{"title":"随机现场检查对自愿信息披露的双重威慑作用:来自自愿管理层盈余预测的证据","authors":"Fenling Gu, Boyuan Tian, Yixian Ma","doi":"10.1002/mde.4556","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>In the face of the dilemma between disclosure willingness and disclosure quality in voluntary information disclosure regulation, alongside prevalent violations in voluntary disclosure practices, it is necessary to further analyze whether random on-site inspection is an effective approach of regulating voluntary disclosure. This paper examines the impact of the China Securities Regulatory Commission's (CSRC) randomized inspections on voluntary information disclosure, focusing on voluntary earnings forecasts. Using a sample of Chinese A-share listed companies from 2016 to 2022, the study explores whether the “double random, one open” effectively resolves the conflicting issues between disclosure quality and willingness in the regulation of voluntary information disclosures. Our findings indicate that after being included in the CSRC's randomized inspection list, companies show a significant improvement in the quality of their voluntary earnings forecast disclosures, without a reduction in their willingness to disclose. Mechanism analysis reveals that randomized inspections enhance the quality of voluntary earnings forecasts through direct deterrence, by increasing the intensity of regulatory penalties, and indirect deterrence, by attracting market participants, media, and regulatory attention. Heterogeneity analysis suggests that such deterrence effect is more pronounced in regions with higher regulatory pressure and in cases where resampling selection is employed. Heterogeneity analysis based on firm characteristics indicates that the deterrent effect of randomized on-site inspections is more pronounced in smaller firms and non-state-owned enterprises. Economic consequence analysis shows that enhancing the quality of voluntary earnings forecasts through randomized on-site inspections can help reduce the risk of stock price crashes. Additionally, randomized inspections may lead to more conservative disclosures by listed companies, expanding the width of earnings forecasts. However, the reduction in the precision of management earnings forecasts would not result in negative economic consequences. In the context of inadequate regulation of voluntary information, this paper provides feasible solutions for further standardizing the regulation of voluntary disclosure.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":18186,"journal":{"name":"Managerial and Decision Economics","volume":"46 7","pages":"3783-3805"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dual Deterrent Effects of Randomized On-Site Inspections on Voluntary Information Disclosure: Evidence From Voluntary Management Earnings Forecasts\",\"authors\":\"Fenling Gu, Boyuan Tian, Yixian Ma\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/mde.4556\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>In the face of the dilemma between disclosure willingness and disclosure quality in voluntary information disclosure regulation, alongside prevalent violations in voluntary disclosure practices, it is necessary to further analyze whether random on-site inspection is an effective approach of regulating voluntary disclosure. This paper examines the impact of the China Securities Regulatory Commission's (CSRC) randomized inspections on voluntary information disclosure, focusing on voluntary earnings forecasts. Using a sample of Chinese A-share listed companies from 2016 to 2022, the study explores whether the “double random, one open” effectively resolves the conflicting issues between disclosure quality and willingness in the regulation of voluntary information disclosures. Our findings indicate that after being included in the CSRC's randomized inspection list, companies show a significant improvement in the quality of their voluntary earnings forecast disclosures, without a reduction in their willingness to disclose. Mechanism analysis reveals that randomized inspections enhance the quality of voluntary earnings forecasts through direct deterrence, by increasing the intensity of regulatory penalties, and indirect deterrence, by attracting market participants, media, and regulatory attention. Heterogeneity analysis suggests that such deterrence effect is more pronounced in regions with higher regulatory pressure and in cases where resampling selection is employed. Heterogeneity analysis based on firm characteristics indicates that the deterrent effect of randomized on-site inspections is more pronounced in smaller firms and non-state-owned enterprises. Economic consequence analysis shows that enhancing the quality of voluntary earnings forecasts through randomized on-site inspections can help reduce the risk of stock price crashes. Additionally, randomized inspections may lead to more conservative disclosures by listed companies, expanding the width of earnings forecasts. However, the reduction in the precision of management earnings forecasts would not result in negative economic consequences. In the context of inadequate regulation of voluntary information, this paper provides feasible solutions for further standardizing the regulation of voluntary disclosure.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18186,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Managerial and Decision Economics\",\"volume\":\"46 7\",\"pages\":\"3783-3805\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Managerial and Decision Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mde.4556\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Managerial and Decision Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mde.4556","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Dual Deterrent Effects of Randomized On-Site Inspections on Voluntary Information Disclosure: Evidence From Voluntary Management Earnings Forecasts
In the face of the dilemma between disclosure willingness and disclosure quality in voluntary information disclosure regulation, alongside prevalent violations in voluntary disclosure practices, it is necessary to further analyze whether random on-site inspection is an effective approach of regulating voluntary disclosure. This paper examines the impact of the China Securities Regulatory Commission's (CSRC) randomized inspections on voluntary information disclosure, focusing on voluntary earnings forecasts. Using a sample of Chinese A-share listed companies from 2016 to 2022, the study explores whether the “double random, one open” effectively resolves the conflicting issues between disclosure quality and willingness in the regulation of voluntary information disclosures. Our findings indicate that after being included in the CSRC's randomized inspection list, companies show a significant improvement in the quality of their voluntary earnings forecast disclosures, without a reduction in their willingness to disclose. Mechanism analysis reveals that randomized inspections enhance the quality of voluntary earnings forecasts through direct deterrence, by increasing the intensity of regulatory penalties, and indirect deterrence, by attracting market participants, media, and regulatory attention. Heterogeneity analysis suggests that such deterrence effect is more pronounced in regions with higher regulatory pressure and in cases where resampling selection is employed. Heterogeneity analysis based on firm characteristics indicates that the deterrent effect of randomized on-site inspections is more pronounced in smaller firms and non-state-owned enterprises. Economic consequence analysis shows that enhancing the quality of voluntary earnings forecasts through randomized on-site inspections can help reduce the risk of stock price crashes. Additionally, randomized inspections may lead to more conservative disclosures by listed companies, expanding the width of earnings forecasts. However, the reduction in the precision of management earnings forecasts would not result in negative economic consequences. In the context of inadequate regulation of voluntary information, this paper provides feasible solutions for further standardizing the regulation of voluntary disclosure.
期刊介绍:
Managerial and Decision Economics will publish articles applying economic reasoning to managerial decision-making and management strategy.Management strategy concerns practical decisions that managers face about how to compete, how to succeed, and how to organize to achieve their goals. Economic thinking and analysis provides a critical foundation for strategic decision-making across a variety of dimensions. For example, economic insights may help in determining which activities to outsource and which to perfom internally. They can help unravel questions regarding what drives performance differences among firms and what allows these differences to persist. They can contribute to an appreciation of how industries, organizations, and capabilities evolve.