{"title":"2019冠状病毒病对定点住院机构一般医疗康复效率的影响:患者预后和护理流程的比较分析","authors":"Perrine Ferré PhD , Yang Han (Stacey) B.Sc. , Louis-David Beaulieu PhD , Johanne Higgins PhD , Marie-Hélène Milot PhD , Marie-Hélène Boudrias PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.arrct.2025.100487","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate how the COVID-19 pandemic affected rehabilitation outcomes and care delivery processes in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation programs of COVID-19-designated rehabilitation facilities.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Retrospective cohort study comparing care processes and outcomes between prepandemic and pandemic periods and identifying factors that influenced rehabilitation efficiency using the total score of the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) instrument.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>Four designated subacute rehabilitation facilities.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>Patients (N=507) from the Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation program (PMR), with a mean age of 78.3 years (range: 28-99y) and 60% women (ranging from 58% to 64% across groups). The cohort included prepandemic patients (33%), non-COVID-19 patients during the pandemic (33%), patients who were COVID-19-positive before admission (23%), and those who acquired COVID-19 during rehabilitation (11%).</div></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><div>Not applicable.</div></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><div>Average daily gain in functional independence using the FIM total score (FIM efficiency), clinical and demographic profiles at admission, functional outcomes, and indicators of care delivery processes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>While functional outcomes were mostly similar across groups (FIM total score at discharge, <em>P</em>≥.05), patients who acquired COVID-19 during rehabilitation experienced longer stays (mean difference=32.2d, <em>P</em><.001) and higher rehospitalization rates (48%, <em>P</em><.001). In contrast, those infected before admission had shorter stays (mean difference=−9.5d, <em>P</em><.001) and less multidisciplinary involvement (mean difference=1 discipline, <em>P</em><.001). Linear mixed effects modeling, with rehabilitation site as random effects, demonstrated that COVID-19 acquisition during rehabilitation and increased multidisciplinary care were significant predictors of reduced FIM efficiency (<em>P</em><.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The COVID-19 pandemic affected rehabilitation care delivery processes more than functional outcomes. Patients who acquired COVID-19 during rehabilitation and those requiring more diverse multidisciplinary care showed reduced FIM efficiency, highlighting the importance of infection control measures in rehabilitation settings. These insights will help health care professionals and decision makers optimize future crisis preparedness plans for rehabilitation services.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72291,"journal":{"name":"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation","volume":"7 3","pages":"Article 100487"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of COVID-19 on General Medical Rehabilitation Efficiency in Designated Inpatient Facilities: A Comparative Analysis of Patient Outcomes and Care Processes\",\"authors\":\"Perrine Ferré PhD , Yang Han (Stacey) B.Sc. , Louis-David Beaulieu PhD , Johanne Higgins PhD , Marie-Hélène Milot PhD , Marie-Hélène Boudrias PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.arrct.2025.100487\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate how the COVID-19 pandemic affected rehabilitation outcomes and care delivery processes in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation programs of COVID-19-designated rehabilitation facilities.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Retrospective cohort study comparing care processes and outcomes between prepandemic and pandemic periods and identifying factors that influenced rehabilitation efficiency using the total score of the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) instrument.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>Four designated subacute rehabilitation facilities.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>Patients (N=507) from the Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation program (PMR), with a mean age of 78.3 years (range: 28-99y) and 60% women (ranging from 58% to 64% across groups). The cohort included prepandemic patients (33%), non-COVID-19 patients during the pandemic (33%), patients who were COVID-19-positive before admission (23%), and those who acquired COVID-19 during rehabilitation (11%).</div></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><div>Not applicable.