评估物理和职业治疗师和助理实施基于电子健康记录的干预以支持围手术期患者使用非药物疼痛管理技术的经验

IF 2 Q2 REHABILITATION
Jane T. Hein PT , Sarah Redmond PhD , Lina Daus DPT , Monica Heinemann MOT , Jon Tilburt MD , Andrea Cheville MD, MSCE
{"title":"评估物理和职业治疗师和助理实施基于电子健康记录的干预以支持围手术期患者使用非药物疼痛管理技术的经验","authors":"Jane T. Hein PT ,&nbsp;Sarah Redmond PhD ,&nbsp;Lina Daus DPT ,&nbsp;Monica Heinemann MOT ,&nbsp;Jon Tilburt MD ,&nbsp;Andrea Cheville MD, MSCE","doi":"10.1016/j.arrct.2025.100462","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To explore barriers and facilitators experienced by therapists (physical therapists/assistants and occupational therapists/assistants) supporting the implementation of the electronic health record (EHR)-based Healing After Surgery (HAS) initiative, which used clinical decision support (CDS) elements to support therapists in providing perioperative education and support to patients for the use of evidence-based nonpharmacological pain care (NPPC) techniques as part of a health system-wide clinical trial.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A cross-sectional web-based survey.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>Three academic and 3 community-based hospitals from the same health system.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>Therapists (N=236) who delivered the EHR-based HAS initiative.</div></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><div>Not applicable.</div></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><div>Barriers and facilitators that therapists experienced implementing the EHR-based HAS initiative.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We received survey responses from therapists (34.6% response rate). Using a numerical rating scale (1=not at all, 10=a great deal), therapists reported the highest agreement to questions regarding understanding the goal of the initiative (mean ± SD, 7.3±2.4) and alignment of the initiative with therapy practice (mean ± SD, 7.2±2.4), followed by alignment with patient needs (mean ± SD, 6.7±2.4). Ratings were slightly lower for understanding of their role (mean ± SD, 6.5±2.3), leadership support (mean ± SD, 6.3±2.4), and adequacy of training (mean ± SD, 6.2±2.4). Therapists rated the helpfulness of CDS elements at the midpoint of the scale, with mean ratings ranging from 5.0 to 5.1. Only 27% of therapists felt equipped to educate patients on all NPPC techniques.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The EHR-based HAS initiative was perceived to align with standard therapy care. However, many therapists did not feel equipped to support all NPPC techniques. Similar future efforts should address additional training needs and CDS refinement.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72291,"journal":{"name":"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation","volume":"7 3","pages":"Article 100462"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating Physical and Occupational Therapists’ and Assistants’ Experiences Implementing an Electronic Health Record-Based Intervention to Support Perioperative Patients’ Use of Nonpharmacological Pain Management Techniques\",\"authors\":\"Jane T. Hein PT ,&nbsp;Sarah Redmond PhD ,&nbsp;Lina Daus DPT ,&nbsp;Monica Heinemann MOT ,&nbsp;Jon Tilburt MD ,&nbsp;Andrea Cheville MD, MSCE\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.arrct.2025.100462\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To explore barriers and facilitators experienced by therapists (physical therapists/assistants and occupational therapists/assistants) supporting the implementation of the electronic health record (EHR)-based Healing After Surgery (HAS) initiative, which used clinical decision support (CDS) elements to support therapists in providing perioperative education and support to patients for the use of evidence-based nonpharmacological pain care (NPPC) techniques as part of a health system-wide clinical trial.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A cross-sectional web-based survey.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>Three academic and 3 community-based hospitals from the same health system.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>Therapists (N=236) who delivered the EHR-based HAS initiative.</div></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><div>Not applicable.</div></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><div>Barriers and facilitators that therapists experienced implementing the EHR-based HAS initiative.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We received survey responses from therapists (34.6% response rate). Using a numerical rating scale (1=not at all, 10=a great deal), therapists reported the highest agreement to questions regarding understanding the goal of the initiative (mean ± SD, 7.3±2.4) and alignment of the initiative with therapy practice (mean ± SD, 7.2±2.4), followed by alignment with patient needs (mean ± SD, 6.7±2.4). Ratings were slightly lower for understanding of their role (mean ± SD, 6.5±2.3), leadership support (mean ± SD, 6.3±2.4), and adequacy of training (mean ± SD, 6.2±2.4). Therapists rated the helpfulness of CDS elements at the midpoint of the scale, with mean ratings ranging from 5.0 to 5.1. Only 27% of therapists felt equipped to educate patients on all NPPC techniques.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The EHR-based HAS initiative was perceived to align with standard therapy care. However, many therapists did not feel equipped to support all NPPC techniques. Similar future efforts should address additional training needs and CDS refinement.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72291,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation\",\"volume\":\"7 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 100462\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590109525000370\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590109525000370","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的探讨治疗师(物理治疗师/助理和职业治疗师/助理)在实施基于电子健康记录(EHR)的术后康复(HAS)计划时遇到的障碍和促进因素。它使用临床决策支持(CDS)元素来支持治疗师提供围手术期教育,并支持患者使用循证非药物疼痛护理(NPPC)技术,作为卫生系统范围临床试验的一部分。设计一个基于网络的横断面调查。来自同一卫生系统的三家学术医院和三家社区医院。参与者:提供基于电子病历的HAS倡议的治疗师(N=236)。InterventionsNot适用。主要结果测量:治疗师在实施基于电子病历的HAS计划时遇到的障碍和促进因素。结果收到临床治疗师的调查反馈,有效率为34.6%。使用数字评定量表(1=完全不了解,10=非常了解),治疗师报告了关于理解主动性目标(平均±SD, 7.3±2.4)和主动性与治疗实践的一致性(平均±SD, 7.2±2.4)的问题的最高一致性,其次是与患者需求的一致性(平均±SD, 6.7±2.4)。对其角色的理解(平均±SD, 6.5±2.3)、领导支持(平均±SD, 6.3±2.4)和培训充分性(平均±SD, 6.2±2.4)的评分略低。治疗师在量表的中点对CDS元素的有用性进行评分,平均评分范围从5.0到5.1。只有27%的治疗师认为自己有能力教育患者所有的NPPC技术。结论基于ehr的HAS倡议被认为与标准治疗护理相一致。然而,许多治疗师并不认为自己有能力支持所有的NPPC技术。类似的未来努力应解决额外的培训需求和改进CDS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating Physical and Occupational Therapists’ and Assistants’ Experiences Implementing an Electronic Health Record-Based Intervention to Support Perioperative Patients’ Use of Nonpharmacological Pain Management Techniques

