Getachew Gudero Mengasha , Keyredin S. Salo , Habtamu Terefe , Ashenafi Kassaye
{"title":"在埃塞俄比亚南部,栽培和化学相结合的策略减少了叶螨(Phthorimaea absoluta Meyrick)侵染造成的番茄产量损失","authors":"Getachew Gudero Mengasha , Keyredin S. Salo , Habtamu Terefe , Ashenafi Kassaye","doi":"10.1016/j.cropro.2025.107397","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Tomato isglobally important vegetable crop, but its productivity is significantly threatened by the leafminer (<em>Phthorimaea absoluta</em>), a highly destructive pest that damages leaf and fruit. Although chemical control remains the main management tactic for leafminer, its indiscriminate use poses risks to non-target organisms. Integrated management strategy, combining cultural and chemical tactics, offers an alternative control measure with multiple advantages. Field experiments were conducted in 2020 and 2021 at Arba Minch (AM) and Mihirab Abaya (MA) in southern Ethiopia to evaluate the effectiveness of integrating cultural practices (earthing-up) with various ratios of different insecticide sprays in reducing leafminer damage, minimizing yield losses, and enhancing tomato agronomic performance. Twenty-two treatments were factorial arranged within a randomized complete block design with three replications. Results showed that three-time earthing-up combined with 50 % Spinosad and 100 % Nimbicidine significantly reduced larval populations (83.76 % and 86.99 %) and leaf-mining (75.84 % and 68.70 %) while lowering leaf damage (9.59 % and 10.07 %) and increasing marketable yield (46.96 and 48.52 t ha<sup>−1</sup>) compared to untreated controls at AM and MA, respectively. This treatment also minimized yield loss by 80.75 % and 76.07 % and increased yield advantage by 419.47 % and 317.92 % at AM and MA, in that order. However, financial analysis revealed that two-time earthing-up combined with 50 % Spinosad and 50 % Nimbicidine provided the highest benefit-cost ratio (49.38 and 50.03) at AM and MA, respectively. The study concludes that integrating two-time earthing-up with 50 % Spinosad and 50 % Nimbicidine is an effective, economically viable approach for leafminer management, optimizing tomato yield while maximizing financial returns. This approach is recommended for effective leafminer management in tomato production systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10785,"journal":{"name":"Crop Protection","volume":"198 ","pages":"Article 107397"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Combined cultural and chemical tactics reduce tomato yield loss from leafminer (Phthorimaea absoluta Meyrick (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae)) infestations in Southern Ethiopia\",\"authors\":\"Getachew Gudero Mengasha , Keyredin S. Salo , Habtamu Terefe , Ashenafi Kassaye\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cropro.2025.107397\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Tomato isglobally important vegetable crop, but its productivity is significantly threatened by the leafminer (<em>Phthorimaea absoluta</em>), a highly destructive pest that damages leaf and fruit. Although chemical control remains the main management tactic for leafminer, its indiscriminate use poses risks to non-target organisms. Integrated management strategy, combining cultural and chemical tactics, offers an alternative control measure with multiple advantages. Field experiments were conducted in 2020 and 2021 at Arba Minch (AM) and Mihirab Abaya (MA) in southern Ethiopia to evaluate the effectiveness of integrating cultural practices (earthing-up) with various ratios of different insecticide sprays in reducing leafminer damage, minimizing yield losses, and enhancing tomato agronomic performance. Twenty-two treatments were factorial arranged within a randomized complete block design with three replications. Results showed that three-time earthing-up combined with 50 % Spinosad and 100 % Nimbicidine significantly reduced larval populations (83.76 % and 86.99 %) and leaf-mining (75.84 % and 68.70 %) while lowering leaf damage (9.59 % and 10.07 %) and increasing marketable yield (46.96 and 48.52 t ha<sup>−1</sup>) compared to untreated controls at AM and MA, respectively. This treatment also minimized yield loss by 80.75 % and 76.07 % and increased yield advantage by 419.47 % and 317.92 % at AM and MA, in that order. However, financial analysis revealed that two-time earthing-up combined with 50 % Spinosad and 50 % Nimbicidine provided the highest benefit-cost ratio (49.38 and 50.03) at AM and MA, respectively. The study concludes that integrating two-time earthing-up with 50 % Spinosad and 50 % Nimbicidine is an effective, economically viable approach for leafminer management, optimizing tomato yield while maximizing financial returns. This approach is recommended for effective leafminer management in tomato production systems.