Hamza Elhadri, Johann Petit, Naila Hfaiedh, Danièle Wagner, Olivier Polit
{"title":"连续和中断控制模式的自热行为比较","authors":"Hamza Elhadri, Johann Petit, Naila Hfaiedh, Danièle Wagner, Olivier Polit","doi":"10.1111/ffe.70038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>In gigacyclic fatigue testing, reaching 10<sup>9</sup> cycles within a reasonable duration is challenging, leading to the use of ultrasonic fatigue machines operating at 20 kHz (UFT). However, the high testing frequency causes significant temperature rises, potentially enhancing microplasticity and leading to premature failure. This study compares two control modes in gigacyclic fatigue: continuous and interrupted (pulse-pause) during self-heating tests on UFT. Two materials with distinct thermal properties, steel 42CrMo4 and aluminum alloy AA2024-T351, were tested. The temperature evolution was measured using an infrared camera. Then, a local expression of the heat equation is used to estimate the intrinsic dissipation, denoted as \n<span></span><math>\n <msub>\n <mi>d</mi>\n <mn>1</mn>\n </msub></math>. Results showed that both modes led to temperature increases with higher displacement, but pulse-pause caused a smaller temperature rise. Reducing the pulse time relative to the pause time decreased temperature variation. For 42CrMo4 steel, self-heating was more pronounced than for AA2024-T351, and the \n<span></span><math>\n <msub>\n <mi>d</mi>\n <mn>1</mn>\n </msub></math> value increased with displacement amplitude.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":12298,"journal":{"name":"Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures","volume":"48 10","pages":"4517-4527"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Self-Heating Behavior Between Continuous and Interrupted Control Modes\",\"authors\":\"Hamza Elhadri, Johann Petit, Naila Hfaiedh, Danièle Wagner, Olivier Polit\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ffe.70038\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>In gigacyclic fatigue testing, reaching 10<sup>9</sup> cycles within a reasonable duration is challenging, leading to the use of ultrasonic fatigue machines operating at 20 kHz (UFT). However, the high testing frequency causes significant temperature rises, potentially enhancing microplasticity and leading to premature failure. This study compares two control modes in gigacyclic fatigue: continuous and interrupted (pulse-pause) during self-heating tests on UFT. Two materials with distinct thermal properties, steel 42CrMo4 and aluminum alloy AA2024-T351, were tested. The temperature evolution was measured using an infrared camera. Then, a local expression of the heat equation is used to estimate the intrinsic dissipation, denoted as \\n<span></span><math>\\n <msub>\\n <mi>d</mi>\\n <mn>1</mn>\\n </msub></math>. Results showed that both modes led to temperature increases with higher displacement, but pulse-pause caused a smaller temperature rise. Reducing the pulse time relative to the pause time decreased temperature variation. For 42CrMo4 steel, self-heating was more pronounced than for AA2024-T351, and the \\n<span></span><math>\\n <msub>\\n <mi>d</mi>\\n <mn>1</mn>\\n </msub></math> value increased with displacement amplitude.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12298,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures\",\"volume\":\"48 10\",\"pages\":\"4517-4527\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ffe.70038\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ffe.70038","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of Self-Heating Behavior Between Continuous and Interrupted Control Modes
In gigacyclic fatigue testing, reaching 109 cycles within a reasonable duration is challenging, leading to the use of ultrasonic fatigue machines operating at 20 kHz (UFT). However, the high testing frequency causes significant temperature rises, potentially enhancing microplasticity and leading to premature failure. This study compares two control modes in gigacyclic fatigue: continuous and interrupted (pulse-pause) during self-heating tests on UFT. Two materials with distinct thermal properties, steel 42CrMo4 and aluminum alloy AA2024-T351, were tested. The temperature evolution was measured using an infrared camera. Then, a local expression of the heat equation is used to estimate the intrinsic dissipation, denoted as
. Results showed that both modes led to temperature increases with higher displacement, but pulse-pause caused a smaller temperature rise. Reducing the pulse time relative to the pause time decreased temperature variation. For 42CrMo4 steel, self-heating was more pronounced than for AA2024-T351, and the
value increased with displacement amplitude.
期刊介绍:
Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures (FFEMS) encompasses the broad topic of structural integrity which is founded on the mechanics of fatigue and fracture, and is concerned with the reliability and effectiveness of various materials and structural components of any scale or geometry. The editors publish original contributions that will stimulate the intellectual innovation that generates elegant, effective and economic engineering designs. The journal is interdisciplinary and includes papers from scientists and engineers in the fields of materials science, mechanics, physics, chemistry, etc.