Man Ying Lee, Victor Selvarajah Selvanayagam, Teng Keen Khong, Ashril Yusof
{"title":"碳水化合物对男大学生运动员肌肉力量产生的安慰剂效应:错误信息和反馈强化线索的作用。","authors":"Man Ying Lee, Victor Selvarajah Selvanayagam, Teng Keen Khong, Ashril Yusof","doi":"10.1016/j.physbeh.2025.115083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A carbohydrate placebo (CHO-PLA) is a non-metabolic substance guised as carbohydrate. When information about the treatment was not disclosed, CHO-PLA enhanced strength performance through the sweetness cue, which psychologically strengthened participants' belief in its efficacy. However, the effects of CHO-PLA when participants are misinformed that they are consuming actual carbohydrates, and the role of additional cues (visual reinforcement), remain less understood. Active males (<em>n</em> = 45) were assigned to either misinformed (MIS), misinformed with feedback reinforced (MIS+<em>R</em>) or control groups. Isokinetic force production during knee extension and flexion was measured before (pre-test) and after (post-test) CHO-PLA ingestion. A fatiguing task involving a single set of repetitions to failure for knee extension and flexion, respectively was conducted a week later to assess rate of force decline. After CHO-PLA ingestion, the MIS and MIS+<em>R</em> groups showed a 5.7 and 6.9 % increase in knee extension strength, respectively (<em>p</em> < 0.05). For flexion, only the MIS+<em>R</em> group demonstrated improvement (4.9 %; <em>p</em> < 0.05). Additionally, the MIS+<em>R</em> group showed the smallest decline in force (rate constant) during the fatiguing task, which corresponded to the highest total work done. These findings suggest that force production is greater when feedback reinforcement is provided (MIS+<em>R</em>). The findings also indicate that the placebo effect is strongest when all three cues, sweetness, verbal information, and visual feedback are present. In summary, the observed improvements in force production appear to be behavioral; when participants were misinformed and reinforced about the treatment received, their belief in having consumed carbohydrate was strengthened, leading to enhanced strength performance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20201,"journal":{"name":"Physiology & Behavior","volume":"302 ","pages":"Article 115083"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Placebo effect of carbohydrates on muscle force production in male collegiate athletes: The role of misinformation and feedback-reinforced cues\",\"authors\":\"Man Ying Lee, Victor Selvarajah Selvanayagam, Teng Keen Khong, Ashril Yusof\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.physbeh.2025.115083\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>A carbohydrate placebo (CHO-PLA) is a non-metabolic substance guised as carbohydrate. When information about the treatment was not disclosed, CHO-PLA enhanced strength performance through the sweetness cue, which psychologically strengthened participants' belief in its efficacy. However, the effects of CHO-PLA when participants are misinformed that they are consuming actual carbohydrates, and the role of additional cues (visual reinforcement), remain less understood. Active males (<em>n</em> = 45) were assigned to either misinformed (MIS), misinformed with feedback reinforced (MIS+<em>R</em>) or control groups. Isokinetic force production during knee extension and flexion was measured before (pre-test) and after (post-test) CHO-PLA ingestion. A fatiguing task involving a single set of repetitions to failure for knee extension and flexion, respectively was conducted a week later to assess rate of force decline. After CHO-PLA ingestion, the MIS and MIS+<em>R</em> groups showed a 5.7 and 6.9 % increase in knee extension strength, respectively (<em>p</em> < 0.05). For flexion, only the MIS+<em>R</em> group demonstrated improvement (4.9 %; <em>p</em> < 0.05). Additionally, the MIS+<em>R</em> group showed the smallest decline in force (rate constant) during the fatiguing task, which corresponded to the highest total work done. These findings suggest that force production is greater when feedback reinforcement is provided (MIS+<em>R</em>). The findings also indicate that the placebo effect is strongest when all three cues, sweetness, verbal information, and visual feedback are present. In summary, the observed improvements in force production appear to be behavioral; when participants were misinformed and reinforced about the treatment received, their belief in having consumed carbohydrate was strengthened, leading to enhanced strength performance.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20201,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physiology & Behavior\",\"volume\":\"302 \",\"pages\":\"Article 115083\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physiology & Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0031938425002847\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiology & Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0031938425002847","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Placebo effect of carbohydrates on muscle force production in male collegiate athletes: The role of misinformation and feedback-reinforced cues
A carbohydrate placebo (CHO-PLA) is a non-metabolic substance guised as carbohydrate. When information about the treatment was not disclosed, CHO-PLA enhanced strength performance through the sweetness cue, which psychologically strengthened participants' belief in its efficacy. However, the effects of CHO-PLA when participants are misinformed that they are consuming actual carbohydrates, and the role of additional cues (visual reinforcement), remain less understood. Active males (n = 45) were assigned to either misinformed (MIS), misinformed with feedback reinforced (MIS+R) or control groups. Isokinetic force production during knee extension and flexion was measured before (pre-test) and after (post-test) CHO-PLA ingestion. A fatiguing task involving a single set of repetitions to failure for knee extension and flexion, respectively was conducted a week later to assess rate of force decline. After CHO-PLA ingestion, the MIS and MIS+R groups showed a 5.7 and 6.9 % increase in knee extension strength, respectively (p < 0.05). For flexion, only the MIS+R group demonstrated improvement (4.9 %; p < 0.05). Additionally, the MIS+R group showed the smallest decline in force (rate constant) during the fatiguing task, which corresponded to the highest total work done. These findings suggest that force production is greater when feedback reinforcement is provided (MIS+R). The findings also indicate that the placebo effect is strongest when all three cues, sweetness, verbal information, and visual feedback are present. In summary, the observed improvements in force production appear to be behavioral; when participants were misinformed and reinforced about the treatment received, their belief in having consumed carbohydrate was strengthened, leading to enhanced strength performance.
期刊介绍:
Physiology & Behavior is aimed at the causal physiological mechanisms of behavior and its modulation by environmental factors. The journal invites original reports in the broad area of behavioral and cognitive neuroscience, in which at least one variable is physiological and the primary emphasis and theoretical context are behavioral. The range of subjects includes behavioral neuroendocrinology, psychoneuroimmunology, learning and memory, ingestion, social behavior, and studies related to the mechanisms of psychopathology. Contemporary reviews and theoretical articles are welcomed and the Editors invite such proposals from interested authors.