考虑技术集成能力和技术异质性的战略性新兴产业融合集群创新战略差异博弈分析

IF 2.7 3区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS
Siyu Chang, Bin Hu, Xianghao Yang
{"title":"考虑技术集成能力和技术异质性的战略性新兴产业融合集群创新战略差异博弈分析","authors":"Siyu Chang,&nbsp;Bin Hu,&nbsp;Xianghao Yang","doi":"10.1002/mde.4562","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Driven by strategic direction, strategic emerging industry convergence clusters are a complex evolutionary process of increasing technological innovation levels and optimizing industrial structure through cross-sectoral organizational collaboration and cooperation among various stakeholders. Given the dynamic and long-term nature of this process, alongside factors such as technological heterogeneity and integration capabilities, we use a differential game approach to compare the optimal innovation strategies across three scenarios: centralized decision-making, Stackelberg leader–follower, and Nash noncooperative game models. This analysis explores how different innovation entities within strategic emerging industry clusters can coordinate and cooperate to achieve converged cluster development. The results indicate that (1) innovation levels in convergence clusters and the returns of individual actors are lowest under the Nash noncooperative game model, followed by the Stackelberg leader–follower model. The optimal strategy for convergence cluster development is centralized decision-making and collaborative development. (2) While technological heterogeneity inhibits the benefits of innovation entities, technological integration capabilities increase them. Additionally, the growth of convergence clusters is more strongly impacted by technical heterogeneity, with higher levels of heterogeneity having a negative impact on their development. (3) Under centralized decision-making, government subsidies have the strongest incentive effect; nevertheless, as compared to other characteristics, their influence on increasing convergence cluster returns is weaker. Findings here may provide theoretical support for enhancing innovation efficiency and promoting strategic emerging industry convergence clusters.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":18186,"journal":{"name":"Managerial and Decision Economics","volume":"46 7","pages":"3914-3934"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differential Game Analysis of Strategic Emerging Industry Convergence Cluster Innovation Strategy Considering Technology Integration Capabilities and Technology Heterogeneity\",\"authors\":\"Siyu Chang,&nbsp;Bin Hu,&nbsp;Xianghao Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/mde.4562\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Driven by strategic direction, strategic emerging industry convergence clusters are a complex evolutionary process of increasing technological innovation levels and optimizing industrial structure through cross-sectoral organizational collaboration and cooperation among various stakeholders. Given the dynamic and long-term nature of this process, alongside factors such as technological heterogeneity and integration capabilities, we use a differential game approach to compare the optimal innovation strategies across three scenarios: centralized decision-making, Stackelberg leader–follower, and Nash noncooperative game models. This analysis explores how different innovation entities within strategic emerging industry clusters can coordinate and cooperate to achieve converged cluster development. The results indicate that (1) innovation levels in convergence clusters and the returns of individual actors are lowest under the Nash noncooperative game model, followed by the Stackelberg leader–follower model. The optimal strategy for convergence cluster development is centralized decision-making and collaborative development. (2) While technological heterogeneity inhibits the benefits of innovation entities, technological integration capabilities increase them. Additionally, the growth of convergence clusters is more strongly impacted by technical heterogeneity, with higher levels of heterogeneity having a negative impact on their development. (3) Under centralized decision-making, government subsidies have the strongest incentive effect; nevertheless, as compared to other characteristics, their influence on increasing convergence cluster returns is weaker. Findings here may provide theoretical support for enhancing innovation efficiency and promoting strategic emerging industry convergence clusters.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18186,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Managerial and Decision Economics\",\"volume\":\"46 7\",\"pages\":\"3914-3934\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Managerial and Decision Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mde.4562\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Managerial and Decision Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mde.4562","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

战略性新兴产业融合集群是在战略方向的驱动下,通过跨部门组织协作和各利益相关者之间的合作,不断提升技术创新水平、优化产业结构的复杂演化过程。考虑到这一过程的动态性和长期性,以及技术异质性和整合能力等因素,我们使用微分博弈方法比较了三种情况下的最优创新策略:集中决策、Stackelberg领导-追随者和纳什非合作博弈模型。本文探讨了战略性新兴产业集群中不同创新主体如何协调合作,实现集群融合发展。研究结果表明:(1)纳什非合作博弈模型下集群创新水平最低,个体行为者收益最低,其次是Stackelberg leader-follower模型;融合集群发展的最优策略是集中决策和协同发展。(2)技术异质性抑制了创新主体的效益,而技术整合能力提高了创新主体的效益。此外,技术异质性对集群发展的影响更为强烈,异质性水平越高,对集群发展的影响越小。(3)集中决策下,政府补贴的激励作用最强;然而,与其他特征相比,它们对增加收敛集群收益的影响较弱。研究结果可为提高创新效率、促进战略性新兴产业集聚提供理论支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Differential Game Analysis of Strategic Emerging Industry Convergence Cluster Innovation Strategy Considering Technology Integration Capabilities and Technology Heterogeneity

Driven by strategic direction, strategic emerging industry convergence clusters are a complex evolutionary process of increasing technological innovation levels and optimizing industrial structure through cross-sectoral organizational collaboration and cooperation among various stakeholders. Given the dynamic and long-term nature of this process, alongside factors such as technological heterogeneity and integration capabilities, we use a differential game approach to compare the optimal innovation strategies across three scenarios: centralized decision-making, Stackelberg leader–follower, and Nash noncooperative game models. This analysis explores how different innovation entities within strategic emerging industry clusters can coordinate and cooperate to achieve converged cluster development. The results indicate that (1) innovation levels in convergence clusters and the returns of individual actors are lowest under the Nash noncooperative game model, followed by the Stackelberg leader–follower model. The optimal strategy for convergence cluster development is centralized decision-making and collaborative development. (2) While technological heterogeneity inhibits the benefits of innovation entities, technological integration capabilities increase them. Additionally, the growth of convergence clusters is more strongly impacted by technical heterogeneity, with higher levels of heterogeneity having a negative impact on their development. (3) Under centralized decision-making, government subsidies have the strongest incentive effect; nevertheless, as compared to other characteristics, their influence on increasing convergence cluster returns is weaker. Findings here may provide theoretical support for enhancing innovation efficiency and promoting strategic emerging industry convergence clusters.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
18.20%
发文量
242
期刊介绍: Managerial and Decision Economics will publish articles applying economic reasoning to managerial decision-making and management strategy.Management strategy concerns practical decisions that managers face about how to compete, how to succeed, and how to organize to achieve their goals. Economic thinking and analysis provides a critical foundation for strategic decision-making across a variety of dimensions. For example, economic insights may help in determining which activities to outsource and which to perfom internally. They can help unravel questions regarding what drives performance differences among firms and what allows these differences to persist. They can contribute to an appreciation of how industries, organizations, and capabilities evolve.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信