氨尿素比:一种无创的一线检测门静脉高压的工具

IF 1.5 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
JGH Open Pub Date : 2025-09-08 DOI:10.1002/jgh3.70273
Hatime Ouahbi, Vincent Haghnejad, Alexia Audouy, Maël Silva Rodriguez, Françoise Barbé, Jean-Louis Guéant, Jean-Pierre Bronowicki, Abderrahim Oussalah
{"title":"氨尿素比:一种无创的一线检测门静脉高压的工具","authors":"Hatime Ouahbi,&nbsp;Vincent Haghnejad,&nbsp;Alexia Audouy,&nbsp;Maël Silva Rodriguez,&nbsp;Françoise Barbé,&nbsp;Jean-Louis Guéant,&nbsp;Jean-Pierre Bronowicki,&nbsp;Abderrahim Oussalah","doi":"10.1002/jgh3.70273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Cirrhosis progresses from compensated to decompensated phases, often marked by portal hypertension and complications like ascites, variceal hemorrhage, and hepatic encephalopathy. The ammonia-to-urea (A-to-U) ratio, reflecting urea cycle efficiency, may offer superior diagnostic performance compared to plasma ammonia levels alone. This study compared the diagnostic accuracy of the A-to-U ratio and plasma ammonia levels for identifying portal hypertension.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We conducted a derivation (2019–2020) and validation (2020–2022) study in patients with chronic liver disease. In the derivation study, outcomes included imaging findings of portal hypertension and clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) per BAVENO VII criteria. Validation outcomes encompassed CSPH, gastroesophageal varices, and portal hypertensive gastropathy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>In the derivation study (<i>n</i> = 180), the A-to-U ratio, but not plasma ammonia, showed high diagnostic accuracy for detecting imaging findings suggestive of portal hypertension and CSPH (A-to-U ratio &gt; 1.53 mg/g; diagnostic odds ratio [dOR], 4.04 [95% CI, 1.98–8.24; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001] and dOR, 5.71 [95% CI, 2.87–11.37; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001], respectively), and this association with CSPH remained significant after adjustment for renal function. In the validation study (<i>n</i> = 232), an A-to-U ratio &gt; 1.53 mg/g had a dOR of 9.42 (95% CI, 4.63–19.21; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001) for the diagnosis of CSPH. An A-to-U ratio &gt; 1.53 mg/g showed independent associations with esophageal varices (dOR 4.44; 95% CI, 1.44–13.72; <i>p</i> = 0.01) and portal hypertensive gastropathy (dOR 9.33; 95% CI 2.65–32.92; <i>p</i> = 0.0005), whereas the BAVENO VII criteria did not.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>Our study suggests that an A-to-U ratio &gt; 1.53 mg/g may serve as a useful noninvasive tool for identifying CSPH, gastroesophageal varices, and portal hypertensive gastropathy in patients with chronic liver disease.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":45861,"journal":{"name":"JGH Open","volume":"9 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jgh3.70273","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ammonia-to-Urea Ratio: A Noninvasive First-Line Tool for Detecting Clinically Significant Portal Hypertension\",\"authors\":\"Hatime Ouahbi,&nbsp;Vincent Haghnejad,&nbsp;Alexia Audouy,&nbsp;Maël Silva Rodriguez,&nbsp;Françoise Barbé,&nbsp;Jean-Louis Guéant,&nbsp;Jean-Pierre Bronowicki,&nbsp;Abderrahim Oussalah\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jgh3.70273\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>Cirrhosis progresses from compensated to decompensated phases, often marked by portal hypertension and complications like ascites, variceal hemorrhage, and hepatic encephalopathy. The ammonia-to-urea (A-to-U) ratio, reflecting urea cycle efficiency, may offer superior diagnostic performance compared to plasma ammonia levels alone. This study compared the diagnostic accuracy of the A-to-U ratio and plasma ammonia levels for identifying portal hypertension.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We conducted a derivation (2019–2020) and validation (2020–2022) study in patients with chronic liver disease. In the derivation study, outcomes included imaging findings of portal hypertension and clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) per BAVENO VII criteria. Validation outcomes encompassed CSPH, gastroesophageal varices, and portal hypertensive gastropathy.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>In the derivation study (<i>n</i> = 180), the A-to-U ratio, but not plasma ammonia, showed high diagnostic accuracy for detecting imaging findings suggestive of portal hypertension and CSPH (A-to-U ratio &gt; 1.53 mg/g; diagnostic odds ratio [dOR], 4.04 [95% CI, 1.98–8.24; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001] and dOR, 5.71 [95% CI, 2.87–11.37; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001], respectively), and this association with CSPH remained significant after adjustment for renal function. In the validation study (<i>n</i> = 232), an A-to-U ratio &gt; 1.53 mg/g had a dOR of 9.42 (95% CI, 4.63–19.21; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001) for the diagnosis of CSPH. An A-to-U ratio &gt; 1.53 mg/g showed independent associations with esophageal varices (dOR 4.44; 95% CI, 1.44–13.72; <i>p</i> = 0.01) and portal hypertensive gastropathy (dOR 9.33; 95% CI 2.65–32.92; <i>p</i> = 0.0005), whereas the BAVENO VII criteria did not.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Discussion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Our study suggests that an A-to-U ratio &gt; 1.53 mg/g may serve as a useful noninvasive tool for identifying CSPH, gastroesophageal varices, and portal hypertensive gastropathy in patients with chronic liver disease.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45861,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JGH Open\",\"volume\":\"9 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jgh3.70273\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JGH Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jgh3.70273\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JGH Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jgh3.70273","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

