代际干预及其对主动老龄化的影响:一项系统综述。

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Michele Savino, Lisa De Luca, Annalaura Nocentini, Ersilia Menesini
{"title":"代际干预及其对主动老龄化的影响:一项系统综述。","authors":"Michele Savino, Lisa De Luca, Annalaura Nocentini, Ersilia Menesini","doi":"10.1016/j.inpsyc.2025.100142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aging of the world's population has led to a growing need for innovative strategies to promote active aging and bridge generational divides. Intergenerational Programs (IGPs) that engage young adults (18-30 years) and older adults (65 + years) have demonstrated the potential to improve well-being and reduce ageism. However, the evidence for this pairing of ages is still fragmentary. This review aims to provide a qualitative and systematic synthesis of present IGPs, deepening the main characteristics of their implementations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four databases (Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, ERIC) were systematically searched following PRISMA guidelines. After screening 5554 articles, two independent reviewers assessed full texts, and 26 studies were included and systematically coded for narrative synthesis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study results indicate that IGPs consistently improve mental health, social inclusion, and community cohesion and reduce ageism for both age groups. Most studies (77 %) reported positive outcomes for both generations, while 19 % showed benefits exclusively for older adults. Interventions are diverse, including educational, community, meaningful activity, physical activity, reminiscence, and technology programs. Relational dynamics (61.5 %) and ageism reduction (54 %) emerged as primary outcome focuses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite these strengths, variability in theoretical frameworks and methods limits comparability. These findings highlight the potential of IGPs to promote intergenerational solidarity and suggest that future research should prioritize standardized approach and balanced evaluations to strengthen the evidence base and guide effective practice in an aging society.</p>","PeriodicalId":14368,"journal":{"name":"International psychogeriatrics","volume":" ","pages":"100142"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intergenerational interventions and their impact on active aging: A systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Michele Savino, Lisa De Luca, Annalaura Nocentini, Ersilia Menesini\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.inpsyc.2025.100142\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aging of the world's population has led to a growing need for innovative strategies to promote active aging and bridge generational divides. Intergenerational Programs (IGPs) that engage young adults (18-30 years) and older adults (65 + years) have demonstrated the potential to improve well-being and reduce ageism. However, the evidence for this pairing of ages is still fragmentary. This review aims to provide a qualitative and systematic synthesis of present IGPs, deepening the main characteristics of their implementations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four databases (Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, ERIC) were systematically searched following PRISMA guidelines. After screening 5554 articles, two independent reviewers assessed full texts, and 26 studies were included and systematically coded for narrative synthesis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study results indicate that IGPs consistently improve mental health, social inclusion, and community cohesion and reduce ageism for both age groups. Most studies (77 %) reported positive outcomes for both generations, while 19 % showed benefits exclusively for older adults. Interventions are diverse, including educational, community, meaningful activity, physical activity, reminiscence, and technology programs. Relational dynamics (61.5 %) and ageism reduction (54 %) emerged as primary outcome focuses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite these strengths, variability in theoretical frameworks and methods limits comparability. These findings highlight the potential of IGPs to promote intergenerational solidarity and suggest that future research should prioritize standardized approach and balanced evaluations to strengthen the evidence base and guide effective practice in an aging society.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14368,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International psychogeriatrics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"100142\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International psychogeriatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inpsyc.2025.100142\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International psychogeriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inpsyc.2025.100142","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:世界人口老龄化导致越来越需要创新战略来促进积极老龄化和弥合代沟。年轻人(18-30岁)和老年人(65岁 以上)参与的代际计划(IGPs)已经证明了改善福祉和减少年龄歧视的潜力。然而,这种年龄配对的证据仍然是零碎的。本综述旨在对现有IGPs进行定性和系统的综合,深化其实施的主要特点。方法:按照PRISMA指南系统检索4个数据库(Scopus、Web of Science、PubMed、ERIC)。在筛选了5554篇文章后,两名独立审稿人对全文进行了评估,并纳入了26项研究,并对其进行了系统编码以进行叙事综合。结果:研究结果表明,IGPs持续改善两个年龄组的心理健康、社会包容和社区凝聚力,并减少年龄歧视。大多数研究(77 %)报告了两代人的积极结果,而19 %显示仅对老年人有益。干预措施多种多样,包括教育、社区、有意义的活动、体育活动、回忆和技术项目。关系动力学(61.5 %)和减少年龄歧视(54 %)成为主要结局重点。结论:尽管有这些优势,理论框架和方法的可变性限制了可比性。这些发现强调了IGPs促进代际团结的潜力,并建议未来的研究应优先考虑标准化方法和平衡评估,以加强证据基础并指导老龄化社会的有效实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Intergenerational interventions and their impact on active aging: A systematic review.

Background: The aging of the world's population has led to a growing need for innovative strategies to promote active aging and bridge generational divides. Intergenerational Programs (IGPs) that engage young adults (18-30 years) and older adults (65 + years) have demonstrated the potential to improve well-being and reduce ageism. However, the evidence for this pairing of ages is still fragmentary. This review aims to provide a qualitative and systematic synthesis of present IGPs, deepening the main characteristics of their implementations.

Methods: Four databases (Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, ERIC) were systematically searched following PRISMA guidelines. After screening 5554 articles, two independent reviewers assessed full texts, and 26 studies were included and systematically coded for narrative synthesis.

Results: The study results indicate that IGPs consistently improve mental health, social inclusion, and community cohesion and reduce ageism for both age groups. Most studies (77 %) reported positive outcomes for both generations, while 19 % showed benefits exclusively for older adults. Interventions are diverse, including educational, community, meaningful activity, physical activity, reminiscence, and technology programs. Relational dynamics (61.5 %) and ageism reduction (54 %) emerged as primary outcome focuses.

Conclusions: Despite these strengths, variability in theoretical frameworks and methods limits comparability. These findings highlight the potential of IGPs to promote intergenerational solidarity and suggest that future research should prioritize standardized approach and balanced evaluations to strengthen the evidence base and guide effective practice in an aging society.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International psychogeriatrics
International psychogeriatrics 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
8.60%
发文量
217
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: A highly respected, multidisciplinary journal, International Psychogeriatrics publishes high quality original research papers in the field of psychogeriatrics. The journal aims to be the leading peer reviewed journal dealing with all aspects of the mental health of older people throughout the world. Circulated to over 1,000 members of the International Psychogeriatric Association, International Psychogeriatrics also features important editorials, provocative debates, literature reviews, book reviews and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信