浮丝辅助器械回收——预防导管相关性冠状动脉损伤的新技术。

IF 1.8 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Atit A Gawalkar, Rajesh Vijayvergiya, Pragya Karki
{"title":"浮丝辅助器械回收——预防导管相关性冠状动脉损伤的新技术。","authors":"Atit A Gawalkar, Rajesh Vijayvergiya, Pragya Karki","doi":"10.1016/j.ihj.2025.08.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>An inward force is experienced by the guide catheter during device retrieval resulting in potential risk of deep engagement into the ostio-proximal coronary segment. This undesired movement can result in coronary injury. There is no systematic data or reports of techniques to prevent such inadvertent guide movement during difficult retrieval of devices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In 25 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, where the conventional methods of guide stabilization failed to prevent deep engagement of guide catheter during device retrieval we used 'floating aortic wire' technique and reattempted retrieval. The primary endpoint was the successful retrieval of the device without deep engagement of the guide.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Successful retrieval was seen without deep engagement of guide in 23(92 %) patients. Left anterior descending(n = 15, 60 %) artery was the most common coronary artery. The XB guide(n = 14, 70 %) was the most commonly used guide for left coronary intervention while Judgkins right and Amplatz left were used most commonly for right coronary intervention. Stent balloon(n = 15, 60 %) was the most common device which required using floating aortic wire for retrieval. Other devices were jailed wire(n = 5,20 %), non-compliant balloon(n = 4,16 %) and cutting balloon(n = 1,4 %). Intravascular ultrasound did not show any guide related vessel injury(dissection or intramural hematoma) in any cases. The floating aortic wire failed to prevent deep engagement in two patients because of longer segment of jailed wire and long stent balloon in distal right coronary artery.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Floating aortic wire assisted retrieval of coronary devices is a simple, reliable and safe technique that prevents deep guide engagement during difficult retrieval.</p>","PeriodicalId":13384,"journal":{"name":"Indian heart journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Floating wire assisted device retrieval-a novel technique for prevention of guide-related coronary injury.\",\"authors\":\"Atit A Gawalkar, Rajesh Vijayvergiya, Pragya Karki\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ihj.2025.08.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>An inward force is experienced by the guide catheter during device retrieval resulting in potential risk of deep engagement into the ostio-proximal coronary segment. This undesired movement can result in coronary injury. There is no systematic data or reports of techniques to prevent such inadvertent guide movement during difficult retrieval of devices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In 25 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, where the conventional methods of guide stabilization failed to prevent deep engagement of guide catheter during device retrieval we used 'floating aortic wire' technique and reattempted retrieval. The primary endpoint was the successful retrieval of the device without deep engagement of the guide.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Successful retrieval was seen without deep engagement of guide in 23(92 %) patients. Left anterior descending(n = 15, 60 %) artery was the most common coronary artery. The XB guide(n = 14, 70 %) was the most commonly used guide for left coronary intervention while Judgkins right and Amplatz left were used most commonly for right coronary intervention. Stent balloon(n = 15, 60 %) was the most common device which required using floating aortic wire for retrieval. Other devices were jailed wire(n = 5,20 %), non-compliant balloon(n = 4,16 %) and cutting balloon(n = 1,4 %). Intravascular ultrasound did not show any guide related vessel injury(dissection or intramural hematoma) in any cases. The floating aortic wire failed to prevent deep engagement in two patients because of longer segment of jailed wire and long stent balloon in distal right coronary artery.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Floating aortic wire assisted retrieval of coronary devices is a simple, reliable and safe technique that prevents deep guide engagement during difficult retrieval.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian heart journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian heart journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ihj.2025.08.005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian heart journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ihj.2025.08.005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在器械取出过程中,引导导管会受到向内的力,导致潜在的深度接触到口近端冠状动脉段的风险。这种不希望的运动可导致冠状动脉损伤。没有系统的数据或技术报告,以防止这种无意的引导运动在困难的检索装置。方法:在25例接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的患者中,传统的导管稳定方法无法防止导管在器械取出过程中深度接触,我们使用“漂浮主动脉线”技术并再次尝试取出。主要终点是成功取出设备,而没有深度接触引导器。结果:23例(92 %)患者在没有深度接触引导的情况下成功取出。左前降支(n = 15,60 %)是最常见的冠状动脉。XB导片(n = 14,70 %)是左冠状动脉介入治疗最常用的导片,而右冠状动脉介入治疗最常用的导片是judkins right和Amplatz left。球囊支架(n = 15,60 %)是最常见的需要使用漂浮主动脉线进行取出的装置。其他设备入狱线(n = 5,20 %),不一致的气球(n = 4,16 %)和削减气球(n = 1,4 %)。在所有病例中,血管内超声未显示任何导管相关的血管损伤(夹层或壁内血肿)。由于右冠状动脉远端有较长的囚禁段和较长的支架球囊,两例患者的漂浮主动脉丝未能阻止深度介入。结论:漂浮主动脉线辅助冠状动脉装置的取出是一种简单、可靠、安全的技术,可避免在困难的取出过程中深度引导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Floating wire assisted device retrieval-a novel technique for prevention of guide-related coronary injury.

Background: An inward force is experienced by the guide catheter during device retrieval resulting in potential risk of deep engagement into the ostio-proximal coronary segment. This undesired movement can result in coronary injury. There is no systematic data or reports of techniques to prevent such inadvertent guide movement during difficult retrieval of devices.

Methods: In 25 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, where the conventional methods of guide stabilization failed to prevent deep engagement of guide catheter during device retrieval we used 'floating aortic wire' technique and reattempted retrieval. The primary endpoint was the successful retrieval of the device without deep engagement of the guide.

Results: Successful retrieval was seen without deep engagement of guide in 23(92 %) patients. Left anterior descending(n = 15, 60 %) artery was the most common coronary artery. The XB guide(n = 14, 70 %) was the most commonly used guide for left coronary intervention while Judgkins right and Amplatz left were used most commonly for right coronary intervention. Stent balloon(n = 15, 60 %) was the most common device which required using floating aortic wire for retrieval. Other devices were jailed wire(n = 5,20 %), non-compliant balloon(n = 4,16 %) and cutting balloon(n = 1,4 %). Intravascular ultrasound did not show any guide related vessel injury(dissection or intramural hematoma) in any cases. The floating aortic wire failed to prevent deep engagement in two patients because of longer segment of jailed wire and long stent balloon in distal right coronary artery.

Conclusion: Floating aortic wire assisted retrieval of coronary devices is a simple, reliable and safe technique that prevents deep guide engagement during difficult retrieval.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Indian heart journal
Indian heart journal CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
82
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: Indian Heart Journal (IHJ) is the official peer-reviewed open access journal of Cardiological Society of India and accepts articles for publication from across the globe. The journal aims to promote high quality research and serve as a platform for dissemination of scientific information in cardiology with particular focus on South Asia. The journal aims to publish cutting edge research in the field of clinical as well as non-clinical cardiology - including cardiovascular medicine and surgery. Some of the topics covered are Heart Failure, Coronary Artery Disease, Hypertension, Interventional Cardiology, Cardiac Surgery, Valvular Heart Disease, Pulmonary Hypertension and Infective Endocarditis. IHJ open access invites original research articles, research briefs, perspective, case reports, case vignette, cardiovascular images, cardiovascular graphics, research letters, correspondence, reader forum, and interesting photographs, for publication. IHJ open access also publishes theme-based special issues and abstracts of papers presented at the annual conference of the Cardiological Society of India.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信