基于遗传算法的多暴雨重现期鲁棒蓝绿城市洪水风险管理

IF 3 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Asid Ur Rehman, Vassilis Glenis, Elizabeth Lewis, Chris Kilsby, Claire Walsh
{"title":"基于遗传算法的多暴雨重现期鲁棒蓝绿城市洪水风险管理","authors":"Asid Ur Rehman,&nbsp;Vassilis Glenis,&nbsp;Elizabeth Lewis,&nbsp;Chris Kilsby,&nbsp;Claire Walsh","doi":"10.1111/jfr3.70118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Flood risk managers seek to optimise Blue-Green Infrastructure (BGI) designs to maximise return on investment. Current systems often use optimisation algorithms and detailed flood models to maximise benefit–cost ratios for single rainstorm return periods. However, the BGI scheme optimised for one return period (e.g., 100 years) may differ significantly from those optimised for others (e.g., 10 or 20 years). This study aims to assess the effectiveness of single return period-based BGI design across multiple storm magnitudes and introduces a novel multi-objective optimisation framework that simultaneously incorporates five return periods (T = 10, 20, 30, 50 and 100 years). The framework combines a non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGA-II) with a fully distributed hydrodynamic model to optimise the spatial placement and combined size of BGI features. For the first time, direct damage cost (DDC) and expected annual damage (EAD), calculated for various building types, are used as risk objective functions, transforming a many-objective problem into a multi-objective one. Performance metrics such as Median and Maximum Risk Difference (MedRD, MaxRD) between reference and trial Pareto fronts, capturing characteristic single values from the distribution of risk differences, and the Area Under Pareto Front (AUPF), indicating overall optimisation quality, reveal that a 100-year optimised BGI design performs poorly when evaluated for other return periods, particularly shorter ones. In contrast, a BGI design optimised using composite return periods enhances performance metrics across all return periods, with the greatest improvements observed in MedRD (22%) and AUPF (73%) for the 20-year return period, and MaxRD (23%) for the 50-year return period. Furthermore, climate uplift stress testing confirms the robustness of the proposed design to future rainfall extremes. This study advocates a paradigm shift in flood risk management, moving from single maximum to multiple rainstorms-based optimised designs to enhance resilience and adaptability to future climate extremes.</p>","PeriodicalId":49294,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Flood Risk Management","volume":"18 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jfr3.70118","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Robust Blue-Green Urban Flood Risk Management Optimised With a Genetic Algorithm for Multiple Rainstorm Return Periods\",\"authors\":\"Asid Ur Rehman,&nbsp;Vassilis Glenis,&nbsp;Elizabeth Lewis,&nbsp;Chris Kilsby,&nbsp;Claire Walsh\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jfr3.70118\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Flood risk managers seek to optimise Blue-Green Infrastructure (BGI) designs to maximise return on investment. Current systems often use optimisation algorithms and detailed flood models to maximise benefit–cost ratios for single rainstorm return periods. However, the BGI scheme optimised for one return period (e.g., 100 years) may differ significantly from those optimised for others (e.g., 10 or 20 years). This study aims to assess the effectiveness of single return period-based BGI design across multiple storm magnitudes and introduces a novel multi-objective optimisation framework that simultaneously incorporates five return periods (T = 10, 20, 30, 50 and 100 years). The framework combines a non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGA-II) with a fully distributed hydrodynamic model to optimise the spatial placement and combined size of BGI features. For the first time, direct damage cost (DDC) and expected annual damage (EAD), calculated for various building types, are used as risk objective functions, transforming a many-objective problem into a multi-objective one. Performance metrics such as Median and Maximum Risk Difference (MedRD, MaxRD) between reference and trial Pareto fronts, capturing characteristic single values from the distribution of risk differences, and the Area Under Pareto Front (AUPF), indicating overall optimisation quality, reveal that a 100-year optimised BGI design performs poorly when evaluated for other return periods, particularly shorter ones. In contrast, a BGI design optimised using composite return periods enhances performance metrics across all return periods, with the greatest improvements observed in MedRD (22%) and AUPF (73%) for the 20-year return period, and MaxRD (23%) for the 50-year return period. Furthermore, climate uplift stress testing confirms the robustness of the proposed design to future rainfall extremes. This study advocates a paradigm shift in flood risk management, moving from single maximum to multiple rainstorms-based optimised designs to enhance resilience and adaptability to future climate extremes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49294,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Flood Risk Management\",\"volume\":\"18 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jfr3.70118\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Flood Risk Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jfr3.70118\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Flood Risk Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jfr3.70118","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

