美国农场牛和牛工人对甲型H5N1和D型流感病毒的低水平中和抗体,2024-2025

IF 4.2 4区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Ismaila Shittu, Daniel B. Cummings, John T. Groves, Alex G. Hagan, Gregory C. Gray
{"title":"美国农场牛和牛工人对甲型H5N1和D型流感病毒的低水平中和抗体,2024-2025","authors":"Ismaila Shittu,&nbsp;Daniel B. Cummings,&nbsp;John T. Groves,&nbsp;Alex G. Hagan,&nbsp;Gregory C. Gray","doi":"10.1111/irv.70162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Bovine respiratory disease complex (BRDC) is a major disease problem in cattle production systems. Numerous pathogens have been implicated as causing BRDC, including the recently discovered influenza D virus (IDV) [<span>1</span>]. IDV has been found to be highly enzootic in cattle across multiple continents [<span>1, 2</span>], and there is some evidence of spillover to livestock workers [<span>3, 4</span>]. In March 2024, unprecedented outbreaks of influenza A virus (IAV) H5N1 clade 2.3.4.4b were reported in the United States [<span>5</span>] with occasional spillover to dairy and poultry workers [<span>6, 7</span>]. Given the occupational threats of both IDV and IAV H5N1, we sought to assess the dynamics of antibodies to IAV H5N1 and IDV in farm workers and cattle.</p><p>As part of our One Health surveillance initiative in the United States and Mexico [<span>6, 8</span>], between April 2024 and May 2025 we enrolled a total of seven dairy and beef cattle farms in Indiana (<i>n</i> = 1), Kentucky (<i>n</i> = 3), and Texas (<i>n</i> = 2) (Table 1). Our visits to these farms took place on four separate occasions, permitting us to prospectively follow the farms. We obtained informed consent from every farm worker who participated in the study. Based on availability, we collected 5 to 10 mL of blood from both the cattle and the farm workers through venipuncture using a plain vacutainer tube (BD, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). After collection, the blood samples were centrifuged at 600 <i>g</i> for 15 min, and the serum was harvested and stored in microtubes at −20°C. Throughout the four visits, we collected 270 serum samples, which comprised 142 samples from cattle and 128 samples from farm workers (Table 1). Ethical approval for the study was granted by the University of Texas Medical Branch's Institutional Review Board (23-0085).</p><p>To determine the presence of neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) against IAV-H5 and IDV in both the cattle and farm workers sera, we conducted microneutralization (MN) assays. Briefly, serum samples were treated overnight (18–20 h) with Receptor Destroying Enzyme II (RDE; Denka Seiken, Tokyo, Japan) according to the manufacturer's instructions. This treatment was necessary to eliminate nonspecific inhibitors that could interfere with the assay. Starting with a dilution of 1:20 to 1:2560 RDE-treated sera, we used a recombinant H5N1 virus (rg-A/bald eagle/Florida/W22-134-OP/2022 of clade 2.3.4.4b) and a bovine-origin IDV strain (D/Bovine/Kansas/1-35/2010) on a monolayer of Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK; ATCC cat. no. CRL-CCL34) cells in 96-well plates following standard procedures with minor modifications [<span>4, 9</span>].</p><p>As measured by the MN assay, none of the enrolled beef cattle farm workers had NAbs antibodies to IAV-H5 during any of the four visits to the farms in Indiana, Kentucky, and Texas, except for the first visit to Texas (Table 1). During this visit, two dairy farm workers were found to have NAbs to IAV-H5 [<span>6</span>]. Furthermore, NAbs to IAV-H5 were not detected in any beef cattle tested during the four field visits in Indiana, Kentucky, and Texas. However, 19 of the 22 (73.3%) Texas dairy cattle on one farm showed elevated NAbs to IAV-H5 (Table 1). Additionally, at least 7 of 15 (46.7%) out of these dairy cattle maintained elevated NAbs levels during subsequent visits for over a year (Shittu et al., manuscript under journal review).</p><p>We found NAbs to IDV in one of 128 farm worker serum samples (0.8%). Notably, antibodies to IDV were consistently detected in the serum of this worker at every visit. This indicates that NAbs in individuals infected with IDV can persist for more than a year. