竞争政策与企业劳动投资效率:来自中国的证据

IF 2.7 3区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS
Ming Chen, Linghao Yan
{"title":"竞争政策与企业劳动投资效率:来自中国的证据","authors":"Ming Chen,&nbsp;Linghao Yan","doi":"10.1002/mde.4553","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Competition policy plays an important role in maintaining market competition. However, its effectiveness is not yet well understood, particularly in developing countries. China's Fair Competition Review System (FCRS) shifts the focus from correcting monopolies after the fact to preventing anti-competitive policies in advance. This approach effectively lowers administrative monopolies, thus reducing inefficient labor investments. We investigate how competition policy affects firm efficiency in developing countries, where administrative monopolies are widespread. Because labor investment efficiency is highly sensitive to regional administrative monopolies, we use it as our central outcome. Leveraging the FCRS as a quasi-natural experiment, we show that competition policy significantly improves firms' labor investment efficiency in regions with higher levels of administrative monopoly. Further analysis indicates that competition policy enhances firm efficiency by increasing market competition and reducing firms' environmental uncertainty. The effects are especially strong in state-owned enterprises. Overall, our findings underscore that managing administrative monopolies is crucial for improving labor investment efficiency.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":18186,"journal":{"name":"Managerial and Decision Economics","volume":"46 7","pages":"3729-3747"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Competition Policy and Corporate Labor Investment Efficiency: Evidence From China\",\"authors\":\"Ming Chen,&nbsp;Linghao Yan\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/mde.4553\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Competition policy plays an important role in maintaining market competition. However, its effectiveness is not yet well understood, particularly in developing countries. China's Fair Competition Review System (FCRS) shifts the focus from correcting monopolies after the fact to preventing anti-competitive policies in advance. This approach effectively lowers administrative monopolies, thus reducing inefficient labor investments. We investigate how competition policy affects firm efficiency in developing countries, where administrative monopolies are widespread. Because labor investment efficiency is highly sensitive to regional administrative monopolies, we use it as our central outcome. Leveraging the FCRS as a quasi-natural experiment, we show that competition policy significantly improves firms' labor investment efficiency in regions with higher levels of administrative monopoly. Further analysis indicates that competition policy enhances firm efficiency by increasing market competition and reducing firms' environmental uncertainty. The effects are especially strong in state-owned enterprises. Overall, our findings underscore that managing administrative monopolies is crucial for improving labor investment efficiency.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18186,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Managerial and Decision Economics\",\"volume\":\"46 7\",\"pages\":\"3729-3747\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Managerial and Decision Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mde.4553\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Managerial and Decision Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mde.4553","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

竞争政策在维护市场竞争中起着重要的作用。然而,其有效性尚未得到充分了解,特别是在发展中国家。中国的公平竞争审查制度(FCRS)将重点从事后纠正垄断转向预先预防反竞争政策。这种方法有效地降低了行政垄断,从而减少了低效的劳动力投资。我们研究了在行政垄断普遍存在的发展中国家,竞争政策如何影响企业效率。由于劳动投资效率对区域行政垄断高度敏感,我们将其作为中心结果。利用FCRS作为准自然实验,我们发现在行政垄断程度较高的地区,竞争政策显著提高了企业的劳动投资效率。进一步分析表明,竞争政策通过增加市场竞争和降低企业环境不确定性来提高企业效率。这种影响在国有企业中尤为明显。总体而言,我们的研究结果强调,管理行政垄断对提高劳动投资效率至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Competition Policy and Corporate Labor Investment Efficiency: Evidence From China

Competition policy plays an important role in maintaining market competition. However, its effectiveness is not yet well understood, particularly in developing countries. China's Fair Competition Review System (FCRS) shifts the focus from correcting monopolies after the fact to preventing anti-competitive policies in advance. This approach effectively lowers administrative monopolies, thus reducing inefficient labor investments. We investigate how competition policy affects firm efficiency in developing countries, where administrative monopolies are widespread. Because labor investment efficiency is highly sensitive to regional administrative monopolies, we use it as our central outcome. Leveraging the FCRS as a quasi-natural experiment, we show that competition policy significantly improves firms' labor investment efficiency in regions with higher levels of administrative monopoly. Further analysis indicates that competition policy enhances firm efficiency by increasing market competition and reducing firms' environmental uncertainty. The effects are especially strong in state-owned enterprises. Overall, our findings underscore that managing administrative monopolies is crucial for improving labor investment efficiency.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
18.20%
发文量
242
期刊介绍: Managerial and Decision Economics will publish articles applying economic reasoning to managerial decision-making and management strategy.Management strategy concerns practical decisions that managers face about how to compete, how to succeed, and how to organize to achieve their goals. Economic thinking and analysis provides a critical foundation for strategic decision-making across a variety of dimensions. For example, economic insights may help in determining which activities to outsource and which to perfom internally. They can help unravel questions regarding what drives performance differences among firms and what allows these differences to persist. They can contribute to an appreciation of how industries, organizations, and capabilities evolve.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信