加工肉类健康风险:途径和饮食解决方案。

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Peng Li-Hua, Ousman Bajinka
{"title":"加工肉类健康风险:途径和饮食解决方案。","authors":"Peng Li-Hua, Ousman Bajinka","doi":"10.1016/j.tjnut.2025.08.030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Red and processed meat consumption is extensively linked to chronic disease risk in observational studies, with robust meta-analyses demonstrating significant positive associations for colorectal, breast, endometrial, and lung cancers, type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and all-cause mortality. Dose-response relationships indicate elevated risks even at moderate intakes. Moreover, processed meats consistently show stronger detrimental effects than unprocessed red meats. Biological mechanisms include carcinogen formation, proinflammatory effects, gut microbiome dysbiosis, and impacts on lipid metabolism and insulin resistance. However, evidence exhibits complexities, including inconsistent randomized controlled trial findings on short-term biomarkers, weaker associations for unprocessed red meat in some outcomes, and significant modulation by overall diet, lifestyle, and genetic factors. This review synthesizes epidemiologic evidence on red and processed meat consumption and chronic disease risk, elucidates the multifaceted biological mechanisms underlying these associations, including carcinogenesis, cardiometabolic pathways, and microbiome interactions, and critically evaluates contextual modifiers such as processing methods, including the use of \"natural\" nitrate sources, cooking techniques, and dietary patterns, and lifestyle factors. It also identifies key research gaps and limitations to inform future studies and evidence-based dietary guidance. High processed meat intake is robustly associated with increased risks of multiple chronic diseases and mortality via mechanisms involving mutagenic compounds, heme iron, trimethylamine N-oxide, saturated fats, and gut dysbiosis. Unprocessed red meat shows weaker, less consistent links. Crucially, replacing red/processed meats with plant proteins, poultry, or fish reduces disease risk through beneficial mechanisms. Risk is modified by processing, cooking methods, overall dietary patterns, and physical activity. Public health recommendations should prioritize minimizing processed meat, moderating unprocessed red meat, and emphasizing healthier substitutions within balanced diets. Future research must address causality, mechanistic specificity, population diversity, and integrated health-environmental assessments.</p>","PeriodicalId":16620,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nutrition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Processed Meat Health Risks: Pathways and Dietary Solutions.\",\"authors\":\"Peng Li-Hua, Ousman Bajinka\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tjnut.2025.08.030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Red and processed meat consumption is extensively linked to chronic disease risk in observational studies, with robust meta-analyses demonstrating significant positive associations for colorectal, breast, endometrial, and lung cancers, type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and all-cause mortality. Dose-response relationships indicate elevated risks even at moderate intakes. Moreover, processed meats consistently show stronger detrimental effects than unprocessed red meats. Biological mechanisms include carcinogen formation, proinflammatory effects, gut microbiome dysbiosis, and impacts on lipid metabolism and insulin resistance. However, evidence exhibits complexities, including inconsistent randomized controlled trial findings on short-term biomarkers, weaker associations for unprocessed red meat in some outcomes, and significant modulation by overall diet, lifestyle, and genetic factors. This review synthesizes epidemiologic evidence on red and processed meat consumption and chronic disease risk, elucidates the multifaceted biological mechanisms underlying these associations, including carcinogenesis, cardiometabolic pathways, and microbiome interactions, and critically evaluates contextual modifiers such as processing methods, including the use of \\\"natural\\\" nitrate sources, cooking techniques, and dietary patterns, and lifestyle factors. It also identifies key research gaps and limitations to inform future studies and evidence-based dietary guidance. High processed meat intake is robustly associated with increased risks of multiple chronic diseases and mortality via mechanisms involving mutagenic compounds, heme iron, trimethylamine N-oxide, saturated fats, and gut dysbiosis. Unprocessed red meat shows weaker, less consistent links. Crucially, replacing red/processed meats with plant proteins, poultry, or fish reduces disease risk through beneficial mechanisms. Risk is modified by processing, cooking methods, overall dietary patterns, and physical activity. Public health recommendations should prioritize minimizing processed meat, moderating unprocessed red meat, and emphasizing healthier substitutions within balanced diets. Future research must address causality, mechanistic specificity, population diversity, and integrated health-environmental assessments.