Xin Meng, Minjung Lee, Lingzhi Chu, Soohyun Nam* and Kai Chen*,
{"title":"个人和环境温度在小时尺度上的差异:来自可穿戴传感器和环境建模的见解","authors":"Xin Meng, Minjung Lee, Lingzhi Chu, Soohyun Nam* and Kai Chen*, ","doi":"10.1021/acs.estlett.5c00672","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Accurate assessment of personal exposure to ambient temperature is essential for understanding temperature-related health impacts. However, the bias from using ambient temperature estimates as proxies for personal exposure remains underexplored, particularly on the hourly scale. This study integrated wearable temperature sensors with a high-resolution (1 km, hourly) ambient temperature model to evaluate individual-level ambient exposure among 94 individuals in Connecticut, USA, monitored across seasons between October 2023 and January 2025. Personal temperature was consistently higher than ambient temperature, with a larger difference during cooler months. The hourly difference exhibited a distinct unimodal diurnal pattern, smallest in the early afternoon. Linear mixed-effects models identified ambient temperature, hour of day, month, solar radiation, and the nightlight index as the key predictors of personal temperature and its deviation from ambient conditions. The temperature difference was well characterized by the model (marginal R<sup>2</sup> of 0.854). Extreme gradient boosting with SHapley Additive Explanations confirmed the ambient temperature and hour of day as the most influential features, with albedo and other environmental factors showing smaller effects. Findings highlight systematic seasonal and diurnal biases in ambient-based metrics, underscoring the need to account for these patterns in the assessment of thermal exposures.</p>","PeriodicalId":37,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Technology Letters Environ.","volume":"12 9","pages":"1154–1161"},"PeriodicalIF":8.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Discrepancies between Personal and Ambient Temperatures at Hourly Scale: Insights from Wearable Sensors and Environmental Modeling\",\"authors\":\"Xin Meng, Minjung Lee, Lingzhi Chu, Soohyun Nam* and Kai Chen*, \",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.estlett.5c00672\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >Accurate assessment of personal exposure to ambient temperature is essential for understanding temperature-related health impacts. However, the bias from using ambient temperature estimates as proxies for personal exposure remains underexplored, particularly on the hourly scale. This study integrated wearable temperature sensors with a high-resolution (1 km, hourly) ambient temperature model to evaluate individual-level ambient exposure among 94 individuals in Connecticut, USA, monitored across seasons between October 2023 and January 2025. Personal temperature was consistently higher than ambient temperature, with a larger difference during cooler months. The hourly difference exhibited a distinct unimodal diurnal pattern, smallest in the early afternoon. Linear mixed-effects models identified ambient temperature, hour of day, month, solar radiation, and the nightlight index as the key predictors of personal temperature and its deviation from ambient conditions. The temperature difference was well characterized by the model (marginal R<sup>2</sup> of 0.854). Extreme gradient boosting with SHapley Additive Explanations confirmed the ambient temperature and hour of day as the most influential features, with albedo and other environmental factors showing smaller effects. Findings highlight systematic seasonal and diurnal biases in ambient-based metrics, underscoring the need to account for these patterns in the assessment of thermal exposures.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Science & Technology Letters Environ.\",\"volume\":\"12 9\",\"pages\":\"1154–1161\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Science & Technology Letters Environ.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.estlett.5c00672\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Science & Technology Letters Environ.","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.estlett.5c00672","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Discrepancies between Personal and Ambient Temperatures at Hourly Scale: Insights from Wearable Sensors and Environmental Modeling
Accurate assessment of personal exposure to ambient temperature is essential for understanding temperature-related health impacts. However, the bias from using ambient temperature estimates as proxies for personal exposure remains underexplored, particularly on the hourly scale. This study integrated wearable temperature sensors with a high-resolution (1 km, hourly) ambient temperature model to evaluate individual-level ambient exposure among 94 individuals in Connecticut, USA, monitored across seasons between October 2023 and January 2025. Personal temperature was consistently higher than ambient temperature, with a larger difference during cooler months. The hourly difference exhibited a distinct unimodal diurnal pattern, smallest in the early afternoon. Linear mixed-effects models identified ambient temperature, hour of day, month, solar radiation, and the nightlight index as the key predictors of personal temperature and its deviation from ambient conditions. The temperature difference was well characterized by the model (marginal R2 of 0.854). Extreme gradient boosting with SHapley Additive Explanations confirmed the ambient temperature and hour of day as the most influential features, with albedo and other environmental factors showing smaller effects. Findings highlight systematic seasonal and diurnal biases in ambient-based metrics, underscoring the need to account for these patterns in the assessment of thermal exposures.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Science & Technology Letters serves as an international forum for brief communications on experimental or theoretical results of exceptional timeliness in all aspects of environmental science, both pure and applied. Published as soon as accepted, these communications are summarized in monthly issues. Additionally, the journal features short reviews on emerging topics in environmental science and technology.