重新构想通用评估系统设计的案例

IF 1.9 4区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Cara Cahalan Laitusis, Meagan Karvonen
{"title":"重新构想通用评估系统设计的案例","authors":"Cara Cahalan Laitusis,&nbsp;Meagan Karvonen","doi":"10.1111/emip.12674","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The 2014 <i>Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing</i> describe universal design as an approach that offers promise for improving the fairness of educational assessments. As the field reconsiders questions of fairness in assessments, we propose a new framework that addresses the entire assessment lifecycle: universal design of assessment systems. This framework is rooted in the original Universal Design principles but extends beyond test design and administration to the entire assessment lifecycle, from construct definition to score interpretation and use. Another core tenet within this framework is the integration of psychological theory on universal human needs for autonomy, competence, and relatedness with flexibility based on our contemporary understandings of neurodiversity, culture, and multilingualism. Finally, the framework integrates the original <i>Universal Design</i> principle of <i>tolerance for error</i>, which promotes assessment designs that anticipate unintended actions and mitigate potential harms. After describing how the principles and guidelines might apply in contexts ranging from classroom assessments to statewide assessments and licensure exams, we conclude with practical implications and next steps. We hope future versions of the <i>Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing</i> incorporate this broader, systems-wide approach to universal design.</p>","PeriodicalId":47345,"journal":{"name":"Educational Measurement-Issues and Practice","volume":"44 3","pages":"5-14"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/emip.12674","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Case for Reimagining Universal Design of Assessment Systems\",\"authors\":\"Cara Cahalan Laitusis,&nbsp;Meagan Karvonen\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/emip.12674\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The 2014 <i>Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing</i> describe universal design as an approach that offers promise for improving the fairness of educational assessments. As the field reconsiders questions of fairness in assessments, we propose a new framework that addresses the entire assessment lifecycle: universal design of assessment systems. This framework is rooted in the original Universal Design principles but extends beyond test design and administration to the entire assessment lifecycle, from construct definition to score interpretation and use. Another core tenet within this framework is the integration of psychological theory on universal human needs for autonomy, competence, and relatedness with flexibility based on our contemporary understandings of neurodiversity, culture, and multilingualism. Finally, the framework integrates the original <i>Universal Design</i> principle of <i>tolerance for error</i>, which promotes assessment designs that anticipate unintended actions and mitigate potential harms. After describing how the principles and guidelines might apply in contexts ranging from classroom assessments to statewide assessments and licensure exams, we conclude with practical implications and next steps. We hope future versions of the <i>Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing</i> incorporate this broader, systems-wide approach to universal design.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47345,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Educational Measurement-Issues and Practice\",\"volume\":\"44 3\",\"pages\":\"5-14\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/emip.12674\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Educational Measurement-Issues and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/emip.12674\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Measurement-Issues and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/emip.12674","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2014年《教育和心理测试标准》将通用设计描述为一种有望提高教育评估公平性的方法。由于该领域重新考虑评估中的公平性问题,我们提出了一个解决整个评估生命周期的新框架:评估系统的通用设计。这个框架根植于最初的通用设计原则,但是从测试设计和管理扩展到整个评估生命周期,从构造定义到分数解释和使用。该框架的另一个核心原则是基于我们当代对神经多样性、文化和多语言的理解,将心理学理论与人类对自主性、能力和灵活性的普遍需求相结合。最后,该框架整合了原始的通用设计容错原则,这促进了预测意外行为和减轻潜在危害的评估设计。在描述了原则和指导方针如何适用于从课堂评估到全州评估和执照考试的各种环境之后,我们总结了实际意义和下一步。我们希望教育和心理测试标准的未来版本将这种更广泛的、全系统的方法纳入通用设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A Case for Reimagining Universal Design of Assessment Systems

A Case for Reimagining Universal Design of Assessment Systems

The 2014 Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing describe universal design as an approach that offers promise for improving the fairness of educational assessments. As the field reconsiders questions of fairness in assessments, we propose a new framework that addresses the entire assessment lifecycle: universal design of assessment systems. This framework is rooted in the original Universal Design principles but extends beyond test design and administration to the entire assessment lifecycle, from construct definition to score interpretation and use. Another core tenet within this framework is the integration of psychological theory on universal human needs for autonomy, competence, and relatedness with flexibility based on our contemporary understandings of neurodiversity, culture, and multilingualism. Finally, the framework integrates the original Universal Design principle of tolerance for error, which promotes assessment designs that anticipate unintended actions and mitigate potential harms. After describing how the principles and guidelines might apply in contexts ranging from classroom assessments to statewide assessments and licensure exams, we conclude with practical implications and next steps. We hope future versions of the Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing incorporate this broader, systems-wide approach to universal design.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
15.00%
发文量
47
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信