</div></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><div>Average daily gain in functional independence using the FIM total score (FIM efficiency), clinical and demographic profiles at admission, functional outcomes, and indicators of care delivery processes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>While functional outcomes were mostly similar across groups (FIM total score at discharge, <em>P</em>≥.05), patients who acquired COVID-19 during rehabilitation experienced longer stays (mean difference=32.2d, <em>P</em><.001) and higher rehospitalization rates (48%, <em>P</em><.001). In contrast, those infected before admission had shorter stays (mean difference=−9.5d, <em>P</em><.001) and less multidisciplinary involvement (mean difference=1 discipline, <em>P</em><.001). Linear mixed effects modeling, with rehabilitation site as random effects, demonstrated that COVID-19 acquisition during rehabilitation and increased multidisciplinary care were significant predictors of reduced FIM efficiency (<em>P</em><.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The COVID-19 pandemic affected rehabilitation care delivery processes more than functional outcomes. Patients who acquired COVID-19 during rehabilitation and those requiring more diverse multidisciplinary care showed reduced FIM efficiency, highlighting the importance of infection control measures in rehabilitation settings. These insights will help health care professionals and decision makers optimize future crisis preparedness plans for rehabilitation services.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72291,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation\",\"volume\":\"7 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 100487\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S259010952500062X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S259010952500062X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的评估2019冠状病毒病大流行对指定康复机构物理医学和康复项目康复结果和护理提供流程的影响。设计回顾性队列研究,比较大流行前和大流行时期的护理过程和结果,并使用功能独立性测量(FIM)工具的总分确定影响康复效率的因素。指定亚急性康复设施4个。参与者(N=507)来自物理医学和康复计划(PMR),平均年龄为78.3岁(范围:28-99岁),60%为女性(组间范围为58%至64%)。该队列包括大流行前患者(33%)、大流行期间非COVID-19患者(33%)、入院前COVID-19阳性患者(23%)和康复期间获得COVID-19的患者(11%)。InterventionsNot适用。主要结果测量:使用FIM总分(FIM效率)、入院时的临床和人口统计资料、功能结果和护理过程指标,功能独立性的平均每日增益。结果两组功能结局基本相似(出院时FIM总分,P≥0.05),但在康复期间获得COVID-19的患者住院时间更长(平均差异=32.2d, P < 0.01),再住院率更高(48%,P < 0.01)。相比之下,入院前感染的患者住院时间较短(平均差值= - 9.5d, P<.001),涉及的多学科较少(平均差值=1个学科,P<.001)。以康复地点为随机效应的线性混合效应模型表明,康复期间COVID-19的获取和多学科护理的增加是FIM效率降低的重要预测因素(P<.001)。结论2019冠状病毒病大流行对康复护理提供过程的影响大于功能结局。在康复期间感染COVID-19的患者和需要更多样化多学科护理的患者显示FIM效率降低,这突出了康复环境中感染控制措施的重要性。这些见解将有助于卫生保健专业人员和决策者优化未来的康复服务危机准备计划。
Impact of COVID-19 on General Medical Rehabilitation Efficiency in Designated Inpatient Facilities: A Comparative Analysis of Patient Outcomes and Care Processes
Objective
To evaluate how the COVID-19 pandemic affected rehabilitation outcomes and care delivery processes in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation programs of COVID-19-designated rehabilitation facilities.
Design
Retrospective cohort study comparing care processes and outcomes between prepandemic and pandemic periods and identifying factors that influenced rehabilitation efficiency using the total score of the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) instrument.
Setting
Four designated subacute rehabilitation facilities.
Participants
Patients (N=507) from the Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation program (PMR), with a mean age of 78.3 years (range: 28-99y) and 60% women (ranging from 58% to 64% across groups). The cohort included prepandemic patients (33%), non-COVID-19 patients during the pandemic (33%), patients who were COVID-19-positive before admission (23%), and those who acquired COVID-19 during rehabilitation (11%).
Interventions
Not applicable.
Main Outcome Measures
Average daily gain in functional independence using the FIM total score (FIM efficiency), clinical and demographic profiles at admission, functional outcomes, and indicators of care delivery processes.
Results
While functional outcomes were mostly similar across groups (FIM total score at discharge, P≥.05), patients who acquired COVID-19 during rehabilitation experienced longer stays (mean difference=32.2d, P<.001) and higher rehospitalization rates (48%, P<.001). In contrast, those infected before admission had shorter stays (mean difference=−9.5d, P<.001) and less multidisciplinary involvement (mean difference=1 discipline, P<.001). Linear mixed effects modeling, with rehabilitation site as random effects, demonstrated that COVID-19 acquisition during rehabilitation and increased multidisciplinary care were significant predictors of reduced FIM efficiency (P<.001).
Conclusions
The COVID-19 pandemic affected rehabilitation care delivery processes more than functional outcomes. Patients who acquired COVID-19 during rehabilitation and those requiring more diverse multidisciplinary care showed reduced FIM efficiency, highlighting the importance of infection control measures in rehabilitation settings. These insights will help health care professionals and decision makers optimize future crisis preparedness plans for rehabilitation services.