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report documenting the persistence of antibodies to IDV in farm workers. This finding highlights the importance of monitoring immune responses in this population, who are often exposed to various pathogens in their work environment.</p><p>Understanding how long antibodies remain detectable can provide valuable insights into the immune system's effectiveness to clear invading pathogens and guide future health strategies for workers in agricultural settings. In the cattle, during the winter of 2024 (third visit), we detected NAbs against IDV exclusively in the beef cattle (Table 1). In Indiana, 2 of 6 beef cows (33.3%) tested positive for IDV NAbs. In Kentucky, 1 of 19 beef cows (5.3%) had IDV NAbs, while in Texas, 10 of 30 beef cows (22.2%) were found to have IDV NAbs (Table 1). Unlike IAV and other respiratory viruses with high incidences during winter [<span>10</span>], little is known about the seasonality of IDV. More extensive research should be conducted in establishing the seasonality of IDV in cattle to aid in control strategies. In conclusion, our study documents a low prevalence of neutralizing antibodies to IAV H5N1 and IDV in both cattle and cattle workers.</p><p><b>Ismaila Shittu:</b> investigation, methodology, validation, writing – original draft, writing – review and editing, data curation, formal analysis, conceptualization, visualization. <b>Daniel B. Cummings:</b> investigation, methodology, writing – review and editing. <b>John T. Groves:</b> investigation, methodology, writing – review and editing. <b>Alex G. Hagan:</b> investigation, methodology, writing – review and editing. <b>Gregory C. Gray:</b> writing – original draft, writing – review and editing, conceptualization, funding acquisition, project administration, resources, supervision, methodology, investigation.</p><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest.</p>","PeriodicalId":13544,"journal":{"name":"Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses","volume":"19 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/irv.70162","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Low Levels of Neutralizing Antibodies to Influenza A (H5N1) and D Viruses Among Cattle and Cattle Workers on US Farms, 2024–2025\",\"authors\":\"Ismaila Shittu,&nbsp;Daniel B. Cummings,&nbsp;John T. Groves,&nbsp;Alex G. Hagan,&nbsp;Gregory C. Gray\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/irv.70162\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Bovine respiratory disease complex (BRDC) is a major disease problem in cattle production systems. Numerous pathogens have been implicated as causing BRDC, including the recently discovered influenza D virus (IDV) [<span>1</span>]. IDV has been found to be highly enzootic in cattle across multiple continents [<span>1, 2</span>], and there is some evidence of spillover to livestock workers [<span>3, 4</span>]. In March 2024, unprecedented outbreaks of influenza A virus (IAV) H5N1 clade 2.3.4.4b were reported in the United States [<span>5</span>] with occasional spillover to dairy and poultry workers [<span>6, 7</span>]. Given the occupational threats of both IDV and IAV H5N1, we sought to assess the dynamics of antibodies to IAV H5N1 and IDV in farm workers and cattle.</p><p>As part of our One Health surveillance initiative in the United States and Mexico [<span>6, 8</span>], between April 2024 and May 2025 we enrolled a total of seven dairy and beef cattle farms in Indiana (<i>n</i> = 1), Kentucky (<i>n</i> = 3), and Texas (<i>n</i> = 2) (Table 1). Our visits to these farms took place on four separate occasions, permitting us to prospectively follow the farms. We obtained informed consent from every farm worker who participated in the study. Based on availability, we collected 5 to 10 mL of blood from both the cattle and the farm workers through venipuncture using a plain vacutainer tube (BD, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). After collection, the blood samples were centrifuged at 600 <i>g</i> for 15 min, and the serum was harvested and stored in microtubes at −20°C. Throughout the four visits, we collected 270 serum samples, which comprised 142 samples from cattle and 128 samples from farm workers (Table 1). Ethical approval for the study was granted by the University of Texas Medical Branch's Institutional Review Board (23-0085).