肝硬化从代偿期发展到失代偿期,常以门脉高压和腹水、静脉曲张出血、肝性脑病等并发症为特征。氨-尿素(A-to-U)比反映尿素循环效率,与单独的血浆氨水平相比,可能提供更好的诊断性能。本研究比较了a - u比和血浆氨水平对门脉高压的诊断准确性。方法对慢性肝病患者进行衍生性(2019-2020)和验证性(2020-2022)研究。在衍生性研究中,结果包括门静脉高压的影像学表现和符合BAVENO VII标准的临床显著门静脉高压(CSPH)。验证结果包括CSPH、胃食管静脉曲张和门脉高压性胃病。在衍生性研究中(n = 180), A-to-U比,而不是血浆氨,在检测门脉高压和CSPH的影像学表现方面显示出较高的诊断准确性(A-to-U比>; 1.53 mg/g;诊断优势比[dOR]分别为4.04 [95% CI, 1.98-8.24; p <; 0.0001]和dOR, 5.71 [95% CI, 2.87-11.37; p < 0.0001]),并且在调整肾功能后,这种与CSPH的相关性仍然显著。在验证研究中(n = 232), a - u比1.53 mg/g诊断CSPH的dOR为9.42 (95% CI, 4.63-19.21; p < 0.0001)。a - u比1.53 mg/g与食管静脉曲张(dOR 4.44; 95% CI, 1.44-13.72; p = 0.01)和门脉高压性胃病(dOR 9.33; 95% CI 2.65-32.92; p = 0.0005)独立相关,而BAVENO VII标准则没有。我们的研究表明,1.53 mg/g的a - u比值可以作为一种有用的无创工具,用于识别慢性肝病患者的CSPH、胃食管静脉曲张和门脉高压性胃病。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Ammonia-to-Urea Ratio: A Noninvasive First-Line Tool for Detecting Clinically Significant Portal Hypertension

Ammonia-to-Urea Ratio: A Noninvasive First-Line Tool for Detecting Clinically Significant Portal Hypertension

Introduction

Cirrhosis progresses from compensated to decompensated phases, often marked by portal hypertension and complications like ascites, variceal hemorrhage, and hepatic encephalopathy. The ammonia-to-urea (A-to-U) ratio, reflecting urea cycle efficiency, may offer superior diagnostic performance compared to plasma ammonia levels alone. This study compared the diagnostic accuracy of the A-to-U ratio and plasma ammonia levels for identifying portal hypertension.

Methods

We conducted a derivation (2019–2020) and validation (2020–2022) study in patients with chronic liver disease. In the derivation study, outcomes included imaging findings of portal hypertension and clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) per BAVENO VII criteria. Validation outcomes encompassed CSPH, gastroesophageal varices, and portal hypertensive gastropathy.

Results

In the derivation study (n = 180), the A-to-U ratio, but not plasma ammonia, showed high diagnostic accuracy for detecting imaging findings suggestive of portal hypertension and CSPH (A-to-U ratio > 1.53 mg/g; diagnostic odds ratio [dOR], 4.04 [95% CI, 1.98–8.24; p < 0.0001] and dOR, 5.71 [95% CI, 2.87–11.37; p < 0.0001], respectively), and this association with CSPH remained significant after adjustment for renal function. In the validation study (n = 232), an A-to-U ratio > 1.53 mg/g had a dOR of 9.42 (95% CI, 4.63–19.21; p < 0.0001) for the diagnosis of CSPH. An A-to-U ratio > 1.53 mg/g showed independent associations with esophageal varices (dOR 4.44; 95% CI, 1.44–13.72; p = 0.01) and portal hypertensive gastropathy (dOR 9.33; 95% CI 2.65–32.92; p = 0.0005), whereas the BAVENO VII criteria did not.

Discussion

Our study suggests that an A-to-U ratio > 1.53 mg/g may serve as a useful noninvasive tool for identifying CSPH, gastroesophageal varices, and portal hypertensive gastropathy in patients with chronic liver disease.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JGH Open
JGH Open GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
143
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信