大规模群体决策中的动态信任共识模型:过度自信与非合作行为的管理

IF 2.7 3区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS
Xia Liang, Ying Chen, Peide Liu, Zhengmin Liu
{"title":"大规模群体决策中的动态信任共识模型:过度自信与非合作行为的管理","authors":"Xia Liang,&nbsp;Ying Chen,&nbsp;Peide Liu,&nbsp;Zhengmin Liu","doi":"10.1002/mde.4560","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>In this paper, we propose a dynamic trust consensus model, considering the closeness of the relationship and trust relationship between decision makers (DMs) in a social network. First, the propagation efficiency of indirect trust is proposed for obtaining a complete social trust network based on the closeness of relationships among DMs and the similarity of evaluations. The large-scale DMs are clustered into subgroups using the social-similarity index between DMs. In the consensus reaching process (CRP), this paper proposes a new way to identify overconfident and non-cooperative behaviors. For overconfident and inconsistent DMs, it is essential to not only adjust their evaluated values but also reduce their confidence levels in the feedback adjustment stage. This paper proposes a new dynamic trust approach to penalize DMs with overconfident or non-cooperative behaviors. Finally, an investment problem of a new energy project is used to test the feasibility of the proposed approach in this paper. The results of the comparative analysis illustrate the feasibility and innovation of the consensus decision-making method proposed in this paper.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":18186,"journal":{"name":"Managerial and Decision Economics","volume":"46 7","pages":"3875-3894"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Dynamic Trust Consensus Model in Large-Scale Group Decision: Managing Overconfidence and Non-Cooperative Behaviors\",\"authors\":\"Xia Liang,&nbsp;Ying Chen,&nbsp;Peide Liu,&nbsp;Zhengmin Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/mde.4560\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>In this paper, we propose a dynamic trust consensus model, considering the closeness of the relationship and trust relationship between decision makers (DMs) in a social network. First, the propagation efficiency of indirect trust is proposed for obtaining a complete social trust network based on the closeness of relationships among DMs and the similarity of evaluations. The large-scale DMs are clustered into subgroups using the social-similarity index between DMs. In the consensus reaching process (CRP), this paper proposes a new way to identify overconfident and non-cooperative behaviors. For overconfident and inconsistent DMs, it is essential to not only adjust their evaluated values but also reduce their confidence levels in the feedback adjustment stage. This paper proposes a new dynamic trust approach to penalize DMs with overconfident or non-cooperative behaviors. Finally, an investment problem of a new energy project is used to test the feasibility of the proposed approach in this paper. The results of the comparative analysis illustrate the feasibility and innovation of the consensus decision-making method proposed in this paper.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18186,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Managerial and Decision Economics\",\"volume\":\"46 7\",\"pages\":\"3875-3894\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Managerial and Decision Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mde.4560\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Managerial and Decision Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mde.4560","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本文中,我们提出了一个动态信任共识模型,该模型考虑了社会网络中决策者之间的关系和信任关系的密切性。首先,提出间接信任的传播效率,基于决策主体之间关系的密切程度和评价的相似度,构建完整的社会信任网络;使用社会相似性指数将大规模的dm聚类到子组中。在共识达成过程中,提出了一种识别过度自信和非合作行为的新方法。对于过度自信和不一致的决策模型,在反馈调整阶段不仅要调整其评估值,还要降低其置信度。本文提出了一种新的动态信任方法来惩罚具有过度自信或不合作行为的决策决策者。最后,以一个新能源项目的投资问题为例,验证了本文方法的可行性。对比分析的结果说明了本文提出的共识决策方法的可行性和创新性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Dynamic Trust Consensus Model in Large-Scale Group Decision: Managing Overconfidence and Non-Cooperative Behaviors

In this paper, we propose a dynamic trust consensus model, considering the closeness of the relationship and trust relationship between decision makers (DMs) in a social network. First, the propagation efficiency of indirect trust is proposed for obtaining a complete social trust network based on the closeness of relationships among DMs and the similarity of evaluations. The large-scale DMs are clustered into subgroups using the social-similarity index between DMs. In the consensus reaching process (CRP), this paper proposes a new way to identify overconfident and non-cooperative behaviors. For overconfident and inconsistent DMs, it is essential to not only adjust their evaluated values but also reduce their confidence levels in the feedback adjustment stage. This paper proposes a new dynamic trust approach to penalize DMs with overconfident or non-cooperative behaviors. Finally, an investment problem of a new energy project is used to test the feasibility of the proposed approach in this paper. The results of the comparative analysis illustrate the feasibility and innovation of the consensus decision-making method proposed in this paper.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
18.20%
发文量
242
期刊介绍: Managerial and Decision Economics will publish articles applying economic reasoning to managerial decision-making and management strategy.Management strategy concerns practical decisions that managers face about how to compete, how to succeed, and how to organize to achieve their goals. Economic thinking and analysis provides a critical foundation for strategic decision-making across a variety of dimensions. For example, economic insights may help in determining which activities to outsource and which to perfom internally. They can help unravel questions regarding what drives performance differences among firms and what allows these differences to persist. They can contribute to an appreciation of how industries, organizations, and capabilities evolve.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信