原子力显微镜图像分析和纤维素纳米晶体粒度测量的半自动工作流程

IF 4.8 2区 工程技术 Q1 MATERIALS SCIENCE, PAPER & WOOD
Saba Karimi, Sezen Yucel, Robert J. Moon, Linda J. Johnston, Nathan J. Bechle, Warren Batchelor, Jae-Young Cho, Surya R. Kalidindi
{"title":"原子力显微镜图像分析和纤维素纳米晶体粒度测量的半自动工作流程","authors":"Saba Karimi,&nbsp;Sezen Yucel,&nbsp;Robert J. Moon,&nbsp;Linda J. Johnston,&nbsp;Nathan J. Bechle,&nbsp;Warren Batchelor,&nbsp;Jae-Young Cho,&nbsp;Surya R. Kalidindi","doi":"10.1007/s10570-025-06690-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The reliable measurement of cellulose nanocrystal (CNC) particle morphology is vital for ongoing CNC production optimization and application development. A semi-automatic image analysis program, SMART-AFM, was developed for CNC particle size measurements from atomic force microscopy (AFM) images and subsequently used to analyze the AFM images acquired from four laboratories that participated in the interlaboratory comparison (ILC) study by Bushell et al.<i>.</i> SMART-AFM demonstrated a 40 times faster analysis compared to the manual approach used in the ILC. A detailed image-to-image analysis showed that SMART-AFM produced similarly accurate results as compared to the manual method for CNC identification, as well as length and height measurements. SMART-AFM “correctly” identified CNCs 82–90% and manual analysis identified 83–94%, depending on the given laboratory image dataset. While SMART-AFM reported mean length values consistently 7–16.5% lower than the manual approach—attributed to trimming CNC tails during segmentation—CNC height measurements were in closer agreement—an average difference of 4.2%. Moreover, SMART-AFM CNC identification and measurement demonstrated lower variability across images from different laboratories, potentially indicating higher identification consistency compared to the subjective and qualitative nature of manual analysis. The strengths and challenges of SMART-AFM in analyzing images affected by AFM imaging artifacts is systematically studied. An analysis is presented to reaffirm the importance of measuring 300–500 CNCs to ensure a representative, reliable measurement results. Overall, SMART-AFM is established as a standardized CNC identification and measurement tool, with improved speed compared to the manual alternative, and proven consistency and reliability. The SMART-AFM code is publicly available in Github™.</p><h3>Graphical abstract</h3>\n<div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>","PeriodicalId":511,"journal":{"name":"Cellulose","volume":"32 13","pages":"7535 - 7552"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A semi-automatic workflow for atomic force microscopy image analysis and cellulose nanocrystal particle size measurements\",\"authors\":\"Saba Karimi,&nbsp;Sezen Yucel,&nbsp;Robert J. Moon,&nbsp;Linda J. Johnston,&nbsp;Nathan J. Bechle,&nbsp;Warren Batchelor,&nbsp;Jae-Young Cho,&nbsp;Surya R. Kalidindi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10570-025-06690-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The reliable measurement of cellulose nanocrystal (CNC) particle morphology is vital for ongoing CNC production optimization and application development. A semi-automatic image analysis program, SMART-AFM, was developed for CNC particle size measurements from atomic force microscopy (AFM) images and subsequently used to analyze the AFM images acquired from four laboratories that participated in the interlaboratory comparison (ILC) study by Bushell et al.<i>.</i> SMART-AFM demonstrated a 40 times faster analysis compared to the manual approach used in the ILC. A detailed image-to-image analysis showed that SMART-AFM produced similarly accurate results as compared to the manual method for CNC identification, as well as length and height measurements. SMART-AFM “correctly” identified CNCs 82–90% and manual analysis identified 83–94%, depending on the given laboratory image dataset. While SMART-AFM reported mean length values consistently 7–16.5% lower than the manual approach—attributed to trimming CNC tails during segmentation—CNC height measurements were in closer agreement—an average difference of 4.2%. Moreover, SMART-AFM CNC identification and measurement demonstrated lower variability across images from different laboratories, potentially indicating higher identification consistency compared to the subjective and qualitative nature of manual analysis. The strengths and challenges of SMART-AFM in analyzing images affected by AFM imaging artifacts is systematically studied. An analysis is presented to reaffirm the importance of measuring 300–500 CNCs to ensure a representative, reliable measurement results. Overall, SMART-AFM is established as a standardized CNC identification and measurement tool, with improved speed compared to the manual alternative, and proven consistency and reliability. The SMART-AFM code is publicly available in Github™.</p><h3>Graphical abstract</h3>\\n<div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":511,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cellulose\",\"volume\":\"32 13\",\"pages\":\"7535 - 7552\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cellulose\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10570-025-06690-w\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, PAPER & WOOD\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cellulose","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10570-025-06690-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, PAPER & WOOD","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

