厚CFRP, GFRP和BFRP复合材料层合板在Charpy冲击下的有限元模拟

IF 2.3 4区 工程技术 Q1 MATERIALS SCIENCE, TEXTILES
Dongdong Chen, Maozhou Meng, Tim Searle, Shoune Xiao
{"title":"厚CFRP, GFRP和BFRP复合材料层合板在Charpy冲击下的有限元模拟","authors":"Dongdong Chen,&nbsp;Maozhou Meng,&nbsp;Tim Searle,&nbsp;Shoune Xiao","doi":"10.1007/s12221-025-01109-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study explores the impact responses of thick laminated composites, including carbon fibre reinforced plastics (CFRP), glass fibre reinforced plastics (GFRP), and basalt fibre reinforced plastics (BFRP). Three layups were prepared using the resin infusion method: unidirectional (UD), cross-ply (CP), and angle-ply (AP). These were tested using the Charpy impact test taking the ASTM-E23 as reference. A two-scale finite-element (FE) model was developed to bridge the computational relationship between micro-scale characteristics (mechanical properties of fibre and matrix, fibre volume fraction, and layup) and macro-scale impact resistance. Results showed that the impact strength of composite laminates decreased in the order of UD, CP, and AP, while GFRP and BFRP laminates exhibited an approximately 42.2–78.3% and 90.7–187.7% increase in impact strength compared to CFRP. Reasons can be owed to the stiffness mismatch between adjacent composite plies, which contributed to the tensile and compressive energy absorption mechanisms in CP layups. Different materials and layups demonstrated distinct failure mechanisms, attributable to the better ductility of glass and basalt fibres. The conclusions of this study aim to deepen the understanding of damage and energy absorption mechanisms in thick composite laminates, thereby providing practical guidelines for structural design.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":557,"journal":{"name":"Fibers and Polymers","volume":"26 10","pages":"4559 - 4577"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"FEA Modelling of Thick CFRP, GFRP, and BFRP Composite Laminates Under Charpy Impact\",\"authors\":\"Dongdong Chen,&nbsp;Maozhou Meng,&nbsp;Tim Searle,&nbsp;Shoune Xiao\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12221-025-01109-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study explores the impact responses of thick laminated composites, including carbon fibre reinforced plastics (CFRP), glass fibre reinforced plastics (GFRP), and basalt fibre reinforced plastics (BFRP). Three layups were prepared using the resin infusion method: unidirectional (UD), cross-ply (CP), and angle-ply (AP). These were tested using the Charpy impact test taking the ASTM-E23 as reference. A two-scale finite-element (FE) model was developed to bridge the computational relationship between micro-scale characteristics (mechanical properties of fibre and matrix, fibre volume fraction, and layup) and macro-scale impact resistance. Results showed that the impact strength of composite laminates decreased in the order of UD, CP, and AP, while GFRP and BFRP laminates exhibited an approximately 42.2–78.3% and 90.7–187.7% increase in impact strength compared to CFRP. Reasons can be owed to the stiffness mismatch between adjacent composite plies, which contributed to the tensile and compressive energy absorption mechanisms in CP layups. Different materials and layups demonstrated distinct failure mechanisms, attributable to the better ductility of glass and basalt fibres. The conclusions of this study aim to deepen the understanding of damage and energy absorption mechanisms in thick composite laminates, thereby providing practical guidelines for structural design.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":557,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fibers and Polymers\",\"volume\":\"26 10\",\"pages\":\"4559 - 4577\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fibers and Polymers\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12221-025-01109-6\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, TEXTILES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fibers and Polymers","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12221-025-01109-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, TEXTILES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了碳纤维增强塑料(CFRP)、玻璃纤维增强塑料(GFRP)和玄武岩纤维增强塑料(BFRP)等厚层复合材料的冲击响应。采用树脂灌注法制备了三种铺层:单向铺层(UD)、交叉铺层(CP)和角铺层(AP)。这些测试使用夏比冲击试验,以ASTM-E23为参考。建立了一种双尺度有限元(FE)模型,以架起微观尺度特征(纤维和基体的力学性能、纤维体积分数和铺层)与宏观尺度抗冲击性能之间的计算关系。结果表明:复合材料层合板的冲击强度依次为UD、CP、AP,而GFRP和BFRP层合板的冲击强度分别比CFRP提高了约42.2 ~ 78.3%和90.7 ~ 187.7%。原因可能是相邻复合材料层之间的刚度不匹配,这导致了CP层的拉伸和压缩能量吸收机制。由于玻璃纤维和玄武岩纤维的延展性更好,不同的材料和铺层表现出不同的破坏机制。本研究的结论旨在加深对厚复合材料层合板损伤和能量吸收机制的理解,从而为结构设计提供实用指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
FEA Modelling of Thick CFRP, GFRP, and BFRP Composite Laminates Under Charpy Impact

This study explores the impact responses of thick laminated composites, including carbon fibre reinforced plastics (CFRP), glass fibre reinforced plastics (GFRP), and basalt fibre reinforced plastics (BFRP). Three layups were prepared using the resin infusion method: unidirectional (UD), cross-ply (CP), and angle-ply (AP). These were tested using the Charpy impact test taking the ASTM-E23 as reference. A two-scale finite-element (FE) model was developed to bridge the computational relationship between micro-scale characteristics (mechanical properties of fibre and matrix, fibre volume fraction, and layup) and macro-scale impact resistance. Results showed that the impact strength of composite laminates decreased in the order of UD, CP, and AP, while GFRP and BFRP laminates exhibited an approximately 42.2–78.3% and 90.7–187.7% increase in impact strength compared to CFRP. Reasons can be owed to the stiffness mismatch between adjacent composite plies, which contributed to the tensile and compressive energy absorption mechanisms in CP layups. Different materials and layups demonstrated distinct failure mechanisms, attributable to the better ductility of glass and basalt fibres. The conclusions of this study aim to deepen the understanding of damage and energy absorption mechanisms in thick composite laminates, thereby providing practical guidelines for structural design.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Fibers and Polymers
Fibers and Polymers 工程技术-材料科学:纺织
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
8.00%
发文量
267
审稿时长
3.9 months
期刊介绍: -Chemistry of Fiber Materials, Polymer Reactions and Synthesis- Physical Properties of Fibers, Polymer Blends and Composites- Fiber Spinning and Textile Processing, Polymer Physics, Morphology- Colorants and Dyeing, Polymer Analysis and Characterization- Chemical Aftertreatment of Textiles, Polymer Processing and Rheology- Textile and Apparel Science, Functional Polymers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信