洪水风险管理者寻求优化蓝绿基础设施(BGI)设计,以最大化投资回报。目前的系统通常使用优化算法和详细的洪水模型来最大化单次暴雨复发期的效益-成本比。然而,针对一个回报期(例如100年)优化的BGI方案可能与针对其他回报期(例如10年或20年)优化的方案存在显著差异。本研究旨在评估基于单一回归期的BGI设计在多个风暴量级上的有效性,并引入了一个新的多目标优化框架,该框架同时包含五个回归期(T = 10、20、30、50和100年)。该框架将非支配排序遗传算法II (NSGA-II)与全分布式水动力模型相结合,对华大基因特征的空间布局和组合大小进行优化。首次将不同建筑类型的直接损失成本(DDC)和预期年损失(EAD)作为风险目标函数,将多目标问题转化为多目标问题。参考和试验帕累托前沿之间的中位数和最大风险差(MedRD, MaxRD)等性能指标,从风险差的分布中获取特征单值,以及表明整体优化质量的帕累托前沿下面积(AUPF),表明100年优化的华大基因设计在其他回报期(特别是较短的回报期)评估时表现不佳。相比之下,使用复合回报期进行优化的BGI设计提高了所有回报期的性能指标,20年回报期的MedRD(22%)和AUPF(73%)改善最大,50年回报期的MaxRD(23%)改善最大。此外,气候隆起应力测试证实了所提出的设计对未来极端降雨的稳健性。这项研究提倡在洪水风险管理方面进行范式转变,从单一的最大暴雨转向基于多个暴雨的优化设计,以增强对未来极端气候的抵御能力和适应性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Robust Blue-Green Urban Flood Risk Management Optimised With a Genetic Algorithm for Multiple Rainstorm Return Periods

Robust Blue-Green Urban Flood Risk Management Optimised With a Genetic Algorithm for Multiple Rainstorm Return Periods

Flood risk managers seek to optimise Blue-Green Infrastructure (BGI) designs to maximise return on investment. Current systems often use optimisation algorithms and detailed flood models to maximise benefit–cost ratios for single rainstorm return periods. However, the BGI scheme optimised for one return period (e.g., 100 years) may differ significantly from those optimised for others (e.g., 10 or 20 years). This study aims to assess the effectiveness of single return period-based BGI design across multiple storm magnitudes and introduces a novel multi-objective optimisation framework that simultaneously incorporates five return periods (T = 10, 20, 30, 50 and 100 years). The framework combines a non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGA-II) with a fully distributed hydrodynamic model to optimise the spatial placement and combined size of BGI features. For the first time, direct damage cost (DDC) and expected annual damage (EAD), calculated for various building types, are used as risk objective functions, transforming a many-objective problem into a multi-objective one. Performance metrics such as Median and Maximum Risk Difference (MedRD, MaxRD) between reference and trial Pareto fronts, capturing characteristic single values from the distribution of risk differences, and the Area Under Pareto Front (AUPF), indicating overall optimisation quality, reveal that a 100-year optimised BGI design performs poorly when evaluated for other return periods, particularly shorter ones. In contrast, a BGI design optimised using composite return periods enhances performance metrics across all return periods, with the greatest improvements observed in MedRD (22%) and AUPF (73%) for the 20-year return period, and MaxRD (23%) for the 50-year return period. Furthermore, climate uplift stress testing confirms the robustness of the proposed design to future rainfall extremes. This study advocates a paradigm shift in flood risk management, moving from single maximum to multiple rainstorms-based optimised designs to enhance resilience and adaptability to future climate extremes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Flood Risk Management
Journal of Flood Risk Management ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES-WATER RESOURCES
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
7.30%
发文量
93
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Flood Risk Management provides an international platform for knowledge sharing in all areas related to flood risk. Its explicit aim is to disseminate ideas across the range of disciplines where flood related research is carried out and it provides content ranging from leading edge academic papers to applied content with the practitioner in mind. Readers and authors come from a wide background and include hydrologists, meteorologists, geographers, geomorphologists, conservationists, civil engineers, social scientists, policy makers, insurers and practitioners. They share an interest in managing the complex interactions between the many skills and disciplines that underpin the management of flood risk across the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信