眨眼的刹车:运动抑制和运动冲动的脑电图前因。

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Antonio Ivano Triggiani, Lucrezia Liuzzi, Kaya Scheman, Mark Hallett
{"title":"眨眼的刹车:运动抑制和运动冲动的脑电图前因。","authors":"Antonio Ivano Triggiani, Lucrezia Liuzzi, Kaya Scheman, Mark Hallett","doi":"10.1016/j.clinph.2025.2110997","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare brain activity before voluntary movement and before the same movement when it was released from suppression. This study examined the Bereitschaftspotential (BP) and beta band event-related desynchronization (bERD) during active blink suppression, contrasting these with voluntary blinking, where these EEG correlates of motor preparation are well-established.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifteen healthy adults performed voluntary blink and blink suppression-release tasks with EEG recording. Time-locked analyses focused on BP and bERD for each condition.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Voluntary blinks showed a robust negative BP, which was markedly attenuated after a period of active suppression. Overall bERD did not significantly differ, but low-frequency bERD mirrored BP activity, while high-frequency bERD showed typical desynchronization.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The dissociation between BP and bERD suggests distinct neurophysiological mechanisms related to the voluntary control and urge to move in fundamental actions like blinks, involving active suppression of typical motor preparation rather than just absent activation. This insight into the neural control of suppressing even basic motor acts may be relevant to understanding conditions characterized by difficulties in action suppression, such as tic disorders.</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>This study offers novel insights into the neural correlates of suppressing seemingly unavoidable physiological responses, enhancing our understanding of inhibitory control and potentially impacting the study of conditions with action suppression deficits.</p>","PeriodicalId":10671,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neurophysiology","volume":" ","pages":"2110997"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A brake on the blink: EEG antecedents of movement suppression and urge to move.\",\"authors\":\"Antonio Ivano Triggiani, Lucrezia Liuzzi, Kaya Scheman, Mark Hallett\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clinph.2025.2110997\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare brain activity before voluntary movement and before the same movement when it was released from suppression. This study examined the Bereitschaftspotential (BP) and beta band event-related desynchronization (bERD) during active blink suppression, contrasting these with voluntary blinking, where these EEG correlates of motor preparation are well-established.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifteen healthy adults performed voluntary blink and blink suppression-release tasks with EEG recording. Time-locked analyses focused on BP and bERD for each condition.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Voluntary blinks showed a robust negative BP, which was markedly attenuated after a period of active suppression. Overall bERD did not significantly differ, but low-frequency bERD mirrored BP activity, while high-frequency bERD showed typical desynchronization.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The dissociation between BP and bERD suggests distinct neurophysiological mechanisms related to the voluntary control and urge to move in fundamental actions like blinks, involving active suppression of typical motor preparation rather than just absent activation. This insight into the neural control of suppressing even basic motor acts may be relevant to understanding conditions characterized by difficulties in action suppression, such as tic disorders.</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>This study offers novel insights into the neural correlates of suppressing seemingly unavoidable physiological responses, enhancing our understanding of inhibitory control and potentially impacting the study of conditions with action suppression deficits.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10671,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Neurophysiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2110997\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Neurophysiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2025.2110997\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2025.2110997","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较自主运动前与自主运动解除抑制前的脑活动。本研究检查了主动眨眼抑制期间的静止电位(BP)和β频带事件相关失同步(bERD),并将其与自愿眨眼进行对比,其中这些运动准备的脑电图相关性已经得到证实。方法:15名健康成人进行自主眨眼和眨眼抑制释放任务,并进行脑电图记录。时间锁定分析侧重于每种情况下的BP和bERD。结果:自主眨眼表现出强烈的负BP,经过一段时间的主动抑制后明显减弱。总体bERD差异不显著,但低频bERD反映了BP活动,而高频bERD表现出典型的不同步。结论:BP和bERD之间的分离表明,在眨眼等基本动作中,与自主控制和运动冲动相关的不同神经生理机制涉及典型运动准备的主动抑制,而不仅仅是缺失激活。这种对抑制基本运动行为的神经控制的洞察可能与理解以动作抑制困难为特征的条件有关,例如抽动障碍。意义:本研究为抑制看似不可避免的生理反应的神经相关性提供了新的见解,增强了我们对抑制控制的理解,并可能影响动作抑制缺陷条件的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A brake on the blink: EEG antecedents of movement suppression and urge to move.

Objective: To compare brain activity before voluntary movement and before the same movement when it was released from suppression. This study examined the Bereitschaftspotential (BP) and beta band event-related desynchronization (bERD) during active blink suppression, contrasting these with voluntary blinking, where these EEG correlates of motor preparation are well-established.

Methods: Fifteen healthy adults performed voluntary blink and blink suppression-release tasks with EEG recording. Time-locked analyses focused on BP and bERD for each condition.

Results: Voluntary blinks showed a robust negative BP, which was markedly attenuated after a period of active suppression. Overall bERD did not significantly differ, but low-frequency bERD mirrored BP activity, while high-frequency bERD showed typical desynchronization.

Conclusion: The dissociation between BP and bERD suggests distinct neurophysiological mechanisms related to the voluntary control and urge to move in fundamental actions like blinks, involving active suppression of typical motor preparation rather than just absent activation. This insight into the neural control of suppressing even basic motor acts may be relevant to understanding conditions characterized by difficulties in action suppression, such as tic disorders.

Significance: This study offers novel insights into the neural correlates of suppressing seemingly unavoidable physiological responses, enhancing our understanding of inhibitory control and potentially impacting the study of conditions with action suppression deficits.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Neurophysiology
Clinical Neurophysiology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
6.40%
发文量
932
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: As of January 1999, The journal Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, and its two sections Electromyography and Motor Control and Evoked Potentials have amalgamated to become this journal - Clinical Neurophysiology. Clinical Neurophysiology is the official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology, the Brazilian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, the Czech Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, the Italian Clinical Neurophysiology Society and the International Society of Intraoperative Neurophysiology.The journal is dedicated to fostering research and disseminating information on all aspects of both normal and abnormal functioning of the nervous system. The key aim of the publication is to disseminate scholarly reports on the pathophysiology underlying diseases of the central and peripheral nervous system of human patients. Clinical trials that use neurophysiological measures to document change are encouraged, as are manuscripts reporting data on integrated neuroimaging of central nervous function including, but not limited to, functional MRI, MEG, EEG, PET and other neuroimaging modalities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信