甲硝唑加入妇科恶性肿瘤子宫切除术围手术期预防的标准护理。

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Megan Gorman, Ariel Kredentser, Ioanna Agatha Katehis, Alejandro Alvarez, Annalese Williams, Jessica Silvestri, Antoinette Sakaris, Samantha Gobioff, Jeannine Villella, Jill S Whyte, Gary L Goldberg, Marina Frimer
{"title":"甲硝唑加入妇科恶性肿瘤子宫切除术围手术期预防的标准护理。","authors":"Megan Gorman, Ariel Kredentser, Ioanna Agatha Katehis, Alejandro Alvarez, Annalese Williams, Jessica Silvestri, Antoinette Sakaris, Samantha Gobioff, Jeannine Villella, Jill S Whyte, Gary L Goldberg, Marina Frimer","doi":"10.1016/j.ijgc.2025.102036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the combination of cefazolin or a second-generation cephalosporin plus metronidazole is associated with a reduced risk of surgical site infection in women undergoing hysterectomy for gynecologic cancer compared to using cefazolin or a second-generation cephalosporin alone.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent hysterectomy at a single institution between January 2020 and June 2022. The primary outcome was surgical site infection. All patients who underwent abdominal, robotic-assisted, or laparoscopic hysterectomy for presumed malignancy and received either a first- or second-generation cephalosporin with or without metronidazole, or gentamicin with clindamycin, were included in the analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1055 patients were identified who underwent hysterectomy for malignancy during the study period across 4 hospital sites within our system. The overall rate of any surgical site infection was 3.2% (N = 34). Surgical site infection was found to be independently associated with diabetes (p < .01), smoking (p < .01), and antibiotic regimen (p = .04). Surgical site infection rates were 4.3% among patients treated with standard-of-care antibiotics and 2.1% with the addition of metronidazole. However, after adjusting for covariates using a mixed-effects binary logistic regression, the addition of metronidazole to standard-of-care antibiotics was not statistically significantly associated with a reduced risk of surgical site infection (OR 0.5, 95% CI 0.3 to 1.1).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While there was evidence supporting an independent association between antibiotic regimen and surgical site infection rate, after adjusting for open incision, smoking status, and diabetes, there was no statistical difference in infection rates with the addition of metronidazole. Future studies with larger sample sizes are warranted to better elucidate these potentially important clinical effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":14097,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer","volume":"35 10","pages":"102036"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Addition of metronidazole to standard-of-care perioperative prophylaxis at the time of hysterectomy for gynecologic malignancies.\",\"authors\":\"Megan Gorman, Ariel Kredentser, Ioanna Agatha Katehis, Alejandro Alvarez, Annalese Williams, Jessica Silvestri, Antoinette Sakaris, Samantha Gobioff, Jeannine Villella, Jill S Whyte, Gary L Goldberg, Marina Frimer\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijgc.2025.102036\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the combination of cefazolin or a second-generation cephalosporin plus metronidazole is associated with a reduced risk of surgical site infection in women undergoing hysterectomy for gynecologic cancer compared to using cefazolin or a second-generation cephalosporin alone.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent hysterectomy at a single institution between January 2020 and June 2022. The primary outcome was surgical site infection. All patients who underwent abdominal, robotic-assisted, or laparoscopic hysterectomy for presumed malignancy and received either a first- or second-generation cephalosporin with or without metronidazole, or gentamicin with clindamycin, were included in the analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1055 patients were identified who underwent hysterectomy for malignancy during the study period across 4 hospital sites within our system. The overall rate of any surgical site infection was 3.2% (N = 34). Surgical site infection was found to be independently associated with diabetes (p < .01), smoking (p < .01), and antibiotic regimen (p = .04). Surgical site infection rates were 4.3% among patients treated with standard-of-care antibiotics and 2.1% with the addition of metronidazole. However, after adjusting for covariates using a mixed-effects binary logistic regression, the addition of metronidazole to standard-of-care antibiotics was not statistically significantly associated with a reduced risk of surgical site infection (OR 0.5, 95% CI 0.3 to 1.1).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While there was evidence supporting an independent association between antibiotic regimen and surgical site infection rate, after adjusting for open incision, smoking status, and diabetes, there was no statistical difference in infection rates with the addition of metronidazole. Future studies with larger sample sizes are warranted to better elucidate these potentially important clinical effects.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14097,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer\",\"volume\":\"35 10\",\"pages\":\"102036\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgc.2025.102036\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgc.2025.102036","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是评估与单独使用头孢唑林或二代头孢菌素联合甲硝唑相比,头孢唑林或二代头孢菌素联合甲硝唑是否与妇科肿瘤子宫切除术妇女手术部位感染风险降低相关。方法:这是一项回顾性队列研究,纳入了2020年1月至2022年6月在一家机构接受子宫切除术的患者。主要结局为手术部位感染。所有因推测为恶性肿瘤而接受腹部、机器人辅助或腹腔镜子宫切除术,并接受第一代或第二代头孢菌素(含或不含甲硝唑)或庆大霉素(含克林霉素)治疗的患者均被纳入分析。结果:在研究期间,共有1055名患者在我们系统内的4家医院接受了恶性子宫切除术。手术部位感染的总发生率为3.2% (N = 34)。手术部位感染与糖尿病(p < 0.01)、吸烟(p < 0.01)和抗生素治疗(p = 0.04)独立相关。使用标准护理抗生素治疗的患者手术部位感染率为4.3%,使用甲硝唑治疗的患者手术部位感染率为2.1%。然而,在使用混合效应二元logistic回归调整协变量后,标准护理抗生素中添加甲硝唑与手术部位感染风险降低没有统计学显著相关(OR 0.5, 95% CI 0.3至1.1)。结论:虽然有证据支持抗生素方案与手术部位感染率之间的独立关联,但在调整开放切口、吸烟状况和糖尿病后,添加甲硝唑的感染率没有统计学差异。未来需要更大样本量的研究来更好地阐明这些潜在的重要临床效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Addition of metronidazole to standard-of-care perioperative prophylaxis at the time of hysterectomy for gynecologic malignancies.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the combination of cefazolin or a second-generation cephalosporin plus metronidazole is associated with a reduced risk of surgical site infection in women undergoing hysterectomy for gynecologic cancer compared to using cefazolin or a second-generation cephalosporin alone.

Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent hysterectomy at a single institution between January 2020 and June 2022. The primary outcome was surgical site infection. All patients who underwent abdominal, robotic-assisted, or laparoscopic hysterectomy for presumed malignancy and received either a first- or second-generation cephalosporin with or without metronidazole, or gentamicin with clindamycin, were included in the analysis.

Results: A total of 1055 patients were identified who underwent hysterectomy for malignancy during the study period across 4 hospital sites within our system. The overall rate of any surgical site infection was 3.2% (N = 34). Surgical site infection was found to be independently associated with diabetes (p < .01), smoking (p < .01), and antibiotic regimen (p = .04). Surgical site infection rates were 4.3% among patients treated with standard-of-care antibiotics and 2.1% with the addition of metronidazole. However, after adjusting for covariates using a mixed-effects binary logistic regression, the addition of metronidazole to standard-of-care antibiotics was not statistically significantly associated with a reduced risk of surgical site infection (OR 0.5, 95% CI 0.3 to 1.1).

Conclusions: While there was evidence supporting an independent association between antibiotic regimen and surgical site infection rate, after adjusting for open incision, smoking status, and diabetes, there was no statistical difference in infection rates with the addition of metronidazole. Future studies with larger sample sizes are warranted to better elucidate these potentially important clinical effects.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
10.40%
发文量
280
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, the official journal of the International Gynecologic Cancer Society and the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology, is the primary educational and informational publication for topics relevant to detection, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of gynecologic malignancies. IJGC emphasizes a multidisciplinary approach, and includes original research, reviews, and video articles. The audience consists of gynecologists, medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, radiologists, pathologists, and research scientists with a special interest in gynecological oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信