Lucas Correia Santana Amancio, Alexandre Reis Machado, Cristina Maria de Souza-Motta, Juan Manuel Tovar-Pedraza, Ailton Reis, Kamila Câmara Correia, Sami Jorge Michereff
{"title":"用特异性引物PCR检测茄根丝核菌吻合群缺乏特异性","authors":"Lucas Correia Santana Amancio, Alexandre Reis Machado, Cristina Maria de Souza-Motta, Juan Manuel Tovar-Pedraza, Ailton Reis, Kamila Câmara Correia, Sami Jorge Michereff","doi":"10.1111/jph.70162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Several specific primers based on the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region of rDNA have been used to discriminate anastomosis groups (AGs) and subgroups in <i>Rhizoctonia solani</i>, but the efficacy of these primers was not evaluated considering several known AGs. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of seven PCR-specific primers for the detection of four AGs and subgroups of <i>R. solani</i> (AG-1 IA, AG-1 IB, AG-2-1, AG-3 PT, AG-3 TB, AG-4 HGI, and AG-4 HGII). Thirteen isolates of <i>R. solani</i> and seven isolates of binucleate <i>Rhizoctonia</i> belonging to different AGs and subgroups were used in the detection assays and were amplified and sequenced using ITS1 and ITS4 universal primers to confirm the previous identification of AGs and the viability of the DNA samples. In addition, three isolates of unrelated fungal species (<i>Fusarium oxysporum, Macrophomina phaseolina,</i> and <i>Sclerotium rolfsii</i>) were tested simultaneously with each primer set above as a negative control. All primers tested nonspecifically amplified other AGs, and most of the primers produced bands for unrelated fungal species. Therefore, the exclusive use of these primers under the PCR conditions should be avoided due to the lack of accuracy in the results.</p>","PeriodicalId":16843,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Phytopathology","volume":"173 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jph.70162","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PCR With Specific Primers for Detection of Rhizoctonia solani Anastomosis Groups Reveals Lack of Specificity\",\"authors\":\"Lucas Correia Santana Amancio, Alexandre Reis Machado, Cristina Maria de Souza-Motta, Juan Manuel Tovar-Pedraza, Ailton Reis, Kamila Câmara Correia, Sami Jorge Michereff\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jph.70162\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Several specific primers based on the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region of rDNA have been used to discriminate anastomosis groups (AGs) and subgroups in <i>Rhizoctonia solani</i>, but the efficacy of these primers was not evaluated considering several known AGs. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of seven PCR-specific primers for the detection of four AGs and subgroups of <i>R. solani</i> (AG-1 IA, AG-1 IB, AG-2-1, AG-3 PT, AG-3 TB, AG-4 HGI, and AG-4 HGII). Thirteen isolates of <i>R. solani</i> and seven isolates of binucleate <i>Rhizoctonia</i> belonging to different AGs and subgroups were used in the detection assays and were amplified and sequenced using ITS1 and ITS4 universal primers to confirm the previous identification of AGs and the viability of the DNA samples. In addition, three isolates of unrelated fungal species (<i>Fusarium oxysporum, Macrophomina phaseolina,</i> and <i>Sclerotium rolfsii</i>) were tested simultaneously with each primer set above as a negative control. All primers tested nonspecifically amplified other AGs, and most of the primers produced bands for unrelated fungal species. Therefore, the exclusive use of these primers under the PCR conditions should be avoided due to the lack of accuracy in the results.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16843,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Phytopathology\",\"volume\":\"173 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jph.70162\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Phytopathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jph.70162\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PLANT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Phytopathology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jph.70162","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
PCR With Specific Primers for Detection of Rhizoctonia solani Anastomosis Groups Reveals Lack of Specificity
Several specific primers based on the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region of rDNA have been used to discriminate anastomosis groups (AGs) and subgroups in Rhizoctonia solani, but the efficacy of these primers was not evaluated considering several known AGs. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of seven PCR-specific primers for the detection of four AGs and subgroups of R. solani (AG-1 IA, AG-1 IB, AG-2-1, AG-3 PT, AG-3 TB, AG-4 HGI, and AG-4 HGII). Thirteen isolates of R. solani and seven isolates of binucleate Rhizoctonia belonging to different AGs and subgroups were used in the detection assays and were amplified and sequenced using ITS1 and ITS4 universal primers to confirm the previous identification of AGs and the viability of the DNA samples. In addition, three isolates of unrelated fungal species (Fusarium oxysporum, Macrophomina phaseolina, and Sclerotium rolfsii) were tested simultaneously with each primer set above as a negative control. All primers tested nonspecifically amplified other AGs, and most of the primers produced bands for unrelated fungal species. Therefore, the exclusive use of these primers under the PCR conditions should be avoided due to the lack of accuracy in the results.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Phytopathology publishes original and review articles on all scientific aspects of applied phytopathology in agricultural and horticultural crops. Preference is given to contributions improving our understanding of the biotic and abiotic determinants of plant diseases, including epidemics and damage potential, as a basis for innovative disease management, modelling and forecasting. This includes practical aspects and the development of methods for disease diagnosis as well as infection bioassays.
Studies at the population, organism, physiological, biochemical and molecular genetic level are welcome. The journal scope comprises the pathology and epidemiology of plant diseases caused by microbial pathogens, viruses and nematodes.
Accepted papers should advance our conceptual knowledge of plant diseases, rather than presenting descriptive or screening data unrelated to phytopathological mechanisms or functions. Results from unrepeated experimental conditions or data with no or inappropriate statistical processing will not be considered. Authors are encouraged to look at past issues to ensure adherence to the standards of the journal.