支气管超声引导下低温活检诊断胸部疾病的表现及其在非小细胞肺癌新一代测序中的作用。

IF 2.1 Q3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Pulmonary Medicine Pub Date : 2025-08-28 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1155/pm/3522554
Chun Ian Soo, Sze Shyang Kho, Wai Ling Leong, Shinye Eng, Diana Bee-Lan Ong, Seow Fan Chiew, Tak Kuan Chow, Hazwan Amzar Khairul Annuar, Chee Kuan Wong, Chong Kin Liam
{"title":"支气管超声引导下低温活检诊断胸部疾病的表现及其在非小细胞肺癌新一代测序中的作用。","authors":"Chun Ian Soo, Sze Shyang Kho, Wai Ling Leong, Shinye Eng, Diana Bee-Lan Ong, Seow Fan Chiew, Tak Kuan Chow, Hazwan Amzar Khairul Annuar, Chee Kuan Wong, Chong Kin Liam","doi":"10.1155/pm/3522554","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is an established procedure for diagnosing thoracic diseases and staging of lung cancers. However, some limitations of cytology specimens from EBUS-TBNA include small sample size, low tumour cellularity, necrosis and specimen contamination. Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial mediastinal cryobiopsy (EBUS-TBMC) is a promising alternative that provides a larger histology specimen which may improve diagnostic accuracy and molecular testing. This study is aimed at evaluating the benefits of EBUS-TBMC over EBUS-TBNA, focusing on improving next-generation sequencing (NGS) success rates, and assessing its efficacy and safety in a real-world setting. <b>Methods:</b> Data from 203 patients (99 underwent EBUS-TBNA and 104 underwent EBUS-TBMC) were retrospectively traced and analysed using descriptive statistics. <b>Results:</b> The overall diagnostic yield was significantly higher for EBUS-TBMC (90.38%) than that for EBUS-TBNA (67.68%; <i>p</i> < 0.001). For heterogeneous lesions, the diagnostic yield was 92.31% for EBUS-TBMC and 69.44% for EBUS-TBNA (<i>p</i> = 0.011). For non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), EBUS-TBMC specimens demonstrated higher overall tumour cellularity (65% vs. 30%; <i>p</i> < 0.001) and better success in detecting driver alterations through NGS (85.36% vs. 61.90%; <i>p</i> = 0.035). The median procedure duration was shorter for EBUS-TBMC (22 vs. 32 min; <i>p</i> < 0.001), and the complication rates were comparable between the two techniques. These findings suggest that EBUS-TBMC offers additional diagnostic advantages over EBUS-TBNA for heterogeneous lesions and significantly facilitates the acquisition of cell-rich specimens for NGS testing. <b>Conclusion:</b> EBUS-TBMC increases the overall diagnostic yield of mediastinal diseases. EBUS-TBMC provides cell-rich histology specimens with high tumour content, facilitating NGS testing in the management of NSCLC.</p>","PeriodicalId":46434,"journal":{"name":"Pulmonary Medicine","volume":"2025 ","pages":"3522554"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12411052/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance of Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Cryobiopsy in Diagnosing Thoracic Disorders and Its Role in Next-Generation Sequencing for Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Chun Ian Soo, Sze Shyang Kho, Wai Ling Leong, Shinye Eng, Diana Bee-Lan Ong, Seow Fan Chiew, Tak Kuan Chow, Hazwan Amzar Khairul Annuar, Chee Kuan Wong, Chong Kin Liam\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/pm/3522554\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is an established procedure for diagnosing thoracic diseases and staging of lung cancers. However, some limitations of cytology specimens from EBUS-TBNA include small sample size, low tumour cellularity, necrosis and specimen contamination. Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial mediastinal cryobiopsy (EBUS-TBMC) is a promising alternative that provides a larger histology specimen which may improve diagnostic accuracy and molecular testing. This study is aimed at evaluating the benefits of EBUS-TBMC over EBUS-TBNA, focusing on improving next-generation sequencing (NGS) success rates, and assessing its efficacy and safety in a real-world setting. <b>Methods:</b> Data from 203 patients (99 underwent EBUS-TBNA and 104 underwent EBUS-TBMC) were retrospectively traced and analysed using descriptive statistics. <b>Results:</b> The overall diagnostic yield was significantly higher for EBUS-TBMC (90.38%) than that for EBUS-TBNA (67.68%; <i>p</i> < 0.001). For heterogeneous lesions, the diagnostic yield was 92.31% for EBUS-TBMC and 69.44% for EBUS-TBNA (<i>p</i> = 0.011). For non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), EBUS-TBMC specimens demonstrated higher overall tumour cellularity (65% vs. 30%; <i>p</i> < 0.001) and better success in detecting driver alterations through NGS (85.36% vs. 61.90%; <i>p</i> = 0.035). The median procedure duration was shorter for EBUS-TBMC (22 vs. 32 min; <i>p</i> < 0.001), and the complication rates were comparable between the two techniques. These findings suggest that EBUS-TBMC offers additional diagnostic advantages over EBUS-TBNA for heterogeneous lesions and significantly facilitates the acquisition of cell-rich specimens for NGS testing. <b>Conclusion:</b> EBUS-TBMC increases the overall diagnostic yield of mediastinal diseases. EBUS-TBMC provides cell-rich histology specimens with high tumour content, facilitating NGS testing in the management of NSCLC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46434,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pulmonary Medicine\",\"volume\":\"2025 \",\"pages\":\"3522554\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12411052/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pulmonary Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/pm/3522554\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pulmonary Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/pm/3522554","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:支气管超声引导下经支气管穿刺(EBUS-TBNA)是诊断胸部疾病和肺癌分期的既定程序。然而,EBUS-TBNA细胞学标本的一些局限性包括样本量小、肿瘤细胞密度低、坏死和标本污染。超声引导下的支气管纵隔低温活检(EBUS-TBMC)是一种很有前途的替代方法,它提供了更大的组织学标本,可以提高诊断的准确性和分子检测。本研究旨在评估EBUS-TBMC相对于EBUS-TBNA的优势,重点是提高下一代测序(NGS)的成功率,并评估其在现实环境中的有效性和安全性。方法:回顾性分析203例患者的资料,其中EBUS-TBNA 99例,EBUS-TBMC 104例。结果:EBUS-TBMC的总诊断率(90.38%)显著高于EBUS-TBNA (67.68%, p < 0.001)。对于异质性病变,EBUS-TBMC的诊断率为92.31%,EBUS-TBNA的诊断率为69.44% (p = 0.011)。对于非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC), EBUS-TBMC标本显示出更高的整体肿瘤细胞度(65%对30%,p < 0.001),并且通过NGS检测驱动因子改变的成功率更高(85.36%对61.90%,p = 0.035)。EBUS-TBMC的中位手术时间更短(22分钟vs. 32分钟;p < 0.001),两种技术之间的并发症发生率相当。这些发现表明,与EBUS-TBNA相比,EBUS-TBMC在诊断异质性病变方面具有额外的优势,并显著促进了NGS检测中富含细胞的标本的获取。结论:EBUS-TBMC提高了对纵隔疾病的总体诊断率。EBUS-TBMC提供了肿瘤含量高、细胞丰富的组织学标本,为NGS检测在NSCLC治疗中的应用提供了便利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Performance of Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Cryobiopsy in Diagnosing Thoracic Disorders and Its Role in Next-Generation Sequencing for Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