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16620,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Nutrition\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjnut.2025.08.030\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjnut.2025.08.030","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在观察性研究中,红肉和加工肉类的消费与慢性疾病风险广泛相关,强有力的荟萃分析显示,红肉和加工肉类的消费与结直肠癌、乳腺癌、子宫内膜癌和肺癌、2型糖尿病(T2DM)、心血管疾病(CVD)和全因死亡率有显著的正相关。剂量-反应关系表明,即使摄入量适中,风险也会升高。此外,与未加工的红肉相比,加工肉类一直显示出更大的有害影响。生物学机制包括致癌物的形成、促炎作用、肠道微生物群失调以及对脂质代谢和胰岛素抵抗的影响。然而,证据显示出复杂性,包括短期生物标志物的随机对照研究结果不一致,未加工红肉在某些结果中的关联较弱,以及总体饮食、生活方式和遗传因素的显著调节。目的:本综述综合了红肉和加工肉消费与慢性疾病风险之间的流行病学证据,阐明了这些关联背后的多方面生物学机制,包括致癌、心脏代谢途径和微生物组相互作用,并批判性地评估了相关修饰因素,如加工方法(包括使用“天然”硝酸盐来源)、烹饪技术、饮食模式和生活方式因素。它还指出了主要的研究差距和局限性,为未来的研究和基于证据的饮食指导提供信息。结论:大量摄入加工肉类与多种慢性疾病和死亡风险增加密切相关,其机制涉及致突变化合物、血红素铁、氧化三甲胺、饱和脂肪和肠道生态失调。未加工的红肉显示出更弱、更不一致的联系。至关重要的是,用植物蛋白、家禽或鱼类代替红肉/加工肉类可以通过有益的机制降低疾病风险。风险会因加工、烹饪方法、整体饮食模式和身体活动而改变。公共卫生建议应优先减少加工肉类,适度食用未加工的红肉,并在均衡饮食中强调更健康的替代品。未来的研究必须解决因果关系、机制特异性、人口多样性和综合健康-环境评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Processed Meat Health Risks: Pathways and Dietary Solutions.

Red and processed meat consumption is extensively linked to chronic disease risk in observational studies, with robust meta-analyses demonstrating significant positive associations for colorectal, breast, endometrial, and lung cancers, type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and all-cause mortality. Dose-response relationships indicate elevated risks even at moderate intakes. Moreover, processed meats consistently show stronger detrimental effects than unprocessed red meats. Biological mechanisms include carcinogen formation, proinflammatory effects, gut microbiome dysbiosis, and impacts on lipid metabolism and insulin resistance. However, evidence exhibits complexities, including inconsistent randomized controlled trial findings on short-term biomarkers, weaker associations for unprocessed red meat in some outcomes, and significant modulation by overall diet, lifestyle, and genetic factors. This review synthesizes epidemiologic evidence on red and processed meat consumption and chronic disease risk, elucidates the multifaceted biological mechanisms underlying these associations, including carcinogenesis, cardiometabolic pathways, and microbiome interactions, and critically evaluates contextual modifiers such as processing methods, including the use of "natural" nitrate sources, cooking techniques, and dietary patterns, and lifestyle factors. It also identifies key research gaps and limitations to inform future studies and evidence-based dietary guidance. High processed meat intake is robustly associated with increased risks of multiple chronic diseases and mortality via mechanisms involving mutagenic compounds, heme iron, trimethylamine N-oxide, saturated fats, and gut dysbiosis. Unprocessed red meat shows weaker, less consistent links. Crucially, replacing red/processed meats with plant proteins, poultry, or fish reduces disease risk through beneficial mechanisms. Risk is modified by processing, cooking methods, overall dietary patterns, and physical activity. Public health recommendations should prioritize minimizing processed meat, moderating unprocessed red meat, and emphasizing healthier substitutions within balanced diets. Future research must address causality, mechanistic specificity, population diversity, and integrated health-environmental assessments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Nutrition
Journal of Nutrition 医学-营养学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
4.80%
发文量
260
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Nutrition (JN/J Nutr) publishes peer-reviewed original research papers covering all aspects of experimental nutrition in humans and other animal species; special articles such as reviews and biographies of prominent nutrition scientists; and issues, opinions, and commentaries on controversial issues in nutrition. Supplements are frequently published to provide extended discussion of topics of special interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信