedure is warranted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45386,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Obesity & Metabolic Syndrome\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Obesity & Metabolic Syndrome\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7570/jomes25014\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Obesity & Metabolic Syndrome","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7570/jomes25014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:肠道微生物群在包括代谢在内的各种生理过程中起着至关重要的作用。粪便微生物群移植(FMT)涉及从健康供体转移粪便物质以重新平衡患者的肠道生态失调。FMT对代谢综合征(MetS)的影响一直存在争议。本研究评估了FMT在直肠灌肠时对MetS的影响。方法:在一项双盲、随机对照试验中,met患者被分配接受FMT (n=8)或通过直肠灌肠进行假干预(n=10)。参与者分别在第6周和第12周接受随访。主要结局是胰岛素抵抗的稳态模型评估(HOMA-IR)的变化。次要结局包括空腹血糖(FBG)、体重指数(BMI)、炎症标志物和肝脂肪变性。使用重复测量的线性边际模型报告各组间的平均校正差(MAD)和95%置信区间(CI)作为治疗效果。结果:入组患者平均年龄50.4±10.7岁。两组间基线BMI和HOMA-IR相似。6周后,FMT显著改善HOMA-IR (MAD, -1.63; 95% CI, -2.63至-0.64;P=0.001)。与假手术组相比,FMT组血清FBG和高敏c反应蛋白水平也有所改善(P=0.044和P=0.025)。然而,在12周时,met相关变量或肝脏脂肪变性没有明显变化。粪便微生物群分析显示,FMT后,Desulfovibrio, Bacteroides和parabobacteroides的相对丰度降低。结论:经直肠灌肠的FMT对met患者IR有良好的改变。FMT可能是治疗代谢相关疾病的有效方法。有必要对该手术的长期益处进行进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fecal Microbiota Transplantation by Rectal Enema Improves Short-Term Insulin Resistance in Metabolic Syndrome: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background: The gut microbiota plays a vital role in various physiological processes, including metabolism. Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) involves transferring fecal matter from a healthy donor to rebalance a patient's intestinal dysbiosis. The impact of FMT on metabolic syndrome (MetS) is subject to debate. This study assesses the effects of FMT on MetS when administered by rectal enema.

Methods: In a double-blind, randomized controlled trial, subjects with MetS were assigned to receive either FMT (n=8) or a sham intervention (n=10) via rectal enema. Participants were followed at 6 and 12 weeks. The primary outcome was changes in the homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR). Secondary outcomes included fasting blood glucose (FBG), body mass index (BMI), inflammatory markers, and hepatic steatosis. The mean adjusted difference (MAD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) between groups were reported as treatment effects using a linear marginal model for repeated measures.

Results: The study included patients with a mean age of 50.4±10.7 years. Baseline BMI and HOMA-IR were similar between groups. Over 6 weeks, FMT significantly improved HOMA-IR (MAD, -1.63; 95% CI, -2.63 to -0.64; P=0.001). The FMT group also showed improvements in serum FBG and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein compared with levels in the sham group (P=0.044 and P=0.025, respectively). However, no significant changes in MetS-associated variables or liver steatosis were evident at 12 weeks. Stool microbiota analysis revealed a reduced relative abundance of Desulfovibrio, Bacteroides, and Parabacteroides after FMT.

Conclusion: FMT by rectal enema produced favorable changes in IR in patients with MetS. FMT may be an effective treatment for patients with metabolism-related diseases. Further research into the long-term benefits of the procedure is warranted.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Obesity & Metabolic Syndrome
Journal of Obesity & Metabolic Syndrome ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
9.60%
发文量
39
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal was launched in 1992 and diverse studies on obesity have been published under the title of Journal of Korean Society for the Study of Obesity until 2004. Since 2017, volume 26, the title is now the Journal of Obesity & Metabolic Syndrome (pISSN 2508-6235, eISSN 2508-7576). The journal is published quarterly on March 30th, June 30th, September 30th and December 30th. The official title of the journal is now "Journal of Obesity & Metabolic Syndrome" and the abbreviated title is "J Obes Metab Syndr". Index words from medical subject headings (MeSH) list of Index Medicus are included in each article to facilitate article search. Some or all of the articles of this journal are included in the index of PubMed, PubMed Central, Scopus, Embase, DOAJ, Ebsco, KCI, KoreaMed, KoMCI, Science Central, Crossref Metadata Search, Google Scholar, and Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信