随机现场检查对自愿信息披露的双重威慑作用:来自自愿管理层盈余预测的证据

IF 2.7 3区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS
Fenling Gu, Boyuan Tian, Yixian Ma
{"title":"随机现场检查对自愿信息披露的双重威慑作用:来自自愿管理层盈余预测的证据","authors":"Fenling Gu,&nbsp;Boyuan Tian,&nbsp;Yixian Ma","doi":"10.1002/mde.4556","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>In the face of the dilemma between disclosure willingness and disclosure quality in voluntary information disclosure regulation, alongside prevalent violations in voluntary disclosure practices, it is necessary to further analyze whether random on-site inspection is an effective approach of regulating voluntary disclosure. This paper examines the impact of the China Securities Regulatory Commission's (CSRC) randomized inspections on voluntary information disclosure, focusing on voluntary earnings forecasts. Using a sample of Chinese A-share listed companies from 2016 to 2022, the study explores whether the “double random, one open” effectively resolves the conflicting issues between disclosure quality and willingness in the regulation of voluntary information disclosures. Our findings indicate that after being included in the CSRC's randomized inspection list, companies show a significant improvement in the quality of their voluntary earnings forecast disclosures, without a reduction in their willingness to disclose. Mechanism analysis reveals that randomized inspections enhance the quality of voluntary earnings forecasts through direct deterrence, by increasing the intensity of regulatory penalties, and indirect deterrence, by attracting market participants, media, and regulatory attention. Heterogeneity analysis suggests that such deterrence effect is more pronounced in regions with higher regulatory pressure and in cases where resampling selection is employed. Heterogeneity analysis based on firm characteristics indicates that the deterrent effect of randomized on-site inspections is more pronounced in smaller firms and non-state-owned enterprises. Economic consequence analysis shows that enhancing the quality of voluntary earnings forecasts through randomized on-site inspections can help reduce the risk of stock price crashes. Additionally, randomized inspections may lead to more conservative disclosures by listed companies, expanding the width of earnings forecasts. However, the reduction in the precision of management earnings forecasts would not result in negative economic consequences. In the context of inadequate regulation of voluntary information, this paper provides feasible solutions for further standardizing the regulation of voluntary disclosure.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":18186,"journal":{"name":"Managerial and Decision Economics","volume":"46 7","pages":"3783-3805"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dual Deterrent Effects of Randomized On-Site Inspections on Voluntary Information Disclosure: Evidence From Voluntary Management Earnings Forecasts\",\"authors\":\"Fenling Gu,&nbsp;Boyuan Tian,&nbsp;Yixian Ma\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/mde.4556\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>In the face of the dilemma between disclosure willingness and disclosure quality in voluntary information disclosure regulation, alongside prevalent violations in voluntary disclosure practices, it is necessary to further analyze whether random on-site inspection is an effective approach of regulating voluntary disclosure. This paper examines the impact of the China Securities Regulatory Commission's (CSRC) randomized inspections on voluntary information disclosure, focusing on voluntary earnings forecasts. Using a sample of Chinese A-share listed companies from 2016 to 2022, the study explores whether the “double random, one open” effectively resolves the conflicting issues between disclosure quality and willingness in the regulation of voluntary information disclosures. Our findings indicate that after being included in the CSRC's randomized inspection list, companies show a significant improvement in the quality of their voluntary earnings forecast disclosures, without a reduction in their willingness to disclose. Mechanism analysis reveals that randomized inspections enhance the quality of voluntary earnings forecasts through direct deterrence, by increasing the intensity of regulatory penalties, and indirect deterrence, by attracting market participants, media, and regulatory attention. Heterogeneity analysis suggests that such deterrence effect is more pronounced in regions with higher regulatory pressure and in cases where resampling selection is employed. Heterogeneity analysis based on firm characteristics indicates that the deterrent effect of randomized on-site inspections is more pronounced in smaller firms and non-state-owned enterprises. Economic consequence analysis shows that enhancing the quality of voluntary earnings forecasts through randomized on-site inspections can help reduce the risk of stock price crashes. Additionally, randomized inspections may lead to more conservative disclosures by listed companies, expanding the width of earnings forecasts. However, the reduction in the precision of management earnings forecasts would not result in negative economic consequences. In the context of inadequate regulation of voluntary information, this paper provides feasible solutions for further standardizing the regulation of voluntary disclosure.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18186,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Managerial and Decision Economics\",\"volume\":\"46 7\",\"pages\":\"3783-3805\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Managerial and Decision Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mde.4556\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Managerial and Decision Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mde.4556","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