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10785,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Crop Protection\",\"volume\":\"198 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107397\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Crop Protection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261219425002893\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crop Protection","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261219425002893","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Combined cultural and chemical tactics reduce tomato yield loss from leafminer (Phthorimaea absoluta Meyrick (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae)) infestations in Southern Ethiopia
Tomato isglobally important vegetable crop, but its productivity is significantly threatened by the leafminer (Phthorimaea absoluta), a highly destructive pest that damages leaf and fruit. Although chemical control remains the main management tactic for leafminer, its indiscriminate use poses risks to non-target organisms. Integrated management strategy, combining cultural and chemical tactics, offers an alternative control measure with multiple advantages. Field experiments were conducted in 2020 and 2021 at Arba Minch (AM) and Mihirab Abaya (MA) in southern Ethiopia to evaluate the effectiveness of integrating cultural practices (earthing-up) with various ratios of different insecticide sprays in reducing leafminer damage, minimizing yield losses, and enhancing tomato agronomic performance. Twenty-two treatments were factorial arranged within a randomized complete block design with three replications. Results showed that three-time earthing-up combined with 50 % Spinosad and 100 % Nimbicidine significantly reduced larval populations (83.76 % and 86.99 %) and leaf-mining (75.84 % and 68.70 %) while lowering leaf damage (9.59 % and 10.07 %) and increasing marketable yield (46.96 and 48.52 t ha−1) compared to untreated controls at AM and MA, respectively. This treatment also minimized yield loss by 80.75 % and 76.07 % and increased yield advantage by 419.47 % and 317.92 % at AM and MA, in that order. However, financial analysis revealed that two-time earthing-up combined with 50 % Spinosad and 50 % Nimbicidine provided the highest benefit-cost ratio (49.38 and 50.03) at AM and MA, respectively. The study concludes that integrating two-time earthing-up with 50 % Spinosad and 50 % Nimbicidine is an effective, economically viable approach for leafminer management, optimizing tomato yield while maximizing financial returns. This approach is recommended for effective leafminer management in tomato production systems.
期刊介绍:
The Editors of Crop Protection especially welcome papers describing an interdisciplinary approach showing how different control strategies can be integrated into practical pest management programs, covering high and low input agricultural systems worldwide. Crop Protection particularly emphasizes the practical aspects of control in the field and for protected crops, and includes work which may lead in the near future to more effective control. The journal does not duplicate the many existing excellent biological science journals, which deal mainly with the more fundamental aspects of plant pathology, applied zoology and weed science. Crop Protection covers all practical aspects of pest, disease and weed control, including the following topics:
-Abiotic damage-
Agronomic control methods-
Assessment of pest and disease damage-
Molecular methods for the detection and assessment of pests and diseases-
Biological control-
Biorational pesticides-
Control of animal pests of world crops-
Control of diseases of crop plants caused by microorganisms-
Control of weeds and integrated management-
Economic considerations-
Effects of plant growth regulators-
Environmental benefits of reduced pesticide use-
Environmental effects of pesticides-
Epidemiology of pests and diseases in relation to control-
GM Crops, and genetic engineering applications-
Importance and control of postharvest crop losses-
Integrated control-
Interrelationships and compatibility among different control strategies-
Invasive species as they relate to implications for crop protection-
Pesticide application methods-
Pest management-
Phytobiomes for pest and disease control-
Resistance management-
Sampling and monitoring schemes for diseases, nematodes, pests and weeds.