大麦在东亚北部传播的时间和文化环境背景

IF 1.5 2区 历史学 0 ARCHAEOLOGY
Christian Leipe , Elena A. Sergusheva , Martine Robbeets , Patrick Wertmann , Nikolay N. Kradin , Mayke Wagner , Pavel E. Tarasov
{"title":"大麦在东亚北部传播的时间和文化环境背景","authors":"Christian Leipe ,&nbsp;Elena A. Sergusheva ,&nbsp;Martine Robbeets ,&nbsp;Patrick Wertmann ,&nbsp;Nikolay N. Kradin ,&nbsp;Mayke Wagner ,&nbsp;Pavel E. Tarasov","doi":"10.1016/j.jasrep.2025.105372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>While the introduction of wheat into early full-scale farming systems of northern China has received much research attention over the past two decades, few studies have looked at when and how the cultivation of barley, which is better adapted to colder climates, spread across East Asia. New radiocarbon (<sup>14</sup>C) dates obtained from archaeological barley grains together with material evidence suggest that the crop was introduced to Primorye (Russia’s border region with China and North Korea) no later than the 2nd century BCE, although an earlier arrival sometime between the 4th and 3rd centuries BCE seems possible. From Primorye, the crop probably spread further eastward to Hokkaido. The combined archaeological and chronological evidence suggests that barley-cultivating cultural groups may have migrated to southern Primorye from areas to the west or from southern Liaoning/north-western Korea, which rules out a dispersal via the northern Eurasian steppes or the Japanese archipelago. We propose that a combination of cultural and climatic factors was the driving force behind this migration. While we identify the eastward expansion of the Warring State of Yan around 300 BCE as the primary driver that pushed barley-cultivating populations to migrate, it seems possible that long-term cooling and drying less favourable for farming during 1000–300 BCE added to the political unrest at the northern and eastern boundaries of the Chinese Warring States, or may even have amplified their policies of territorial expansion.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48150,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Archaeological Science-Reports","volume":"67 ","pages":"Article 105372"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Timing and cultural-environmental context of the spread of barley to and within northern East Asia\",\"authors\":\"Christian Leipe ,&nbsp;Elena A. Sergusheva ,&nbsp;Martine Robbeets ,&nbsp;Patrick Wertmann ,&nbsp;Nikolay N. Kradin ,&nbsp;Mayke Wagner ,&nbsp;Pavel E. Tarasov\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jasrep.2025.105372\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>While the introduction of wheat into early full-scale farming systems of northern China has received much research attention over the past two decades, few studies have looked at when and how the cultivation of barley, which is better adapted to colder climates, spread across East Asia. New radiocarbon (<sup>14</sup>C) dates obtained from archaeological barley grains together with material evidence suggest that the crop was introduced to Primorye (Russia’s border region with China and North Korea) no later than the 2nd century BCE, although an earlier arrival sometime between the 4th and 3rd centuries BCE seems possible. From Primorye, the crop probably spread further eastward to Hokkaido. The combined archaeological and chronological evidence suggests that barley-cultivating cultural groups may have migrated to southern Primorye from areas to the west or from southern Liaoning/north-western Korea, which rules out a dispersal via the northern Eurasian steppes or the Japanese archipelago. We propose that a combination of cultural and climatic factors was the driving force behind this migration. While we identify the eastward expansion of the Warring State of Yan around 300 BCE as the primary driver that pushed barley-cultivating populations to migrate, it seems possible that long-term cooling and drying less favourable for farming during 1000–300 BCE added to the political unrest at the northern and eastern boundaries of the Chinese Warring States, or may even have amplified their policies of territorial expansion.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48150,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Archaeological Science-Reports\",\"volume\":\"67 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105372\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Archaeological Science-Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352409X25004055\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHAEOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Archaeological Science-Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352409X25004055","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去的二十年里,中国北方早期全面农业系统中小麦的引入受到了很多研究的关注,但很少有研究关注大麦的种植是何时以及如何在东亚传播的,大麦更适应寒冷的气候。从考古大麦颗粒中获得的新的放射性碳(14C)年代和物质证据表明,这种作物不迟于公元前2世纪被引入滨海边疆区(俄罗斯与中国和朝鲜的边境地区),尽管可能在公元前4世纪到公元前3世纪之间的某个时间更早到达。从滨海边疆区,这种作物可能进一步向东传播到北海道。综合考古和年代证据表明,种植大麦的文化群体可能是从西部地区或从辽宁南部/朝鲜西北部迁移到滨海地区南部的,这就排除了通过欧亚北部草原或日本群岛扩散的可能性。我们认为,文化和气候因素的结合是这次迁移背后的驱动力。虽然我们认为公元前300年左右燕国的东扩是推动大麦种植人口迁移的主要驱动力,但公元前1000-300年期间不利于农业的长期降温和干旱似乎增加了中国战国北部和东部边界的政治动荡,甚至可能扩大了他们的领土扩张政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Timing and cultural-environmental context of the spread of barley to and within northern East Asia
While the introduction of wheat into early full-scale farming systems of northern China has received much research attention over the past two decades, few studies have looked at when and how the cultivation of barley, which is better adapted to colder climates, spread across East Asia. New radiocarbon (14C) dates obtained from archaeological barley grains together with material evidence suggest that the crop was introduced to Primorye (Russia’s border region with China and North Korea) no later than the 2nd century BCE, although an earlier arrival sometime between the 4th and 3rd centuries BCE seems possible. From Primorye, the crop probably spread further eastward to Hokkaido. The combined archaeological and chronological evidence suggests that barley-cultivating cultural groups may have migrated to southern Primorye from areas to the west or from southern Liaoning/north-western Korea, which rules out a dispersal via the northern Eurasian steppes or the Japanese archipelago. We propose that a combination of cultural and climatic factors was the driving force behind this migration. While we identify the eastward expansion of the Warring State of Yan around 300 BCE as the primary driver that pushed barley-cultivating populations to migrate, it seems possible that long-term cooling and drying less favourable for farming during 1000–300 BCE added to the political unrest at the northern and eastern boundaries of the Chinese Warring States, or may even have amplified their policies of territorial expansion.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
405
期刊介绍: Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports is aimed at archaeologists and scientists engaged with the application of scientific techniques and methodologies to all areas of archaeology. The journal focuses on the results of the application of scientific methods to archaeological problems and debates. It will provide a forum for reviews and scientific debate of issues in scientific archaeology and their impact in the wider subject. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports will publish papers of excellent archaeological science, with regional or wider interest. This will include case studies, reviews and short papers where an established scientific technique sheds light on archaeological questions and debates.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信