面对自愿信息披露监管中披露意愿与披露质量的两难困境,以及自愿信息披露实践中普遍存在的违规行为,有必要进一步分析随机现场检查是否是一种有效的自愿信息披露监管方式。本文考察了中国证监会随机抽查对自愿性信息披露的影响,重点考察了自愿性收益预测。本研究以2016 - 2022年中国a股上市公司为样本,探讨“双随机一公开”是否有效解决了信息自愿披露监管中披露质量与披露意愿的矛盾问题。我们的研究结果表明,在被纳入中国证监会随机抽查名单后,企业自愿披露收益预测的质量显著提高,但披露意愿并未降低。机制分析表明,随机检查通过直接威慑(通过增加监管处罚的力度)和间接威慑(通过吸引市场参与者、媒体和监管机构的关注)来提高自愿收益预测的质量。异质性分析表明,这种威慑效应在监管压力较大的地区和采用重采样选择的情况下更为明显。基于企业特征的异质性分析表明,随机现场检查对中小企业和非国有企业的威慑作用更为明显。经济后果分析表明,通过随机现场检查提高自愿收益预测的质量有助于降低股价崩盘的风险。此外,随机检查可能会导致上市公司披露的信息更加保守,从而扩大盈利预测的广度。然而,管理层盈利预测精度的降低不会导致负面的经济后果。在自愿性信息监管不足的背景下,本文为进一步规范自愿性信息披露监管提供了可行的解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dual Deterrent Effects of Randomized On-Site Inspections on Voluntary Information Disclosure: Evidence From Voluntary Management Earnings Forecasts

In the face of the dilemma between disclosure willingness and disclosure quality in voluntary information disclosure regulation, alongside prevalent violations in voluntary disclosure practices, it is necessary to further analyze whether random on-site inspection is an effective approach of regulating voluntary disclosure. This paper examines the impact of the China Securities Regulatory Commission's (CSRC) randomized inspections on voluntary information disclosure, focusing on voluntary earnings forecasts. Using a sample of Chinese A-share listed companies from 2016 to 2022, the study explores whether the “double random, one open” effectively resolves the conflicting issues between disclosure quality and willingness in the regulation of voluntary information disclosures. Our findings indicate that after being included in the CSRC's randomized inspection list, companies show a significant improvement in the quality of their voluntary earnings forecast disclosures, without a reduction in their willingness to disclose. Mechanism analysis reveals that randomized inspections enhance the quality of voluntary earnings forecasts through direct deterrence, by increasing the intensity of regulatory penalties, and indirect deterrence, by attracting market participants, media, and regulatory attention. Heterogeneity analysis suggests that such deterrence effect is more pronounced in regions with higher regulatory pressure and in cases where resampling selection is employed. Heterogeneity analysis based on firm characteristics indicates that the deterrent effect of randomized on-site inspections is more pronounced in smaller firms and non-state-owned enterprises. Economic consequence analysis shows that enhancing the quality of voluntary earnings forecasts through randomized on-site inspections can help reduce the risk of stock price crashes. Additionally, randomized inspections may lead to more conservative disclosures by listed companies, expanding the width of earnings forecasts. However, the reduction in the precision of management earnings forecasts would not result in negative economic consequences. In the context of inadequate regulation of voluntary information, this paper provides feasible solutions for further standardizing the regulation of voluntary disclosure.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
18.20%
发文量
242
期刊介绍: Managerial and Decision Economics will publish articles applying economic reasoning to managerial decision-making and management strategy.Management strategy concerns practical decisions that managers face about how to compete, how to succeed, and how to organize to achieve their goals. Economic thinking and analysis provides a critical foundation for strategic decision-making across a variety of dimensions. For example, economic insights may help in determining which activities to outsource and which to perfom internally. They can help unravel questions regarding what drives performance differences among firms and what allows these differences to persist. They can contribute to an appreciation of how industries, organizations, and capabilities evolve.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信