</p><p>To determine the presence of neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) against IAV-H5 and IDV in both the cattle and farm workers sera, we conducted microneutralization (MN) assays. Briefly, serum samples were treated overnight (18–20 h) with Receptor Destroying Enzyme II (RDE; Denka Seiken, Tokyo, Japan) according to the manufacturer's instructions. This treatment was necessary to eliminate nonspecific inhibitors that could interfere with the assay. Starting with a dilution of 1:20 to 1:2560 RDE-treated sera, we used a recombinant H5N1 virus (rg-A/bald eagle/Florida/W22-134-OP/2022 of clade 2.3.4.4b) and a bovine-origin IDV strain (D/Bovine/Kansas/1-35/2010) on a monolayer of Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK; ATCC cat. no. CRL-CCL34) cells in 96-well plates following standard procedures with minor modifications [<span>4, 9</span>].</p><p>As measured by the MN assay, none of the enrolled beef cattle farm workers had NAbs antibodies to IAV-H5 during any of the four visits to the farms in Indiana, Kentucky, and Texas, except for the first visit to Texas (Table 1). During this visit, two dairy farm workers were found to have NAbs to IAV-H5 [<span>6</span>]. Furthermore, NAbs to IAV-H5 were not detected in any beef cattle tested during the four field visits in Indiana, Kentucky, and Texas. However, 19 of the 22 (73.3%) Texas dairy cattle on one farm showed elevated NAbs to IAV-H5 (Table 1). Additionally, at least 7 of 15 (46.7%) out of these dairy cattle maintained elevated NAbs levels during subsequent visits for over a year (Shittu et al., manuscript under journal review).</p><p>We found NAbs to IDV in one of 128 farm worker serum samples (0.8%). Notably, antibodies to IDV were consistently detected in the serum of this worker at every visit. This indicates that NAbs in individuals infected with IDV can persist for more than a year. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report documenting the persistence of antibodies to IDV in farm workers. This finding highlights the importance of monitoring immune responses in this population, who are often exposed to various pathogens in their work environment.</p><p>Understanding how long antibodies remain detectable can provide valuable insights into the immune system's effectiveness to clear invading pathogens and guide future health strategies for workers in agricultural settings. In the cattle, during the winter of 2024 (third visit), we detected NAbs against IDV exclusively in the beef cattle (Table 1). In Indiana, 2 of 6 beef cows (33.3%) tested positive for IDV NAbs. In Kentucky, 1 of 19 beef cows (5.3%) had IDV NAbs, while in Texas, 10 of 30 beef cows (22.2%) were found to have IDV NAbs (Table 1). Unlike IAV and other respiratory viruses with high incidences during winter [<span>10</span>], little is known about the seasonality of IDV. More extensive research should be conducted in establishing the seasonality of IDV in cattle to aid in control strategies. In conclusion, our study documents a low prevalence of neutralizing antibodies to IAV H5N1 and IDV in both cattle and cattle workers.</p><p><b>Ismaila Shittu:</b> investigation, methodology, validation, writing – original draft, writing – review and editing, data curation, formal analysis, conceptualization, visualization. <b>Daniel B. Cummings:</b> investigation, methodology, writing – review and editing. <b>John T. Groves:</b> investigation, methodology, writing – review and editing. <b>Alex G. Hagan:</b> investigation, methodology, writing – review and editing. <b>Gregory C. Gray:</b> writing – original draft, writing – review and editing, conceptualization, funding acquisition, project administration, resources, supervision, methodology, investigation.</p><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13544,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses\",\"volume\":\"19 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/irv.70162\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/irv.70162\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/irv.70162","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

