中重度颅脑外伤预后预测:创伤后精神错乱持续时间的实用评估价值

IF 2 Q2 REHABILITATION
Rabea Iris Pantelatos MD, PhD , Toril Skandsen MD, PhD , Turid Follestad PhD , Oddrun Sandrød , Camilla Sæterstad MD , Cathrine Elisabeth Einarsen MD, PhD , Kent Gøran Moen MD, PhD , Anne Vik MD, PhD , Jonas Stenberg PhD
{"title":"中重度颅脑外伤预后预测:创伤后精神错乱持续时间的实用评估价值","authors":"Rabea Iris Pantelatos MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Toril Skandsen MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Turid Follestad PhD ,&nbsp;Oddrun Sandrød ,&nbsp;Camilla Sæterstad MD ,&nbsp;Cathrine Elisabeth Einarsen MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Kent Gøran Moen MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Anne Vik MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Jonas Stenberg PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.arrct.2025.100446","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To explore the added value of posttraumatic confusional state (PTCS) duration for outcome prediction, in patients with moderate and severe traumatic brain injury (TBI).</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Neurosurgical inception cohort study with follow-up 12 months postinjury.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>Regional trauma center.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>Patients aged ≥16 years admitted with moderate or severe TBI (Glasgow Coma Scale score 9-13 and 3-8), who survived the acute phase. Three hundred ninety-five patients completed follow-up and had a valid PTCS duration estimation; 75% were men.</div></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><div>Not applicable.</div></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><div>PTCS duration was pragmatically categorized into weekly intervals, primarily through retrospective review of medical records. In addition to PTCS duration, predictors included age, sex, the admission Glasgow Coma Scale score, pupillary dilatation, and the worst Rotterdam computed tomography score. The outcome was assessed using the Glasgow Outcome Scale–Extended (GOSE). Uni- and multivariable binary logistic regression analyses were performed to explore predictive models with and without PTCS duration. The dependent variable GOSE was dichotomized using several cutoffs: GOSE scores ≤7, ≤6, ≤5, and ≤4.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The GOSE score (with lower scores indicating worse function) decreased with longer PTCS duration in patients with moderate and severe TBI. PTCS duration was a significant predictor of most outcomes and the only significant predictor in the multivariable models for severe TBI. Adding PTCS duration as a covariate improved the fit of the multivariable models, particularly in severe TBI. When PTCS lasted &lt;28 days, a GOSE score of 1-4 was observed in only 3% of cases.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The strong association between PTCS duration and outcomes demonstrates the benefit of estimating PTCS in hospital and rehabilitation settings. Moreover, PTCS holds promise as a modifier of the TBI severity classification.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72291,"journal":{"name":"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation","volume":"7 3","pages":"Article 100446"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prediction of Outcome in Moderate and Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: The Value of Pragmatic Estimation of the Duration of Posttraumatic Confusional State\",\"authors\":\"Rabea Iris Pantelatos MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Toril Skandsen MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Turid Follestad PhD ,&nbsp;Oddrun Sandrød ,&nbsp;Camilla Sæterstad MD ,&nbsp;Cathrine Elisabeth Einarsen MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Kent Gøran Moen MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Anne Vik MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Jonas Stenberg PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.arrct.2025.100446\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To explore the added value of posttraumatic confusional state (PTCS) duration for outcome prediction, in patients with moderate and severe traumatic brain injury (TBI).</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Neurosurgical inception cohort study with follow-up 12 months postinjury.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>Regional trauma center.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>Patients aged ≥16 years admitted with moderate or severe TBI (Glasgow Coma Scale score 9-13 and 3-8), who survived the acute phase. Three hundred ninety-five patients completed follow-up and had a valid PTCS duration estimation; 75% were men.</div></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><div>Not applicable.</div></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><div>PTCS duration was pragmatically categorized into weekly intervals, primarily through retrospective review of medical records. In addition to PTCS duration, predictors included age, sex, the admission Glasgow Coma Scale score, pupillary dilatation, and the worst Rotterdam computed tomography score. The outcome was assessed using the Glasgow Outcome Scale–Extended (GOSE). Uni- and multivariable binary logistic regression analyses were performed to explore predictive models with and without PTCS duration. The dependent variable GOSE was dichotomized using several cutoffs: GOSE scores ≤7, ≤6, ≤5, and ≤4.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The GOSE score (with lower scores indicating worse function) decreased with longer PTCS duration in patients with moderate and severe TBI. PTCS duration was a significant predictor of most outcomes and the only significant predictor in the multivariable models for severe TBI. Adding PTCS duration as a covariate improved the fit of the multivariable models, particularly in severe TBI. When PTCS lasted &lt;28 days, a GOSE score of 1-4 was observed in only 3% of cases.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The strong association between PTCS duration and outcomes demonstrates the benefit of estimating PTCS in hospital and rehabilitation settings. Moreover, PTCS holds promise as a modifier of the TBI severity classification.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72291,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation\",\"volume\":\"7 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 100446\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590109525000217\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590109525000217","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的探讨创伤后精神错乱(PTCS)持续时间对中重度颅脑损伤(TBI)患者预后预测的附加价值。设计神经外科初始队列研究,损伤后随访12个月。区域创伤中心。受试者年龄≥16岁,入院时患有中度或重度TBI(格拉斯哥昏迷评分9-13分和3-8分),急性期存活。395名患者完成了随访,并有有效的PTCS持续时间估计;75%是男性。InterventionsNot适用。主要观察结果:主要通过对医疗记录的回顾性回顾,将tcs持续时间按周间隔进行实用分类。除了PTCS持续时间外,预测因素还包括年龄、性别、入院时格拉斯哥昏迷评分、瞳孔扩张和最差鹿特丹计算机断层扫描评分。使用格拉斯哥结果扩展量表(GOSE)评估结果。采用单变量和多变量二元逻辑回归分析来探索有和没有PTCS持续时间的预测模型。因变量GOSE使用几个截止值进行二分类:GOSE评分≤7,≤6,≤5和≤4。结果中重度TBI患者的GOSE评分随PTCS持续时间的延长而降低(分数越低表明功能越差)。PTCS持续时间是大多数结果的重要预测因子,也是严重TBI多变量模型中唯一重要的预测因子。将PTCS持续时间作为协变量增加了多变量模型的拟合,特别是在严重的TBI中。当PTCS持续28天时,只有3%的病例观察到GOSE评分为1-4。结论PTCS持续时间与预后之间存在强相关性,表明在医院和康复环境中评估PTCS是有益的。此外,PTCS有望作为TBI严重程度分类的修饰符。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prediction of Outcome in Moderate and Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: The Value of Pragmatic Estimation of the Duration of Posttraumatic Confusional State

