撒哈拉以南非洲研究的生物伦理问题。

IF 1.6 Q2 ETHICS
Ousman Bajinka, Musa Kora, Ousman Sanyang, Serge Yannick Ouedraogo, Momodou G Bah, Lamarana Jallow
{"title":"撒哈拉以南非洲研究的生物伦理问题。","authors":"Ousman Bajinka, Musa Kora, Ousman Sanyang, Serge Yannick Ouedraogo, Momodou G Bah, Lamarana Jallow","doi":"10.1007/s40592-025-00264-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper examines bioethical considerations of research conducted in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), where a notable scarcity persists in literature addressing region-specific bioethical issues. Although bioethics-related activities have encountered challenges surpassing existing protocol safeguards, emerging evidence demonstrates growing recognition of integrated scientific and ethical principles within African medical research. Maintaining research continuity in resource-limited settings necessitates bridging critical gaps between informed consent procedures and participants' actual understanding. This narrative review assesses progress, identifies persistent challenges, and outlines future directions for clinical trials and medical research in SSA, with particular focus on adherence to established bioethical standards and integration of local normative frameworks. Our analysis reveals a significant increase in publications featuring rigorous ethical discourse about bioethical research in Africa, with particular emphasis on SSA, in recent years. The review underscores substantial deficits in ethical conduct, including frequent non-compliance with fundamental principles: informed consent, autonomy, beneficence, and non-maleficence. Furthermore, we identify a paucity of evidence concerning methodologies to improve the efficacy and quality of ethical review mechanisms.</p>","PeriodicalId":43628,"journal":{"name":"Monash Bioethics Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bio-ethical issues of research in Sub-Saharan Africa.\",\"authors\":\"Ousman Bajinka, Musa Kora, Ousman Sanyang, Serge Yannick Ouedraogo, Momodou G Bah, Lamarana Jallow\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40592-025-00264-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This paper examines bioethical considerations of research conducted in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), where a notable scarcity persists in literature addressing region-specific bioethical issues. Although bioethics-related activities have encountered challenges surpassing existing protocol safeguards, emerging evidence demonstrates growing recognition of integrated scientific and ethical principles within African medical research. Maintaining research continuity in resource-limited settings necessitates bridging critical gaps between informed consent procedures and participants' actual understanding. This narrative review assesses progress, identifies persistent challenges, and outlines future directions for clinical trials and medical research in SSA, with particular focus on adherence to established bioethical standards and integration of local normative frameworks. Our analysis reveals a significant increase in publications featuring rigorous ethical discourse about bioethical research in Africa, with particular emphasis on SSA, in recent years. The review underscores substantial deficits in ethical conduct, including frequent non-compliance with fundamental principles: informed consent, autonomy, beneficence, and non-maleficence. Furthermore, we identify a paucity of evidence concerning methodologies to improve the efficacy and quality of ethical review mechanisms.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43628,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Monash Bioethics Review\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Monash Bioethics Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40592-025-00264-z\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Monash Bioethics Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40592-025-00264-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文考察了在撒哈拉以南非洲(SSA)进行的研究的生物伦理考虑,在该地区,解决特定区域生物伦理问题的文献仍然显着稀缺。尽管与生物伦理学有关的活动遇到了超越现有议定书保障措施的挑战,但新出现的证据表明,人们日益认识到非洲医学研究中的综合科学和伦理原则。在资源有限的情况下保持研究的连续性需要弥合知情同意程序与参与者实际理解之间的关键差距。这篇叙述性综述评估了进展情况,确定了持续存在的挑战,概述了SSA临床试验和医学研究的未来方向,特别侧重于遵守既定的生物伦理标准和整合地方规范框架。我们的分析显示,近年来,关于非洲生物伦理研究的严谨伦理论述的出版物显著增加,特别强调SSA。审查强调了伦理行为的重大缺陷,包括经常不遵守基本原则:知情同意、自主、慈善和非恶意。此外,我们发现缺乏证据的方法,以提高疗效和质量的伦理审查机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bio-ethical issues of research in Sub-Saharan Africa.

This paper examines bioethical considerations of research conducted in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), where a notable scarcity persists in literature addressing region-specific bioethical issues. Although bioethics-related activities have encountered challenges surpassing existing protocol safeguards, emerging evidence demonstrates growing recognition of integrated scientific and ethical principles within African medical research. Maintaining research continuity in resource-limited settings necessitates bridging critical gaps between informed consent procedures and participants' actual understanding. This narrative review assesses progress, identifies persistent challenges, and outlines future directions for clinical trials and medical research in SSA, with particular focus on adherence to established bioethical standards and integration of local normative frameworks. Our analysis reveals a significant increase in publications featuring rigorous ethical discourse about bioethical research in Africa, with particular emphasis on SSA, in recent years. The review underscores substantial deficits in ethical conduct, including frequent non-compliance with fundamental principles: informed consent, autonomy, beneficence, and non-maleficence. Furthermore, we identify a paucity of evidence concerning methodologies to improve the efficacy and quality of ethical review mechanisms.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
6.20%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: Monash Bioethics Review provides comprehensive coverage of traditional topics and emerging issues in bioethics. The Journal is especially concerned with empirically-informed philosophical bioethical analysis with policy relevance. Monash Bioethics Review also regularly publishes empirical studies providing explicit ethical analysis and/or with significant ethical or policy implications. Produced by the Monash University Centre for Human Bioethics since 1981 (originally as Bioethics News), Monash Bioethics Review is the oldest peer reviewed bioethics journal based in Australia–and one of the oldest bioethics journals in the world. An international forum for empirically-informed philosophical bioethical analysis with policy relevance. Includes empirical studies providing explicit ethical analysis and/or with significant ethical or policy implications. One of the oldest bioethics journals, produced by a world-leading bioethics centre. Publishes papers up to 13,000 words in length. Unique New Feature: All Articles Open for Commentary
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信