当地子公司在实现循环经济目标的战略、知识和数字化转型方面是否具有独特的特点?

IF 15.5 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Matteo Pozzoli, Raffaela Nastari, Sabrina Pisano, Francesco Schiavone
{"title":"当地子公司在实现循环经济目标的战略、知识和数字化转型方面是否具有独特的特点?","authors":"Matteo Pozzoli,&nbsp;Raffaela Nastari,&nbsp;Sabrina Pisano,&nbsp;Francesco Schiavone","doi":"10.1016/j.jik.2025.100802","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines how circular business models (CBMs) and industry 4.0 technologies (I4.0Ts) can connect in the specific context of local subsidiaries. The study adopted a case study methodology, involving twelve semi-structured interviews with key board members of Schneider Electric. Multiple methods of data collection were used to derive robust findings, including interviews, reviews of company sustainability reports, and participation in a workshop organised by the company to learn about its operations. Interview data were analysed using thematic analysis. The results suggest that I4.0Ts may positively influence resource use reduction and circular economy (CE) goals. However, given the study’s qualitative nature and single-company scope, these findings should be interpreted as indicative rather than broadly generalisable. The adoption of I4.0Ts appears driven mainly by legitimacy, stakeholder consensus needs, and regulatory compliance pressures. The study is based on a single case and primarily qualitative evidence; broader validation through comparative or quantitative research would strengthen the robustness of the insights. This research offers tentative insights for other companies considering CE-oriented digital transitions, highlighting potential benefits and challenges. Policymakers are encouraged to support firms in addressing knowledge transfer and workforce resistance barriers. This study adds to the debate on how local subsidiaries can contribute to the CE through I4.0Ts, while also stressing the need for a cautious interpretation of claims about universal advantages.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46792,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Innovation & Knowledge","volume":"10 5","pages":"Article 100802"},"PeriodicalIF":15.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do local subsidiaries have unique characteristics in strategies, knowledge, and digital transformation efforts to achieve circular economy goals?\",\"authors\":\"Matteo Pozzoli,&nbsp;Raffaela Nastari,&nbsp;Sabrina Pisano,&nbsp;Francesco Schiavone\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jik.2025.100802\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study examines how circular business models (CBMs) and industry 4.0 technologies (I4.0Ts) can connect in the specific context of local subsidiaries. The study adopted a case study methodology, involving twelve semi-structured interviews with key board members of Schneider Electric. Multiple methods of data collection were used to derive robust findings, including interviews, reviews of company sustainability reports, and participation in a workshop organised by the company to learn about its operations. Interview data were analysed using thematic analysis. The results suggest that I4.0Ts may positively influence resource use reduction and circular economy (CE) goals. However, given the study’s qualitative nature and single-company scope, these findings should be interpreted as indicative rather than broadly generalisable. The adoption of I4.0Ts appears driven mainly by legitimacy, stakeholder consensus needs, and regulatory compliance pressures. The study is based on a single case and primarily qualitative evidence; broader validation through comparative or quantitative research would strengthen the robustness of the insights. This research offers tentative insights for other companies considering CE-oriented digital transitions, highlighting potential benefits and challenges. Policymakers are encouraged to support firms in addressing knowledge transfer and workforce resistance barriers. This study adds to the debate on how local subsidiaries can contribute to the CE through I4.0Ts, while also stressing the need for a cautious interpretation of claims about universal advantages.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46792,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Innovation & Knowledge\",\"volume\":\"10 5\",\"pages\":\"Article 100802\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":15.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Innovation & Knowledge\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2444569X25001477\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Innovation & Knowledge","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2444569X25001477","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了循环商业模式(CBMs)和工业4.0技术(i4.0 t)如何在当地子公司的特定背景下联系起来。本研究采用案例研究方法,对施耐德电气主要董事会成员进行了12次半结构化访谈。我们使用了多种数据收集方法,包括访谈、公司可持续发展报告的审查,以及参加公司组织的研讨会,以了解其运营情况,以得出可靠的发现。访谈数据采用专题分析进行分析。结果表明,I4.0Ts对资源利用减少和循环经济目标有积极影响。然而,考虑到研究的定性性质和单一公司的范围,这些发现应该被解释为指示性的,而不是广泛的推广。i4.0 t的采用似乎主要受到合法性、涉众共识需求和法规遵从压力的驱动。该研究基于单一案例,主要是定性证据;通过比较或定量研究进行更广泛的验证将加强见解的稳健性。这项研究为其他考虑以ce为导向的数字化转型的公司提供了初步的见解,突出了潜在的好处和挑战。鼓励政策制定者支持企业解决知识转移和劳动力阻力障碍。本研究增加了关于本地子公司如何通过4.0技术为环境绩效做出贡献的争论,同时也强调了对普遍优势主张的谨慎解释的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Do local subsidiaries have unique characteristics in strategies, knowledge, and digital transformation efforts to achieve circular economy goals?
This study examines how circular business models (CBMs) and industry 4.0 technologies (I4.0Ts) can connect in the specific context of local subsidiaries. The study adopted a case study methodology, involving twelve semi-structured interviews with key board members of Schneider Electric. Multiple methods of data collection were used to derive robust findings, including interviews, reviews of company sustainability reports, and participation in a workshop organised by the company to learn about its operations. Interview data were analysed using thematic analysis. The results suggest that I4.0Ts may positively influence resource use reduction and circular economy (CE) goals. However, given the study’s qualitative nature and single-company scope, these findings should be interpreted as indicative rather than broadly generalisable. The adoption of I4.0Ts appears driven mainly by legitimacy, stakeholder consensus needs, and regulatory compliance pressures. The study is based on a single case and primarily qualitative evidence; broader validation through comparative or quantitative research would strengthen the robustness of the insights. This research offers tentative insights for other companies considering CE-oriented digital transitions, highlighting potential benefits and challenges. Policymakers are encouraged to support firms in addressing knowledge transfer and workforce resistance barriers. This study adds to the debate on how local subsidiaries can contribute to the CE through I4.0Ts, while also stressing the need for a cautious interpretation of claims about universal advantages.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.10
自引率
12.70%
发文量
118
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Innovation and Knowledge (JIK) explores how innovation drives knowledge creation and vice versa, emphasizing that not all innovation leads to knowledge, but enduring innovation across diverse fields fosters theory and knowledge. JIK invites papers on innovations enhancing or generating knowledge, covering innovation processes, structures, outcomes, and behaviors at various levels. Articles in JIK examine knowledge-related changes promoting innovation for societal best practices. JIK serves as a platform for high-quality studies undergoing double-blind peer review, ensuring global dissemination to scholars, practitioners, and policymakers who recognize innovation and knowledge as economic drivers. It publishes theoretical articles, empirical studies, case studies, reviews, and other content, addressing current trends and emerging topics in innovation and knowledge. The journal welcomes suggestions for special issues and encourages articles to showcase contextual differences and lessons for a broad audience. In essence, JIK is an interdisciplinary journal dedicated to advancing theoretical and practical innovations and knowledge across multiple fields, including Economics, Business and Management, Engineering, Science, and Education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信