竹木复合材料与云杉松木交叉层压板防火性能比较

IF 4.8 2区 工程技术 Q1 MATERIALS SCIENCE, PAPER & WOOD
Benhuan Xu, Qingping Chen, Rongzhuo Zhang, Zheng Wang
{"title":"竹木复合材料与云杉松木交叉层压板防火性能比较","authors":"Benhuan Xu,&nbsp;Qingping Chen,&nbsp;Rongzhuo Zhang,&nbsp;Zheng Wang","doi":"10.1007/s10570-025-06692-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The increasing demand for energy-efficient and sustainable building materials has driven the growth of cross-laminated timber (CLT) in heavy timber construction. However, the flammability of wood remains a key challenge. This study compares the combustion characteristics of laminated bamboo lumber (LBL) and spruce–pine–fir (SPF) in bamboo–wood composite (BWC) CLT panels. Using a cone calorimeter, the combustion parameters of both materials were measured, and the effects of heat flux were analyzed. Fire furnace experiments were also conducted to evaluate the charring rate, fire performance, and structural integrity of the panels under standard fire conditions. Results show that LBL exhibits superior fire performance compared to SPF upon ignition, but its peak heat release rate during secondary combustion is more intense, indicating a higher thermal hazard. However, LBL maintains its structural integrity longer after combustion and produces lower emissions of CO and CO<sub>2</sub>, reducing health risks. The charring rate of BWC CLT is higher than that of SPF, but it meets fire resistance limits exceeding 1.5 h. This performance, coupled with the unique fiber arrangement of bamboo and slow combustion rate, highlights its potential in enhancing fire safety. The findings contribute to the optimization of CLT design for improved fire performance, supporting sustainable development in fire-resistant timber construction.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":511,"journal":{"name":"Cellulose","volume":"32 13","pages":"7911 - 7928"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fire performance comparison of bamboo-wood composite and spruce-pine-fir cross-laminated timber panels\",\"authors\":\"Benhuan Xu,&nbsp;Qingping Chen,&nbsp;Rongzhuo Zhang,&nbsp;Zheng Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10570-025-06692-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The increasing demand for energy-efficient and sustainable building materials has driven the growth of cross-laminated timber (CLT) in heavy timber construction. However, the flammability of wood remains a key challenge. This study compares the combustion characteristics of laminated bamboo lumber (LBL) and spruce–pine–fir (SPF) in bamboo–wood composite (BWC) CLT panels. Using a cone calorimeter, the combustion parameters of both materials were measured, and the effects of heat flux were analyzed. Fire furnace experiments were also conducted to evaluate the charring rate, fire performance, and structural integrity of the panels under standard fire conditions. Results show that LBL exhibits superior fire performance compared to SPF upon ignition, but its peak heat release rate during secondary combustion is more intense, indicating a higher thermal hazard. However, LBL maintains its structural integrity longer after combustion and produces lower emissions of CO and CO<sub>2</sub>, reducing health risks. The charring rate of BWC CLT is higher than that of SPF, but it meets fire resistance limits exceeding 1.5 h. This performance, coupled with the unique fiber arrangement of bamboo and slow combustion rate, highlights its potential in enhancing fire safety. The findings contribute to the optimization of CLT design for improved fire performance, supporting sustainable development in fire-resistant timber construction.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":511,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cellulose\",\"volume\":\"32 13\",\"pages\":\"7911 - 7928\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cellulose\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10570-025-06692-8\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, PAPER & WOOD\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cellulose","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10570-025-06692-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, PAPER & WOOD","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对节能和可持续建筑材料日益增长的需求推动了重型木结构中交叉层压木材(CLT)的增长。然而,木材的可燃性仍然是一个关键的挑战。本研究比较了竹木复合材料(BWC) CLT板中层压竹材(LBL)和云杉杉木(SPF)的燃烧特性。利用锥形量热仪测量了两种材料的燃烧参数,并分析了热流密度的影响。还进行了火炉实验,以评估在标准火灾条件下面板的炭化率,防火性能和结构完整性。结果表明,与SPF相比,LBL在着火时表现出更好的防火性能,但其二次燃烧时的峰值放热率更强,表明其具有更高的热危险性。然而,LBL在燃烧后保持其结构完整性的时间更长,产生的CO和CO2排放量更低,降低了健康风险。BWC CLT的炭化率高于SPF,但其耐火极限超过1.5 h。这一性能,再加上竹子独特的纤维排列方式和缓慢的燃烧速度,凸显了其增强消防安全的潜力。研究结果有助于优化CLT设计以提高防火性能,支持防火木结构的可持续发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Fire performance comparison of bamboo-wood composite and spruce-pine-fir cross-laminated timber panels

Fire performance comparison of bamboo-wood composite and spruce-pine-fir cross-laminated timber panels

Fire performance comparison of bamboo-wood composite and spruce-pine-fir cross-laminated timber panels

The increasing demand for energy-efficient and sustainable building materials has driven the growth of cross-laminated timber (CLT) in heavy timber construction. However, the flammability of wood remains a key challenge. This study compares the combustion characteristics of laminated bamboo lumber (LBL) and spruce–pine–fir (SPF) in bamboo–wood composite (BWC) CLT panels. Using a cone calorimeter, the combustion parameters of both materials were measured, and the effects of heat flux were analyzed. Fire furnace experiments were also conducted to evaluate the charring rate, fire performance, and structural integrity of the panels under standard fire conditions. Results show that LBL exhibits superior fire performance compared to SPF upon ignition, but its peak heat release rate during secondary combustion is more intense, indicating a higher thermal hazard. However, LBL maintains its structural integrity longer after combustion and produces lower emissions of CO and CO2, reducing health risks. The charring rate of BWC CLT is higher than that of SPF, but it meets fire resistance limits exceeding 1.5 h. This performance, coupled with the unique fiber arrangement of bamboo and slow combustion rate, highlights its potential in enhancing fire safety. The findings contribute to the optimization of CLT design for improved fire performance, supporting sustainable development in fire-resistant timber construction.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cellulose
Cellulose 工程技术-材料科学:纺织
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
10.50%
发文量
580
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Cellulose is an international journal devoted to the dissemination of research and scientific and technological progress in the field of cellulose and related naturally occurring polymers. The journal is concerned with the pure and applied science of cellulose and related materials, and also with the development of relevant new technologies. This includes the chemistry, biochemistry, physics and materials science of cellulose and its sources, including wood and other biomass resources, and their derivatives. Coverage extends to the conversion of these polymers and resources into manufactured goods, such as pulp, paper, textiles, and manufactured as well natural fibers, and to the chemistry of materials used in their processing. Cellulose publishes review articles, research papers, and technical notes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信