{"title":"竞争政策与企业劳动投资效率:来自中国的证据","authors":"Ming Chen, Linghao Yan","doi":"10.1002/mde.4553","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Competition policy plays an important role in maintaining market competition. However, its effectiveness is not yet well understood, particularly in developing countries. China's Fair Competition Review System (FCRS) shifts the focus from correcting monopolies after the fact to preventing anti-competitive policies in advance. This approach effectively lowers administrative monopolies, thus reducing inefficient labor investments. We investigate how competition policy affects firm efficiency in developing countries, where administrative monopolies are widespread. Because labor investment efficiency is highly sensitive to regional administrative monopolies, we use it as our central outcome. Leveraging the FCRS as a quasi-natural experiment, we show that competition policy significantly improves firms' labor investment efficiency in regions with higher levels of administrative monopoly. Further analysis indicates that competition policy enhances firm efficiency by increasing market competition and reducing firms' environmental uncertainty. The effects are especially strong in state-owned enterprises. Overall, our findings underscore that managing administrative monopolies is crucial for improving labor investment efficiency.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":18186,"journal":{"name":"Managerial and Decision Economics","volume":"46 7","pages":"3729-3747"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Competition Policy and Corporate Labor Investment Efficiency: Evidence From China\",\"authors\":\"Ming Chen, Linghao Yan\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/mde.4553\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Competition policy plays an important role in maintaining market competition. However, its effectiveness is not yet well understood, particularly in developing countries. China's Fair Competition Review System (FCRS) shifts the focus from correcting monopolies after the fact to preventing anti-competitive policies in advance. This approach effectively lowers administrative monopolies, thus reducing inefficient labor investments. We investigate how competition policy affects firm efficiency in developing countries, where administrative monopolies are widespread. Because labor investment efficiency is highly sensitive to regional administrative monopolies, we use it as our central outcome. Leveraging the FCRS as a quasi-natural experiment, we show that competition policy significantly improves firms' labor investment efficiency in regions with higher levels of administrative monopoly. Further analysis indicates that competition policy enhances firm efficiency by increasing market competition and reducing firms' environmental uncertainty. The effects are especially strong in state-owned enterprises. Overall, our findings underscore that managing administrative monopolies is crucial for improving labor investment efficiency.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18186,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Managerial and Decision Economics\",\"volume\":\"46 7\",\"pages\":\"3729-3747\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Managerial and Decision Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mde.4553\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Managerial and Decision Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mde.4553","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Competition Policy and Corporate Labor Investment Efficiency: Evidence From China
Competition policy plays an important role in maintaining market competition. However, its effectiveness is not yet well understood, particularly in developing countries. China's Fair Competition Review System (FCRS) shifts the focus from correcting monopolies after the fact to preventing anti-competitive policies in advance. This approach effectively lowers administrative monopolies, thus reducing inefficient labor investments. We investigate how competition policy affects firm efficiency in developing countries, where administrative monopolies are widespread. Because labor investment efficiency is highly sensitive to regional administrative monopolies, we use it as our central outcome. Leveraging the FCRS as a quasi-natural experiment, we show that competition policy significantly improves firms' labor investment efficiency in regions with higher levels of administrative monopoly. Further analysis indicates that competition policy enhances firm efficiency by increasing market competition and reducing firms' environmental uncertainty. The effects are especially strong in state-owned enterprises. Overall, our findings underscore that managing administrative monopolies is crucial for improving labor investment efficiency.
期刊介绍:
Managerial and Decision Economics will publish articles applying economic reasoning to managerial decision-making and management strategy.Management strategy concerns practical decisions that managers face about how to compete, how to succeed, and how to organize to achieve their goals. Economic thinking and analysis provides a critical foundation for strategic decision-making across a variety of dimensions. For example, economic insights may help in determining which activities to outsource and which to perfom internally. They can help unravel questions regarding what drives performance differences among firms and what allows these differences to persist. They can contribute to an appreciation of how industries, organizations, and capabilities evolve.