牛呼吸道疾病(BRDC)是牛生产系统中的一个主要疾病问题。许多病原体都与BRDC有关,包括最近发现的D型流感病毒(IDV)[1]。已发现IDV在多个大陆的牛中高度地方性传播[1,2],并且有一些证据表明对畜牧工人有溢出[3,4]。2024年3月,美国报告了前所未有的甲型流感病毒(IAV) H5N1分支2.3.4.4b暴发,偶有乳业和家禽业工人感染[6,7]。鉴于IDV和IAV H5N1的职业威胁,我们试图评估农场工人和牛中IAV H5N1和IDV抗体的动态。作为我们在美国和墨西哥开展的“一个健康”(One Health)监测计划的一部分[6,8],在2024年4月至2025年5月期间,我们在印第安纳州(n = 1)、肯塔基州(n = 3)和德克萨斯州(n = 2)共招募了7个奶牛和肉牛农场(表1)。我们对这些农场的访问是在四个不同的场合进行的,这使我们能够前瞻性地跟踪这些农场。我们获得了每位参与研究的农场工人的知情同意。根据可用性,我们使用普通真空容器管(BD, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA)通过静脉穿刺从牛和农场工人身上采集了5 - 10ml血液。采集后,取血样600 g离心15 min,收获血清,保存于微管中,保存于- 20℃。在四次访问中,我们收集了270份血清样本,其中142份来自牛,128份来自农场工人(表1)。德克萨斯大学医学分支机构审查委员会(23-0085)批准了该研究的伦理许可。为了确定牛和农场工人血清中抗IAV-H5和IDV的中和抗体(nab)的存在,我们进行了微量中和(MN)测定。简单地说,根据制造商的说明,用受体破坏酶II (RDE; Denka Seiken,东京,日本)处理血清样本过夜(18-20小时)。这种治疗对于消除可能干扰检测的非特异性抑制剂是必要的。从1:20至1:2560稀释rde处理的血清开始,我们使用重组H5N1病毒(rg-A/秃鹰/佛罗里达/W22-134-OP/2022进化枝2.3.4.4b)和牛源IDV株(D/Bovine/Kansas/1-35/2010)在Madin-Darby犬肾(MDCK; ATCC猫)的单分子层上。否。CRL-CCL34)细胞在96孔板中按照标准程序进行少量修改[4,9]。根据MN测定,在印第安纳州、肯塔基州和德克萨斯州的农场进行的四次访问中,除了第一次访问德克萨斯州外,所有入组的肉牛农场工人都没有针对IAV-H5的nab抗体(表1)。在这次访问中,两名奶牛场工人被发现对IAV-H5[6]有抗体。此外,在印第安纳州、肯塔基州和德克萨斯州的四次实地考察中,未在任何肉牛中检测到针对IAV-H5的抗体。然而,在一个农场的22头德克萨斯奶牛中,有19头(73.3%)对IAV-H5的抗体升高(表1)。此外,15头奶牛中至少有7头(46.7%)在随后的一年多的访问中保持较高的nab水平(Shittu等人,手稿在期刊审稿中)。我们在128个农场工人的血清样本中发现了IDV抗体(0.8%)。值得注意的是,在每次访问中,该工人的血清中始终检测到IDV抗体。这表明感染IDV的人体内的nab可以持续一年以上。据我们所知,这是第一份记录农场工人体内持续存在IDV抗体的报告。这一发现强调了监测这一人群免疫反应的重要性,他们在工作环境中经常暴露于各种病原体。了解抗体保持可检测的时间可以为免疫系统清除入侵病原体的有效性提供有价值的见解,并指导农业环境中工人的未来健康策略。在牛中,在2024年冬季(第三次访问),我们仅在肉牛中检测到抗IDV的nab(表1)。在印第安纳州,6头肉牛中有2头(33.3%)检测出IDV抗体阳性。在肯塔基州,19头肉牛中有1头(5.3%)携带IDV抗体,而在德克萨斯州,30头肉牛中有10头(22.2%)携带IDV抗体(表1)。与IAV和其他呼吸道病毒在冬季高发不同,IDV的季节性知之甚少。应开展更广泛的研究,以确定牛IDV的季节性,以帮助制定控制战略。总之,我们的研究表明,在牛和牛工人中,IAV H5N1和IDV的中和抗体的流行率很低。Ismaila Shittu:调查,方法论,验证,写作-原稿,写作-审查和编辑,数据管理,形式分析,概念化,可视化。丹尼尔·B。 卡明斯:调查,方法论,写作-审查和编辑。约翰·t·格罗夫斯:调查,方法论,写作-评论和编辑。亚历克斯G.哈根:调查,方法论,写作-审查和编辑。格雷戈里·c·格雷:写作-原稿,写作-审查和编辑,构思,资金获取,项目管理,资源,监督,方法,调查。作者声明无利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Low Levels of Neutralizing Antibodies to Influenza A (H5N1) and D Viruses Among Cattle and Cattle Workers on US Farms, 2024–2025