Performance of Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Cryobiopsy in Diagnosing Thoracic Disorders and Its Role in Next-Generation Sequencing for Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

Performance of Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Cryobiopsy in Diagnosing Thoracic Disorders and Its Role in Next-Generation Sequencing for Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

Performance of Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Cryobiopsy in Diagnosing Thoracic Disorders and Its Role in Next-Generation Sequencing for Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

Background: Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is an established procedure for diagnosing thoracic diseases and staging of lung cancers. However, some limitations of cytology specimens from EBUS-TBNA include small sample size, low tumour cellularity, necrosis and specimen contamination. Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial mediastinal cryobiopsy (EBUS-TBMC) is a promising alternative that provides a larger histology specimen which may improve diagnostic accuracy and molecular testing. This study is aimed at evaluating the benefits of EBUS-TBMC over EBUS-TBNA, focusing on improving next-generation sequencing (NGS) success rates, and assessing its efficacy and safety in a real-world setting. Methods: Data from 203 patients (99 underwent EBUS-TBNA and 104 underwent EBUS-TBMC) were retrospectively traced and analysed using descriptive statistics. Results: The overall diagnostic yield was significantly higher for EBUS-TBMC (90.38%) than that for EBUS-TBNA (67.68%; p < 0.001). For heterogeneous lesions, the diagnostic yield was 92.31% for EBUS-TBMC and 69.44% for EBUS-TBNA (p = 0.011). For non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), EBUS-TBMC specimens demonstrated higher overall tumour cellularity (65% vs. 30%; p < 0.001) and better success in detecting driver alterations through NGS (85.36% vs. 61.90%; p = 0.035). The median procedure duration was shorter for EBUS-TBMC (22 vs. 32 min; p < 0.001), and the complication rates were comparable between the two techniques. These findings suggest that EBUS-TBMC offers additional diagnostic advantages over EBUS-TBNA for heterogeneous lesions and significantly facilitates the acquisition of cell-rich specimens for NGS testing. Conclusion: EBUS-TBMC increases the overall diagnostic yield of mediastinal diseases. EBUS-TBMC provides cell-rich histology specimens with high tumour content, facilitating NGS testing in the management of NSCLC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pulmonary Medicine
Pulmonary Medicine RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信