Objective

To explore the added value of posttraumatic confusional state (PTCS) duration for outcome prediction, in patients with moderate and severe traumatic brain injury (TBI).

Design

Neurosurgical inception cohort study with follow-up 12 months postinjury.

Setting

Regional trauma center.

Participants

Patients aged ≥16 years admitted with moderate or severe TBI (Glasgow Coma Scale score 9-13 and 3-8), who survived the acute phase. Three hundred ninety-five patients completed follow-up and had a valid PTCS duration estimation; 75% were men.

Interventions

Not applicable.

Main Outcome Measures

PTCS duration was pragmatically categorized into weekly intervals, primarily through retrospective review of medical records. In addition to PTCS duration, predictors included age, sex, the admission Glasgow Coma Scale score, pupillary dilatation, and the worst Rotterdam computed tomography score. The outcome was assessed using the Glasgow Outcome Scale–Extended (GOSE). Uni- and multivariable binary logistic regression analyses were performed to explore predictive models with and without PTCS duration. The dependent variable GOSE was dichotomized using several cutoffs: GOSE scores ≤7, ≤6, ≤5, and ≤4.

Results

The GOSE score (with lower scores indicating worse function) decreased with longer PTCS duration in patients with moderate and severe TBI. PTCS duration was a significant predictor of most outcomes and the only significant predictor in the multivariable models for severe TBI. Adding PTCS duration as a covariate improved the fit of the multivariable models, particularly in severe TBI. When PTCS lasted <28 days, a GOSE score of 1-4 was observed in only 3% of cases.

Conclusions

The strong association between PTCS duration and outcomes demonstrates the benefit of estimating PTCS in hospital and rehabilitation settings. Moreover, PTCS holds promise as a modifier of the TBI severity classification.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信