与Sanger测序相比,下一代测序改进了基于16S rRNA扩增子的临床样品微生物群分析

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q4 IMMUNOLOGY
Apmis Pub Date : 2025-09-09 DOI:10.1111/apm.70067
Huma Aftab, Christian H. Schouw, Rimtas Dargis, Laus K. Vejrum, Rikke L. Johansen, Josefine Tange Møller, Tina V. Madsen, Asta Lili Laugesen, Jens J. Christensen, Michael Kemp, Xiaohui C. Nielsen
{"title":"与Sanger测序相比,下一代测序改进了基于16S rRNA扩增子的临床样品微生物群分析","authors":"Huma Aftab,&nbsp;Christian H. Schouw,&nbsp;Rimtas Dargis,&nbsp;Laus K. Vejrum,&nbsp;Rikke L. Johansen,&nbsp;Josefine Tange Møller,&nbsp;Tina V. Madsen,&nbsp;Asta Lili Laugesen,&nbsp;Jens J. Christensen,&nbsp;Michael Kemp,&nbsp;Xiaohui C. Nielsen","doi":"10.1111/apm.70067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Sequencing of the 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene is an important tool in addition to conventional methods for the identification of bacterial pathogens in human infections. In polymicrobial samples, Sanger sequencing can produce uninterpretable chromatograms. This limitation can be overcome by Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) of the 16S rRNA gene. We investigated the applicability of Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) sequencing of the partial 16S rRNA gene as a diagnostic routine method for pathogen detection in clinical samples. From June 2021 to August 2022, 101 clinical samples positive in PCR for partial 16S rRNA gene analysis were subjected to both Sanger and ONT sequencing. Sanger sequences were edited and compared with deposited sequences in the NCBI database using BLAST, while ONT data were processed using EPI2ME Fastq 16S. The positivity rate (clinically relevant pathogen) was higher for ONT vs. Sanger sequencing: 72% and 59%, respectively. Concordance between Sanger and ONT sequencing was 80%. Furthermore, ONT detected more samples with polymicrobial presence compared to Sanger (13 vs. 5) sequencing. Interestingly, in one joint fluid sample, <i>Borrelia bissettiiae</i> was identified by ONT but not by Sanger. The results show that the detection of both monobacterial and multiple bacterial species is improved using ONT.</p>","PeriodicalId":8167,"journal":{"name":"Apmis","volume":"133 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/apm.70067","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Next Generation Sequencing Improves Diagnostic 16S rRNA Amplicon-Based Microbiota Analyses of Clinical Samples Compared to Sanger Sequencing\",\"authors\":\"Huma Aftab,&nbsp;Christian H. Schouw,&nbsp;Rimtas Dargis,&nbsp;Laus K. Vejrum,&nbsp;Rikke L. Johansen,&nbsp;Josefine Tange Møller,&nbsp;Tina V. Madsen,&nbsp;Asta Lili Laugesen,&nbsp;Jens J. Christensen,&nbsp;Michael Kemp,&nbsp;Xiaohui C. Nielsen\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/apm.70067\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Sequencing of the 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene is an important tool in addition to conventional methods for the identification of bacterial pathogens in human infections. In polymicrobial samples, Sanger sequencing can produce uninterpretable chromatograms. This limitation can be overcome by Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) of the 16S rRNA gene. We investigated the applicability of Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) sequencing of the partial 16S rRNA gene as a diagnostic routine method for pathogen detection in clinical samples. From June 2021 to August 2022, 101 clinical samples positive in PCR for partial 16S rRNA gene analysis were subjected to both Sanger and ONT sequencing. Sanger sequences were edited and compared with deposited sequences in the NCBI database using BLAST, while ONT data were processed using EPI2ME Fastq 16S. The positivity rate (clinically relevant pathogen) was higher for ONT vs. Sanger sequencing: 72% and 59%, respectively. Concordance between Sanger and ONT sequencing was 80%. Furthermore, ONT detected more samples with polymicrobial presence compared to Sanger (13 vs. 5) sequencing. Interestingly, in one joint fluid sample, <i>Borrelia bissettiiae</i> was identified by ONT but not by Sanger. The results show that the detection of both monobacterial and multiple bacterial species is improved using ONT.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8167,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Apmis\",\"volume\":\"133 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/apm.70067\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Apmis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/apm.70067\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Apmis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/apm.70067","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

16S核糖体RNA (rRNA)基因测序是除常规方法外鉴定人类感染细菌病原体的重要工具。在多微生物样品中,桑格测序可能产生无法解释的色谱图。这一限制可以通过16S rRNA基因的下一代测序(NGS)来克服。我们研究了牛津纳米孔技术(ONT)对部分16S rRNA基因的测序作为临床样品中病原体检测的常规诊断方法的适用性。从2021年6月到2022年8月,101份16S rRNA部分基因PCR阳性的临床样本进行了Sanger和ONT测序。使用BLAST编辑Sanger序列并与NCBI数据库中的沉积序列进行比较,使用EPI2ME Fastq 16S处理ONT数据。ONT测序的阳性率(临床相关病原体)高于Sanger测序:分别为72%和59%。Sanger测序与ONT测序的一致性为80%。此外,与Sanger测序相比,ONT检测到更多具有多微生物存在的样品(13比5)。有趣的是,在一个关节液样本中,ONT检测到双性疏螺旋体,但Sanger检测不到。结果表明,ONT对单株细菌和多株细菌的检测效果均有提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Next Generation Sequencing Improves Diagnostic 16S rRNA Amplicon-Based Microbiota Analyses of Clinical Samples Compared to Sanger Sequencing

Next Generation Sequencing Improves Diagnostic 16S rRNA Amplicon-Based Microbiota Analyses of Clinical Samples Compared to Sanger Sequencing

Sequencing of the 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene is an important tool in addition to conventional methods for the identification of bacterial pathogens in human infections. In polymicrobial samples, Sanger sequencing can produce uninterpretable chromatograms. This limitation can be overcome by Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) of the 16S rRNA gene. We investigated the applicability of Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) sequencing of the partial 16S rRNA gene as a diagnostic routine method for pathogen detection in clinical samples. From June 2021 to August 2022, 101 clinical samples positive in PCR for partial 16S rRNA gene analysis were subjected to both Sanger and ONT sequencing. Sanger sequences were edited and compared with deposited sequences in the NCBI database using BLAST, while ONT data were processed using EPI2ME Fastq 16S. The positivity rate (clinically relevant pathogen) was higher for ONT vs. Sanger sequencing: 72% and 59%, respectively. Concordance between Sanger and ONT sequencing was 80%. Furthermore, ONT detected more samples with polymicrobial presence compared to Sanger (13 vs. 5) sequencing. Interestingly, in one joint fluid sample, Borrelia bissettiiae was identified by ONT but not by Sanger. The results show that the detection of both monobacterial and multiple bacterial species is improved using ONT.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Apmis
Apmis 医学-病理学
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
91
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: APMIS, formerly Acta Pathologica, Microbiologica et Immunologica Scandinavica, has been published since 1924 by the Scandinavian Societies for Medical Microbiology and Pathology as a non-profit-making scientific journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信