纤维素纳米晶(CNC)颗粒形态的可靠测量对于CNC生产优化和应用开发至关重要。半自动图像分析程序SMART-AFM用于原子力显微镜(AFM)图像的CNC粒度测量,随后用于分析来自四个实验室的AFM图像,这些实验室参与了Bushell等人的实验室间比较(ILC)研究。与ILC中使用的手动方法相比,SMART-AFM的分析速度快40倍。详细的图像对图像分析表明,与CNC识别以及长度和高度测量的手动方法相比,SMART-AFM产生了类似的准确结果。根据给定的实验室图像数据集,SMART-AFM“正确”识别出了cnc的82-90%,人工分析识别出了83-94%。虽然SMART-AFM报告的平均长度值始终比手动方法低7-16.5%,但CNC高度测量结果更接近一致,平均差异为4.2%。此外,SMART-AFM CNC识别和测量显示来自不同实验室的图像的变异性较低,与人工分析的主观和定性性质相比,可能表明更高的识别一致性。系统地研究了SMART-AFM在分析受AFM成像伪影影响的图像方面的优势和挑战。分析重申了测量300-500个cnc的重要性,以确保具有代表性,可靠的测量结果。总体而言,SMART-AFM是一种标准化的数控识别和测量工具,与手动替代方案相比,速度更快,并且具有经过验证的一致性和可靠性。SMART-AFM代码可以在Github™中公开获得。图形抽象
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A semi-automatic workflow for atomic force microscopy image analysis and cellulose nanocrystal particle size measurements

The reliable measurement of cellulose nanocrystal (CNC) particle morphology is vital for ongoing CNC production optimization and application development. A semi-automatic image analysis program, SMART-AFM, was developed for CNC particle size measurements from atomic force microscopy (AFM) images and subsequently used to analyze the AFM images acquired from four laboratories that participated in the interlaboratory comparison (ILC) study by Bushell et al.. SMART-AFM demonstrated a 40 times faster analysis compared to the manual approach used in the ILC. A detailed image-to-image analysis showed that SMART-AFM produced similarly accurate results as compared to the manual method for CNC identification, as well as length and height measurements. SMART-AFM “correctly” identified CNCs 82–90% and manual analysis identified 83–94%, depending on the given laboratory image dataset. While SMART-AFM reported mean length values consistently 7–16.5% lower than the manual approach—attributed to trimming CNC tails during segmentation—CNC height measurements were in closer agreement—an average difference of 4.2%. Moreover, SMART-AFM CNC identification and measurement demonstrated lower variability across images from different laboratories, potentially indicating higher identification consistency compared to the subjective and qualitative nature of manual analysis. The strengths and challenges of SMART-AFM in analyzing images affected by AFM imaging artifacts is systematically studied. An analysis is presented to reaffirm the importance of measuring 300–500 CNCs to ensure a representative, reliable measurement results. Overall, SMART-AFM is established as a standardized CNC identification and measurement tool, with improved speed compared to the manual alternative, and proven consistency and reliability. The SMART-AFM code is publicly available in Github™.

Graphical abstract

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cellulose
Cellulose 工程技术-材料科学:纺织
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
10.50%
发文量
580
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Cellulose is an international journal devoted to the dissemination of research and scientific and technological progress in the field of cellulose and related naturally occurring polymers. The journal is concerned with the pure and applied science of cellulose and related materials, and also with the development of relevant new technologies. This includes the chemistry, biochemistry, physics and materials science of cellulose and its sources, including wood and other biomass resources, and their derivatives. Coverage extends to the conversion of these polymers and resources into manufactured goods, such as pulp, paper, textiles, and manufactured as well natural fibers, and to the chemistry of materials used in their processing. Cellulose publishes review articles, research papers, and technical notes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信