Bovine respiratory disease complex (BRDC) is a major disease problem in cattle production systems. Numerous pathogens have been implicated as causing BRDC, including the recently discovered influenza D virus (IDV) [1]. IDV has been found to be highly enzootic in cattle across multiple continents [1, 2], and there is some evidence of spillover to livestock workers [3, 4]. In March 2024, unprecedented outbreaks of influenza A virus (IAV) H5N1 clade 2.3.4.4b were reported in the United States [5] with occasional spillover to dairy and poultry workers [6, 7]. Given the occupational threats of both IDV and IAV H5N1, we sought to assess the dynamics of antibodies to IAV H5N1 and IDV in farm workers and cattle.

As part of our One Health surveillance initiative in the United States and Mexico [6, 8], between April 2024 and May 2025 we enrolled a total of seven dairy and beef cattle farms in Indiana (n = 1), Kentucky (n = 3), and Texas (n = 2) (Table 1). Our visits to these farms took place on four separate occasions, permitting us to prospectively follow the farms. We obtained informed consent from every farm worker who participated in the study. Based on availability, we collected 5 to 10 mL of blood from both the cattle and the farm workers through venipuncture using a plain vacutainer tube (BD, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). After collection, the blood samples were centrifuged at 600 g for 15 min, and the serum was harvested and stored in microtubes at −20°C. Throughout the four visits, we collected 270 serum samples, which comprised 142 samples from cattle and 128 samples from farm workers (Table 1). Ethical approval for the study was granted by the University of Texas Medical Branch's Institutional Review Board (23-0085).

To determine the presence of neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) against IAV-H5 and IDV in both the cattle and farm workers sera, we conducted microneutralization (MN) assays. Briefly, serum samples were treated overnight (18–20 h) with Receptor Destroying Enzyme II (RDE; Denka Seiken, Tokyo, Japan) according to the manufacturer's instructions. This treatment was necessary to eliminate nonspecific inhibitors that could interfere with the assay. Starting with a dilution of 1:20 to 1:2560 RDE-treated sera, we used a recombinant H5N1 virus (rg-A/bald eagle/Florida/W22-134-OP/2022 of clade 2.3.4.4b) and a bovine-origin IDV strain (D/Bovine/Kansas/1-35/2010) on a monolayer of Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK; ATCC cat. no. CRL-CCL34) cells in 96-well plates following standard procedures with minor modifications [4, 9].

As measured by the MN assay, none of the enrolled beef cattle farm workers had NAbs antibodies to IAV-H5 during any of the four visits to the farms in Indiana, Kentucky, and Texas, except for the first visit to Texas (Table 1). During this visit, two dairy farm workers were found to have NAbs to IAV-H5 [6]. Furthermore, NAbs to IAV-H5 were not detected in any beef cattle tested during the four field visits in Indiana, Kentucky, and Texas. However, 19 of the 22 (73.3%) Texas dairy cattle on one farm showed elevated NAbs to IAV-H5 (Table 1). Additionally, at least 7 of 15 (46.7%) out of these dairy cattle maintained elevated NAbs levels during subsequent visits for over a year (Shittu et al., manuscript under journal review).

We found NAbs to IDV in one of 128 farm worker serum samples (0.8%). Notably, antibodies to IDV were consistently detected in the serum of this worker at every visit. This indicates that NAbs in individuals infected with IDV can persist for more than a year. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report documenting the persistence of antibodies to IDV in farm workers. This finding highlights the importance of monitoring immune responses in this population, who are often exposed to various pathogens in their work environment.

Understanding how long antibodies remain detectable can provide valuable insights into the immune system's effectiveness to clear invading pathogens and guide future health strategies for workers in agricultural settings. In the cattle, during the winter of 2024 (third visit), we detected NAbs against IDV exclusively in the beef cattle (Table 1). In Indiana, 2 of 6 beef cows (33.3%) tested positive for IDV NAbs. In Kentucky, 1 of 19 beef cows (5.3%) had IDV NAbs, while in Texas, 10 of 30 beef cows (22.2%) were found to have IDV NAbs (Table 1). Unlike IAV and other respiratory viruses with high incidences during winter [10], little is known about the seasonality of IDV. More extensive research should be conducted in establishing the seasonality of IDV in cattle to aid in control strategies. In conclusion, our study documents a low prevalence of neutralizing antibodies to IAV H5N1 and IDV in both cattle and cattle workers.

Ismaila Shittu: investigation, methodology, validation, writing – original draft, writing – review and editing, data curation, formal analysis, conceptualization, visualization. Daniel B. Cummings: investigation, methodology, writing – review and editing. John T. Groves: investigation, methodology, writing – review and editing. Alex G. Hagan: investigation, methodology, writing – review and editing. Gregory C. Gray: writing – original draft, writing – review and editing, conceptualization, funding acquisition, project administration, resources, supervision, methodology, investigation.

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.50%
发文量
120
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses is the official journal of the International Society of Influenza and Other Respiratory Virus Diseases - an independent scientific professional society - dedicated to promoting the prevention, detection, treatment, and control of influenza and other respiratory virus diseases. Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses is an Open Access journal. Copyright on any research article published by Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses is retained by the author(s). Authors grant Wiley a license to publish the article and identify itself as the original publisher. Authors also grant any third party the right to use the article freely as long as its integrity is maintained and its original authors, citation details and publisher are identified.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信