在虚拟现实中形成的印痕在检索时显示出降低的熟悉度:源记忆检索的电生理相关表明识别记忆的模态依赖性差异

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Joanna Kisker, Marius Soethe, Jonas Sieverding, Leon Lange, Merle Sagehorn, Benjamin Schöne, Thomas Gruber
{"title":"在虚拟现实中形成的印痕在检索时显示出降低的熟悉度:源记忆检索的电生理相关表明识别记忆的模态依赖性差异","authors":"Joanna Kisker,&nbsp;Marius Soethe,&nbsp;Jonas Sieverding,&nbsp;Leon Lange,&nbsp;Merle Sagehorn,&nbsp;Benjamin Schöne,&nbsp;Thomas Gruber","doi":"10.1111/ejn.70239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Initial findings linking Virtual Reality (VR)-based encoding to increased recollection at retrieval remain inconclusive due to heterogeneous study designs and dependence on behavioral data. To clarify under which circumstances VR-based encoding affects or enhances episodic memory retrieval, the fundamental question remains whether the encoding modality, i.e., VR or 2D-desktops (PC), functions as a source for recollection, independent of further contextual factors. Specifically, the electrophysiological correlates (EEG) of item and source memory could objectively determine whether source retrieval fosters recollection and attenuates familiarity of VR-encoded information (i.e., VR-engrams) compared to PC-encoded information (i.e., PC-engrams).</p><p>To this end, participants incidentally encoded everyday objects in VR and on a 2D desktop in a within-subjects design, followed by unannounced old/new and source identification tasks. Our results indicate that encoding modality affects item memory only to a limited degree: Recognition memory performance, alongside the electrophysiological markers of item memory, i.e., the frontal and parietal old/new effects (FN400, LPC) and the theta band response, yielded comparable results for both engrams. Yet source memory differs depending on the encoding modality: The late posterior negativity indicated a shift towards recollection regarding the retrieval of VR-engrams compared to PC-engrams. This shift might result from attenuated familiarity with VR-engrams, particularly reflected in the alpha band and phase-amplitude coupling of theta and gamma band. In conclusion, encoding modality functions to some degree as a relevant source for recognition memory. Yet our results propose that familiarity is more strongly affected than recollection if contextual information beyond dimensionality is matched between encoding modalities.</p>","PeriodicalId":11993,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Neuroscience","volume":"62 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ejn.70239","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Engrams Formed in Virtual Reality Exhibit Reduced Familiarity Upon Retrieval: Electrophysiological Correlates of Source Memory Retrieval Indicate Modality-Dependent Differences in Recognition Memory\",\"authors\":\"Joanna Kisker,&nbsp;Marius Soethe,&nbsp;Jonas Sieverding,&nbsp;Leon Lange,&nbsp;Merle Sagehorn,&nbsp;Benjamin Schöne,&nbsp;Thomas Gruber\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ejn.70239\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Initial findings linking Virtual Reality (VR)-based encoding to increased recollection at retrieval remain inconclusive due to heterogeneous study designs and dependence on behavioral data. To clarify under which circumstances VR-based encoding affects or enhances episodic memory retrieval, the fundamental question remains whether the encoding modality, i.e., VR or 2D-desktops (PC), functions as a source for recollection, independent of further contextual factors. Specifically, the electrophysiological correlates (EEG) of item and source memory could objectively determine whether source retrieval fosters recollection and attenuates familiarity of VR-encoded information (i.e., VR-engrams) compared to PC-encoded information (i.e., PC-engrams).</p><p>To this end, participants incidentally encoded everyday objects in VR and on a 2D desktop in a within-subjects design, followed by unannounced old/new and source identification tasks. Our results indicate that encoding modality affects item memory only to a limited degree: Recognition memory performance, alongside the electrophysiological markers of item memory, i.e., the frontal and parietal old/new effects (FN400, LPC) and the theta band response, yielded comparable results for both engrams. Yet source memory differs depending on the encoding modality: The late posterior negativity indicated a shift towards recollection regarding the retrieval of VR-engrams compared to PC-engrams. This shift might result from attenuated familiarity with VR-engrams, particularly reflected in the alpha band and phase-amplitude coupling of theta and gamma band. In conclusion, encoding modality functions to some degree as a relevant source for recognition memory. Yet our results propose that familiarity is more strongly affected than recollection if contextual information beyond dimensionality is matched between encoding modalities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11993,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Neuroscience\",\"volume\":\"62 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ejn.70239\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejn.70239\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejn.70239","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于不同的研究设计和对行为数据的依赖,将基于虚拟现实(VR)的编码与检索时记忆增加联系起来的初步研究结果仍不确定。为了澄清基于VR的编码在哪些情况下会影响或增强情景记忆检索,基本问题仍然是编码方式,即VR或2d桌面(PC),是否作为回忆的来源,独立于进一步的上下文因素。具体而言,项目记忆和源记忆的电生理相关(EEG)可以客观地确定源检索是否促进回忆,并减弱对虚拟现实编码信息(即虚拟现实记忆)的熟悉程度,而不是pc编码信息(即pc记忆)。为此,参与者在VR和2D桌面设计中偶然编码了日常物品,然后是未宣布的新旧和来源识别任务。我们的研究结果表明,编码方式仅在有限程度上影响项目记忆:识别记忆的表现,以及项目记忆的电生理标记,即额叶和顶叶的新旧效应(FN400, LPC)和θ波段响应,对两个印迹产生了相似的结果。然而,源记忆因编码方式的不同而不同:后期后验负性表明,与pc记忆相比,vr记忆更倾向于回忆。这种转变可能是由于对vr印记的熟悉程度降低,特别是反映在α波段和θ和γ波段的相位振幅耦合中。综上所述,编码方式在一定程度上是识别记忆的相关来源。然而,我们的研究结果表明,如果超越维度的上下文信息在编码模式之间匹配,熟悉度比回忆更受影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Engrams Formed in Virtual Reality Exhibit Reduced Familiarity Upon Retrieval: Electrophysiological Correlates of Source Memory Retrieval Indicate Modality-Dependent Differences in Recognition Memory

