在某癌症中心实施机器人胰腺切除术项目期间,机器人胰腺切除术和开放式胰腺切除术的医院费用分析

IF 3.3 4区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Heather G. Lyu, Yuki Hirata, Pamela W. Lu, Jess E. Maxwell, Rebecca A. Snyder, Michael P. Kim, Hop Tran Cao, Ching-Wei D. Tzeng, Matthew H. G. Katz, Naruhiko Ikoma
{"title":"在某癌症中心实施机器人胰腺切除术项目期间,机器人胰腺切除术和开放式胰腺切除术的医院费用分析","authors":"Heather G. Lyu,&nbsp;Yuki Hirata,&nbsp;Pamela W. Lu,&nbsp;Jess E. Maxwell,&nbsp;Rebecca A. Snyder,&nbsp;Michael P. Kim,&nbsp;Hop Tran Cao,&nbsp;Ching-Wei D. Tzeng,&nbsp;Matthew H. G. Katz,&nbsp;Naruhiko Ikoma","doi":"10.1002/ags3.70017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Costs associated with robotic pancreatectomy compared to those of open pancreatectomy are assumed to be high but are not well known, particularly during the initial implementation of the robot.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Study Design</h3>\n \n <p>Patients who underwent pancreatectomy for any diagnosis from January 2017 to August 2021 were identified retrospectively. Total hospital cost was calculated using intraoperative, inpatient, and outpatient costs within 30 days of surgery. The ratio of the total cost of each pancreatectomy to the average cost of all operations at our center was used to represent cost without sharing proprietary financial data. Propensity score matching was performed to account for significant differences between the two groups.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>We identified 679 patients who underwent pancreatectomies, 88 of which were robotic. After propensity score matching, the open cohort had 176 patients, and the robotic cohort remained at 88 patients. The median hospital length of stay was 2 days shorter for robotic than for open pancreatectomy (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). The total hospital cost was markedly lower in the robotic pancreatectomy cohort. The inpatient and outpatient costs for robotic pancreatectomy were considerably lower than those for open pancreatectomy despite substantially higher intraoperative costs for the former procedure. A scatter plot of total costs after the initial adoption of the robot showed a trend of decreasing costs over time.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Overall, total hospital costs associated with robotic pancreatectomy were lower than those for open surgery, mainly driven by shorter length of stay. Our findings suggest that costs of robotic pancreatectomy may decrease further with increased surgeon experience.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":8030,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery","volume":"9 5","pages":"1066-1074"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ags3.70017","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of hospital costs for robotic and open pancreatectomy incurred during the implementation of a robotic pancreatectomy program at a cancer center\",\"authors\":\"Heather G. Lyu,&nbsp;Yuki Hirata,&nbsp;Pamela W. Lu,&nbsp;Jess E. Maxwell,&nbsp;Rebecca A. Snyder,&nbsp;Michael P. Kim,&nbsp;Hop Tran Cao,&nbsp;Ching-Wei D. Tzeng,&nbsp;Matthew H. G. Katz,&nbsp;Naruhiko Ikoma\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ags3.70017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Costs associated with robotic pancreatectomy compared to those of open pancreatectomy are assumed to be high but are not well known, particularly during the initial implementation of the robot.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Study Design</h3>\\n \\n <p>Patients who underwent pancreatectomy for any diagnosis from January 2017 to August 2021 were identified retrospectively. Total hospital cost was calculated using intraoperative, inpatient, and outpatient costs within 30 days of surgery. The ratio of the total cost of each pancreatectomy to the average cost of all operations at our center was used to represent cost without sharing proprietary financial data. Propensity score matching was performed to account for significant differences between the two groups.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>We identified 679 patients who underwent pancreatectomies, 88 of which were robotic. After propensity score matching, the open cohort had 176 patients, and the robotic cohort remained at 88 patients. The median hospital length of stay was 2 days shorter for robotic than for open pancreatectomy (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). The total hospital cost was markedly lower in the robotic pancreatectomy cohort. The inpatient and outpatient costs for robotic pancreatectomy were considerably lower than those for open pancreatectomy despite substantially higher intraoperative costs for the former procedure. A scatter plot of total costs after the initial adoption of the robot showed a trend of decreasing costs over time.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Overall, total hospital costs associated with robotic pancreatectomy were lower than those for open surgery, mainly driven by shorter length of stay. Our findings suggest that costs of robotic pancreatectomy may decrease further with increased surgeon experience.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8030,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery\",\"volume\":\"9 5\",\"pages\":\"1066-1074\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ags3.70017\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ags3.70017\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ags3.70017","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

与开放式胰腺切除术相比,机器人胰腺切除术的相关成本被认为是高的,但并不为人所知,特别是在机器人的初始实施阶段。研究设计回顾性分析2017年1月至2021年8月期间因任何诊断而行胰腺切除术的患者。总住院费用采用手术30天内的术中、住院和门诊费用计算。每次胰腺切除术的总成本与本中心所有手术的平均成本之比被用来表示成本,而不共享专有财务数据。进行倾向评分匹配以解释两组之间的显著差异。结果我们确定了679例接受胰腺切除术的患者,其中88例是机器人。倾向评分匹配后,开放队列有176名患者,机器人队列仍为88名患者。机器人胰腺切除术的住院时间中位数比开放式胰腺切除术短2天(p < 0.001)。在机器人胰腺切除术队列中,总住院费用明显较低。机器人胰腺切除术的住院和门诊费用明显低于开放式胰腺切除术,尽管前者的术中费用高得多。机器人初始使用后的总成本散点图显示了成本随时间降低的趋势。结论总体而言,机器人胰腺切除术的总住院费用低于开放手术,主要原因是住院时间较短。我们的研究结果表明,随着外科医生经验的增加,机器人胰腺切除术的成本可能会进一步降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Analysis of hospital costs for robotic and open pancreatectomy incurred during the implementation of a robotic pancreatectomy program at a cancer center

Analysis of hospital costs for robotic and open pancreatectomy incurred during the implementation of a robotic pancreatectomy program at a cancer center

Background

Costs associated with robotic pancreatectomy compared to those of open pancreatectomy are assumed to be high but are not well known, particularly during the initial implementation of the robot.

Study Design

Patients who underwent pancreatectomy for any diagnosis from January 2017 to August 2021 were identified retrospectively. Total hospital cost was calculated using intraoperative, inpatient, and outpatient costs within 30 days of surgery. The ratio of the total cost of each pancreatectomy to the average cost of all operations at our center was used to represent cost without sharing proprietary financial data. Propensity score matching was performed to account for significant differences between the two groups.

Results

We identified 679 patients who underwent pancreatectomies, 88 of which were robotic. After propensity score matching, the open cohort had 176 patients, and the robotic cohort remained at 88 patients. The median hospital length of stay was 2 days shorter for robotic than for open pancreatectomy (p < 0.001). The total hospital cost was markedly lower in the robotic pancreatectomy cohort. The inpatient and outpatient costs for robotic pancreatectomy were considerably lower than those for open pancreatectomy despite substantially higher intraoperative costs for the former procedure. A scatter plot of total costs after the initial adoption of the robot showed a trend of decreasing costs over time.

Conclusion

Overall, total hospital costs associated with robotic pancreatectomy were lower than those for open surgery, mainly driven by shorter length of stay. Our findings suggest that costs of robotic pancreatectomy may decrease further with increased surgeon experience.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery
Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
11.10%
发文量
98
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信