Objective

To explore barriers and facilitators experienced by therapists (physical therapists/assistants and occupational therapists/assistants) supporting the implementation of the electronic health record (EHR)-based Healing After Surgery (HAS) initiative, which used clinical decision support (CDS) elements to support therapists in providing perioperative education and support to patients for the use of evidence-based nonpharmacological pain care (NPPC) techniques as part of a health system-wide clinical trial.

Design

A cross-sectional web-based survey.

Setting

Three academic and 3 community-based hospitals from the same health system.

Participants

Therapists (N=236) who delivered the EHR-based HAS initiative.

Interventions

Not applicable.

Main Outcome Measures

Barriers and facilitators that therapists experienced implementing the EHR-based HAS initiative.

Results

We received survey responses from therapists (34.6% response rate). Using a numerical rating scale (1=not at all, 10=a great deal), therapists reported the highest agreement to questions regarding understanding the goal of the initiative (mean ± SD, 7.3±2.4) and alignment of the initiative with therapy practice (mean ± SD, 7.2±2.4), followed by alignment with patient needs (mean ± SD, 6.7±2.4). Ratings were slightly lower for understanding of their role (mean ± SD, 6.5±2.3), leadership support (mean ± SD, 6.3±2.4), and adequacy of training (mean ± SD, 6.2±2.4). Therapists rated the helpfulness of CDS elements at the midpoint of the scale, with mean ratings ranging from 5.0 to 5.1. Only 27% of therapists felt equipped to educate patients on all NPPC techniques.

Conclusions

The EHR-based HAS initiative was perceived to align with standard therapy care. However, many therapists did not feel equipped to support all NPPC techniques. Similar future efforts should address additional training needs and CDS refinement.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信