Engrams Formed in Virtual Reality Exhibit Reduced Familiarity Upon Retrieval: Electrophysiological Correlates of Source Memory Retrieval Indicate Modality-Dependent Differences in Recognition Memory

Initial findings linking Virtual Reality (VR)-based encoding to increased recollection at retrieval remain inconclusive due to heterogeneous study designs and dependence on behavioral data. To clarify under which circumstances VR-based encoding affects or enhances episodic memory retrieval, the fundamental question remains whether the encoding modality, i.e., VR or 2D-desktops (PC), functions as a source for recollection, independent of further contextual factors. Specifically, the electrophysiological correlates (EEG) of item and source memory could objectively determine whether source retrieval fosters recollection and attenuates familiarity of VR-encoded information (i.e., VR-engrams) compared to PC-encoded information (i.e., PC-engrams).

To this end, participants incidentally encoded everyday objects in VR and on a 2D desktop in a within-subjects design, followed by unannounced old/new and source identification tasks. Our results indicate that encoding modality affects item memory only to a limited degree: Recognition memory performance, alongside the electrophysiological markers of item memory, i.e., the frontal and parietal old/new effects (FN400, LPC) and the theta band response, yielded comparable results for both engrams. Yet source memory differs depending on the encoding modality: The late posterior negativity indicated a shift towards recollection regarding the retrieval of VR-engrams compared to PC-engrams. This shift might result from attenuated familiarity with VR-engrams, particularly reflected in the alpha band and phase-amplitude coupling of theta and gamma band. In conclusion, encoding modality functions to some degree as a relevant source for recognition memory. Yet our results propose that familiarity is more strongly affected than recollection if contextual information beyond dimensionality is matched between encoding modalities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Neuroscience
European Journal of Neuroscience 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
5.90%
发文量
305
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: EJN is the journal of FENS and supports the international neuroscientific community by publishing original high quality research articles and reviews in all fields of neuroscience. In addition, to engage with issues that are of interest to the science community, we also publish Editorials, Meetings Reports and Neuro-Opinions on topics that are of current interest in the fields of neuroscience research and training in science. We have recently established a series of ‘Profiles of Women in Neuroscience’. Our goal is to provide a vehicle for publications that further the understanding of the structure and function of the nervous system in both health and disease and to provide a vehicle to engage the neuroscience community. As the official journal of FENS, profits from the journal are re-invested in the neuroscientific community through the activities of FENS.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信