内隐社会等级刻板印象的群内群外效应

IF 1.6 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Yujiang Zhou, Shengjie Fang, Yuxue Chen, Zongjie Wu, Yuling Wang, Lin Zhang
{"title":"内隐社会等级刻板印象的群内群外效应","authors":"Yujiang Zhou,&nbsp;Shengjie Fang,&nbsp;Yuxue Chen,&nbsp;Zongjie Wu,&nbsp;Yuling Wang,&nbsp;Lin Zhang","doi":"10.1002/ijop.70106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Social hierarchy stereotypes play an important role in triggering intergroup prejudices. However, few researchers explored how people with different power and status perceive the differences in the social hierarchy stereotypes of ingroup and outgroup. We used the probe recognition paradigm to examine the ingroup–outgroup effect of implicit social hierarchy stereotypes on warmth and competence. The results showed that the high-power groups showed an implicit ingroup preference on competence but no warmth-based bias, whereas low-power groups showed an implicit outgroup preference on competence and an implicit ingroup preference on warmth; the high-status groups showed implicit ingroup preferences on both competence and warmth, and low-status groups showed an implicit outgroup preference on competence and an implicit ingroup preference on warmth. This suggests that power and status play different roles in predicting the implicit stereotypes of warmth and competence.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48146,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Psychology","volume":"60 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Ingroup–Outgroup Effect of Implicit Social Hierarchy Stereotypes\",\"authors\":\"Yujiang Zhou,&nbsp;Shengjie Fang,&nbsp;Yuxue Chen,&nbsp;Zongjie Wu,&nbsp;Yuling Wang,&nbsp;Lin Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ijop.70106\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Social hierarchy stereotypes play an important role in triggering intergroup prejudices. However, few researchers explored how people with different power and status perceive the differences in the social hierarchy stereotypes of ingroup and outgroup. We used the probe recognition paradigm to examine the ingroup–outgroup effect of implicit social hierarchy stereotypes on warmth and competence. The results showed that the high-power groups showed an implicit ingroup preference on competence but no warmth-based bias, whereas low-power groups showed an implicit outgroup preference on competence and an implicit ingroup preference on warmth; the high-status groups showed implicit ingroup preferences on both competence and warmth, and low-status groups showed an implicit outgroup preference on competence and an implicit ingroup preference on warmth. This suggests that power and status play different roles in predicting the implicit stereotypes of warmth and competence.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48146,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Psychology\",\"volume\":\"60 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ijop.70106\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ijop.70106","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

社会等级刻板印象在引发群体间偏见方面起着重要作用。然而,很少有研究探讨不同权力和地位的人如何感知内群体和外群体的社会等级刻板印象的差异。本研究采用探针认知范式考察了内隐社会等级刻板印象对温暖和能力的影响。结果表明:高权力群体对能力有内隐偏好,但不存在热情偏好;低权力群体对能力有内隐偏好,对热情有内隐偏好;社会地位高的群体对能力和热情表现出内隐偏好,社会地位低的群体对能力和热情表现出内隐偏好。这表明权力和地位在预测温暖和能力的内隐刻板印象方面发挥着不同的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Ingroup–Outgroup Effect of Implicit Social Hierarchy Stereotypes

Social hierarchy stereotypes play an important role in triggering intergroup prejudices. However, few researchers explored how people with different power and status perceive the differences in the social hierarchy stereotypes of ingroup and outgroup. We used the probe recognition paradigm to examine the ingroup–outgroup effect of implicit social hierarchy stereotypes on warmth and competence. The results showed that the high-power groups showed an implicit ingroup preference on competence but no warmth-based bias, whereas low-power groups showed an implicit outgroup preference on competence and an implicit ingroup preference on warmth; the high-status groups showed implicit ingroup preferences on both competence and warmth, and low-status groups showed an implicit outgroup preference on competence and an implicit ingroup preference on warmth. This suggests that power and status play different roles in predicting the implicit stereotypes of warmth and competence.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Psychology
International Journal of Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Psychology (IJP) is the journal of the International Union of Psychological Science (IUPsyS) and is published under the auspices of the Union. IJP seeks to support the IUPsyS in fostering the development of international psychological science. It aims to strengthen the dialog within psychology around the world and to facilitate communication among different areas of psychology and among psychologists from different cultural backgrounds. IJP is the outlet for empirical basic and applied studies and for reviews that either (a) incorporate perspectives from different areas or domains within psychology or across different disciplines, (b) test the culture-dependent validity of psychological theories, or (c) integrate literature from different regions in the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信