Guilherme Klafke , Jorgelina Torrents , Priscila Teixeira Ferreira , Macarena Sarli , Ana Luiza Loch , Barbara Rauta de Avelar , Thais Ribeiro Correia Azevedo , Fabio Barbour Scott , Nicolás Morel , Santiago Nava , José Reck
{"title":"微型鼻头虫氟拉烷敏感性测定方法的标准化","authors":"Guilherme Klafke , Jorgelina Torrents , Priscila Teixeira Ferreira , Macarena Sarli , Ana Luiza Loch , Barbara Rauta de Avelar , Thais Ribeiro Correia Azevedo , Fabio Barbour Scott , Nicolás Morel , Santiago Nava , José Reck","doi":"10.1016/j.vetpar.2025.110600","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Fluralaner is an isoxazoline acaricide with potent activity against <em>Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus</em>, a major tick species affecting cattle in South America. In this study, larval bioassays were performed to evaluate the baseline susceptibility of <em>R. microplus</em> populations from Brazil and Argentina to fluralaner. The larval packet test (LPT) was applied to Brazilian laboratory and field populations, while the larval immersion test (LIT) was used in Argentina. Both tests were carried with technical grade and a commercial formulation of fluralaner. LPT results showed consistent LC₅₀ values across two susceptible laboratory strains, with resistance ratios near unity in all field samples. Similar observations were obtained with the LIT, with resistance ratios also near 1 for all tested populations from Argentina. The LIT produced LC₅₀ values approximately 100 times lower than the LPT, a difference consistent with previous studies using systemic acaricides. Both technical and commercial formulations yielded comparable results in both tests. These findings confirm the high susceptibility of <em>R. microplus</em> to fluralaner and establish reliable bioassay parameters for future resistance monitoring. The choice between LPT and LIT and technical grade or commercial formulation of fluralaner should be guided by laboratory infrastructure and logistical needs, as both methods are valid for surveillance purposes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23716,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary parasitology","volume":"340 ","pages":"Article 110600"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Standardization of larval bioassays for determination of fluralaner susceptibility in Rhipicephalus microplus\",\"authors\":\"Guilherme Klafke , Jorgelina Torrents , Priscila Teixeira Ferreira , Macarena Sarli , Ana Luiza Loch , Barbara Rauta de Avelar , Thais Ribeiro Correia Azevedo , Fabio Barbour Scott , Nicolás Morel , Santiago Nava , José Reck\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.vetpar.2025.110600\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Fluralaner is an isoxazoline acaricide with potent activity against <em>Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus</em>, a major tick species affecting cattle in South America. In this study, larval bioassays were performed to evaluate the baseline susceptibility of <em>R. microplus</em> populations from Brazil and Argentina to fluralaner. The larval packet test (LPT) was applied to Brazilian laboratory and field populations, while the larval immersion test (LIT) was used in Argentina. Both tests were carried with technical grade and a commercial formulation of fluralaner. LPT results showed consistent LC₅₀ values across two susceptible laboratory strains, with resistance ratios near unity in all field samples. Similar observations were obtained with the LIT, with resistance ratios also near 1 for all tested populations from Argentina. The LIT produced LC₅₀ values approximately 100 times lower than the LPT, a difference consistent with previous studies using systemic acaricides. Both technical and commercial formulations yielded comparable results in both tests. These findings confirm the high susceptibility of <em>R. microplus</em> to fluralaner and establish reliable bioassay parameters for future resistance monitoring. The choice between LPT and LIT and technical grade or commercial formulation of fluralaner should be guided by laboratory infrastructure and logistical needs, as both methods are valid for surveillance purposes.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23716,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Veterinary parasitology\",\"volume\":\"340 \",\"pages\":\"Article 110600\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Veterinary parasitology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304401725002110\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PARASITOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary parasitology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304401725002110","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PARASITOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Standardization of larval bioassays for determination of fluralaner susceptibility in Rhipicephalus microplus
Fluralaner is an isoxazoline acaricide with potent activity against Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus, a major tick species affecting cattle in South America. In this study, larval bioassays were performed to evaluate the baseline susceptibility of R. microplus populations from Brazil and Argentina to fluralaner. The larval packet test (LPT) was applied to Brazilian laboratory and field populations, while the larval immersion test (LIT) was used in Argentina. Both tests were carried with technical grade and a commercial formulation of fluralaner. LPT results showed consistent LC₅₀ values across two susceptible laboratory strains, with resistance ratios near unity in all field samples. Similar observations were obtained with the LIT, with resistance ratios also near 1 for all tested populations from Argentina. The LIT produced LC₅₀ values approximately 100 times lower than the LPT, a difference consistent with previous studies using systemic acaricides. Both technical and commercial formulations yielded comparable results in both tests. These findings confirm the high susceptibility of R. microplus to fluralaner and establish reliable bioassay parameters for future resistance monitoring. The choice between LPT and LIT and technical grade or commercial formulation of fluralaner should be guided by laboratory infrastructure and logistical needs, as both methods are valid for surveillance purposes.
期刊介绍:
The journal Veterinary Parasitology has an open access mirror journal,Veterinary Parasitology: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review.
This journal is concerned with those aspects of helminthology, protozoology and entomology which are of interest to animal health investigators, veterinary practitioners and others with a special interest in parasitology. Papers of the highest quality dealing with all aspects of disease prevention, pathology, treatment, epidemiology, and control of parasites in all domesticated animals, fall within the scope of the journal. Papers of geographically limited (local) interest which are not of interest to an international audience will not be accepted. Authors who submit papers based on local data will need to indicate why their paper is relevant to a broader readership.
Parasitological studies on laboratory animals fall within the scope of the journal only if they provide a reasonably close model of a disease of domestic animals. Additionally the journal will consider papers relating to wildlife species where they may act as disease reservoirs to domestic animals, or as a zoonotic reservoir. Case studies considered to be unique or of specific interest to the journal, will also be considered on occasions at the Editors'' discretion. Papers dealing exclusively with the taxonomy of parasites do not fall within the scope of the journal.