在“对不起”之外:调查道歉类型和语言风格对服务恢复中顾客原谅的影响

IF 9.8 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Zhenxian Piao , Ngoc Tran Nguyen , Hyoung Ju Song , Jeong-Yeol Park
{"title":"在“对不起”之外:调查道歉类型和语言风格对服务恢复中顾客原谅的影响","authors":"Zhenxian Piao ,&nbsp;Ngoc Tran Nguyen ,&nbsp;Hyoung Ju Song ,&nbsp;Jeong-Yeol Park","doi":"10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115679","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Research on the effects of different apology types in service recovery is crucial yet underexplored. Drawing upon costly signaling theory and language expectancy theory, this study employs an experimental approach to examine the effectiveness of apology types (responsibility-oriented vs. sympathy-oriented) and the moderating role of language styles (literal vs. figurative) in influencing customer forgiveness. The findings reveal that responsibility-oriented apologies are more effective in fostering decisional forgiveness, with figurative language enhancing emotional forgiveness in this context. Furthermore, the study identifies a serial mediation where perceived sincerity fosters emotional forgiveness, leading to decisional forgiveness. This study extends the existing literature by systematically exploring how different apology strategies impact forgiveness in customer service settings and highlights the importance of training employees in the use of apologies and language styles. This study also emphasizes the importance of internal marketing efforts aimed at training employees’ capabilities in identifying and handling complaints.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Research","volume":"201 ","pages":"Article 115679"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond “I am sorry”: Investigating the impacts of apology type and language style on customer forgiveness in service recovery\",\"authors\":\"Zhenxian Piao ,&nbsp;Ngoc Tran Nguyen ,&nbsp;Hyoung Ju Song ,&nbsp;Jeong-Yeol Park\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115679\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Research on the effects of different apology types in service recovery is crucial yet underexplored. Drawing upon costly signaling theory and language expectancy theory, this study employs an experimental approach to examine the effectiveness of apology types (responsibility-oriented vs. sympathy-oriented) and the moderating role of language styles (literal vs. figurative) in influencing customer forgiveness. The findings reveal that responsibility-oriented apologies are more effective in fostering decisional forgiveness, with figurative language enhancing emotional forgiveness in this context. Furthermore, the study identifies a serial mediation where perceived sincerity fosters emotional forgiveness, leading to decisional forgiveness. This study extends the existing literature by systematically exploring how different apology strategies impact forgiveness in customer service settings and highlights the importance of training employees in the use of apologies and language styles. This study also emphasizes the importance of internal marketing efforts aimed at training employees’ capabilities in identifying and handling complaints.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15123,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Business Research\",\"volume\":\"201 \",\"pages\":\"Article 115679\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Business Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296325005028\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296325005028","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

不同道歉类型对服务补偿的影响研究是至关重要的,但尚未得到充分的探讨。基于代价信号理论和语言期望理论,本研究采用实验方法考察了道歉类型(责任导向型和同情导向型)的有效性以及语言风格(字面型和比喻型)在影响顾客原谅方面的调节作用。研究结果表明,以责任为导向的道歉在促进决策宽恕方面更有效,在这种情况下,比喻性语言可以增强情感宽恕。此外,该研究还确定了一系列的中介作用,其中感知到的真诚会促进情感上的宽恕,从而导致果断的宽恕。本研究扩展了现有文献,系统地探讨了不同的道歉策略如何影响客户服务环境中的宽恕,并强调了培训员工使用道歉和语言风格的重要性。本研究还强调了旨在培训员工识别和处理投诉能力的内部营销努力的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Beyond “I am sorry”: Investigating the impacts of apology type and language style on customer forgiveness in service recovery
Research on the effects of different apology types in service recovery is crucial yet underexplored. Drawing upon costly signaling theory and language expectancy theory, this study employs an experimental approach to examine the effectiveness of apology types (responsibility-oriented vs. sympathy-oriented) and the moderating role of language styles (literal vs. figurative) in influencing customer forgiveness. The findings reveal that responsibility-oriented apologies are more effective in fostering decisional forgiveness, with figurative language enhancing emotional forgiveness in this context. Furthermore, the study identifies a serial mediation where perceived sincerity fosters emotional forgiveness, leading to decisional forgiveness. This study extends the existing literature by systematically exploring how different apology strategies impact forgiveness in customer service settings and highlights the importance of training employees in the use of apologies and language styles. This study also emphasizes the importance of internal marketing efforts aimed at training employees’ capabilities in identifying and handling complaints.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.30
自引率
10.60%
发文量
956
期刊介绍: The Journal of Business Research aims to publish research that is rigorous, relevant, and potentially impactful. It examines a wide variety of business decision contexts, processes, and activities, developing insights that are meaningful for theory, practice, and/or society at large. The research is intended to generate meaningful debates in academia and practice, that are thought provoking and have the potential to make a difference to conceptual thinking and/or practice. The Journal is published for a broad range of stakeholders, including scholars, researchers, executives, and policy makers. It aids the application of its research to practical situations and theoretical findings to the reality of the business world as well as to society. The Journal is abstracted and indexed in several databases, including Social Sciences Citation Index, ANBAR, Current Contents, Management Contents, Management Literature in Brief, PsycINFO, Information Service, RePEc, Academic Journal Guide, ABI/Inform, INSPEC, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信