某三级医院临床神经生理学随叫随到期间脑电图对医疗保健的影响。

F. Vázquez-Sánchez , M.C. Lloria-Gil , B. García-López , O. Pérez-Gil , A. Saponaro-González , E. Rivas-Navas , A.I. Gómez-Menéndez
{"title":"某三级医院临床神经生理学随叫随到期间脑电图对医疗保健的影响。","authors":"F. Vázquez-Sánchez ,&nbsp;M.C. Lloria-Gil ,&nbsp;B. García-López ,&nbsp;O. Pérez-Gil ,&nbsp;A. Saponaro-González ,&nbsp;E. Rivas-Navas ,&nbsp;A.I. Gómez-Menéndez","doi":"10.1016/j.nrleng.2025.09.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The electroencephalogram (EEG) is a useful tool in the diagnosis of pathologies such as non-convulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) or brain death (BD), cardiac arrest (CA), and status epilepticus (SE) treatment monitoring. In addition, it provides irreplaceable information depending on the time it is performed, as is the case with the diagnosis of epilepsy after a first epileptic seizure (ES) or to differentiate these from non-epileptic paroxysmal events (NEPE). Its usefulness is maintained outside the usual working day, but it is not available in many centers.</div></div><div><h3>Subjects and methods</h3><div>Retrospective observational study based on the clinical history of 86 patients who underwent an on-call EEG (ocEEG) at our hospital during 2020.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>One hundred two records requested by Intensive Care (41.1%), Neurology (37.3%), Pediatrics (17.6%) or other services (4%) were made. Suspected NCSE represented 56.7%, followed by treatment monitoring in EE (21.6%). The ME accounted for only 6.9% of the total. The ocEEG avoided potential iatrogenesis in a 56.3% of cases with therapeutic implications, allowed to treat 27.58% of patients who would have remained without treatment until the conventional EEG. An increase in the level of care was required in only 22,2% of all cases. The ocEEG was anticipated a mean of 31.6 hours to the next conventional EEG that would have been available.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The availability of ocEEG is beneficial in terms of diagnosis, therapy, and hospital management, advancing decision-making and avoiding iatrogenesis. Its availability should become widespread.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94155,"journal":{"name":"Neurologia","volume":"40 8","pages":"Pages 746-752"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Healthcare impact of electroencephalography performed during clinical neurophysiology on-call duty in a third-level hospital\",\"authors\":\"F. Vázquez-Sánchez ,&nbsp;M.C. Lloria-Gil ,&nbsp;B. García-López ,&nbsp;O. Pérez-Gil ,&nbsp;A. Saponaro-González ,&nbsp;E. Rivas-Navas ,&nbsp;A.I. Gómez-Menéndez\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.nrleng.2025.09.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The electroencephalogram (EEG) is a useful tool in the diagnosis of pathologies such as non-convulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) or brain death (BD), cardiac arrest (CA), and status epilepticus (SE) treatment monitoring. In addition, it provides irreplaceable information depending on the time it is performed, as is the case with the diagnosis of epilepsy after a first epileptic seizure (ES) or to differentiate these from non-epileptic paroxysmal events (NEPE). Its usefulness is maintained outside the usual working day, but it is not available in many centers.</div></div><div><h3>Subjects and methods</h3><div>Retrospective observational study based on the clinical history of 86 patients who underwent an on-call EEG (ocEEG) at our hospital during 2020.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>One hundred two records requested by Intensive Care (41.1%), Neurology (37.3%), Pediatrics (17.6%) or other services (4%) were made. Suspected NCSE represented 56.7%, followed by treatment monitoring in EE (21.6%). The ME accounted for only 6.9% of the total. The ocEEG avoided potential iatrogenesis in a 56.3% of cases with therapeutic implications, allowed to treat 27.58% of patients who would have remained without treatment until the conventional EEG. An increase in the level of care was required in only 22,2% of all cases. The ocEEG was anticipated a mean of 31.6 hours to the next conventional EEG that would have been available.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The availability of ocEEG is beneficial in terms of diagnosis, therapy, and hospital management, advancing decision-making and avoiding iatrogenesis. Its availability should become widespread.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94155,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurologia\",\"volume\":\"40 8\",\"pages\":\"Pages 746-752\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173580825000872\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173580825000872","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

脑电图(EEG)是诊断非惊厥性癫痫持续状态(NCSE)或脑死亡(BD)、心脏骤停(CA)和癫痫持续状态(SE)治疗监测等病理的有用工具。此外,根据执行时间的不同,它提供了不可替代的信息,例如首次癫痫发作(ES)后的癫痫诊断或将其与非癫痫性发作事件(NEPE)区分开来。它在正常工作日之外仍然有用,但在许多中心无法使用。对象和方法:基于2020年在我院接受随叫随到EEG (ocEEG)检查的86例患者的临床病史,进行回顾性观察性研究。结果:重症监护科(41.1%)、神经科(37.3%)、儿科(17.6%)及其他科(4%)共查询记录102份。疑似NCSE占56.7%,其次是EE治疗监测(21.6%)。ME仅占总额的6.9%。在56.3%的具有治疗意义的病例中,脑电图避免了潜在的医源性,允许治疗27.58%的患者,这些患者在常规脑电图之前不会接受治疗。只有22.2%的病例需要提高护理水平。预计下一次常规脑电图的平均时间为31.6小时。结论:脑电图的可用性在诊断、治疗和医院管理,促进决策和避免医源性方面都是有益的。它的可用性应该变得广泛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Healthcare impact of electroencephalography performed during clinical neurophysiology on-call duty in a third-level hospital

Introduction

The electroencephalogram (EEG) is a useful tool in the diagnosis of pathologies such as non-convulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) or brain death (BD), cardiac arrest (CA), and status epilepticus (SE) treatment monitoring. In addition, it provides irreplaceable information depending on the time it is performed, as is the case with the diagnosis of epilepsy after a first epileptic seizure (ES) or to differentiate these from non-epileptic paroxysmal events (NEPE). Its usefulness is maintained outside the usual working day, but it is not available in many centers.

Subjects and methods

Retrospective observational study based on the clinical history of 86 patients who underwent an on-call EEG (ocEEG) at our hospital during 2020.

Results

One hundred two records requested by Intensive Care (41.1%), Neurology (37.3%), Pediatrics (17.6%) or other services (4%) were made. Suspected NCSE represented 56.7%, followed by treatment monitoring in EE (21.6%). The ME accounted for only 6.9% of the total. The ocEEG avoided potential iatrogenesis in a 56.3% of cases with therapeutic implications, allowed to treat 27.58% of patients who would have remained without treatment until the conventional EEG. An increase in the level of care was required in only 22,2% of all cases. The ocEEG was anticipated a mean of 31.6 hours to the next conventional EEG that would have been available.

Conclusions

The availability of ocEEG is beneficial in terms of diagnosis, therapy, and hospital management, advancing decision-making and avoiding iatrogenesis. Its availability should become widespread.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
53 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信