Antonio Ivano Triggiani, Lucrezia Liuzzi, Kaya Scheman, Mark Hallett
{"title":"眨眼的刹车:运动抑制和运动冲动的脑电图前因。","authors":"Antonio Ivano Triggiani, Lucrezia Liuzzi, Kaya Scheman, Mark Hallett","doi":"10.1016/j.clinph.2025.2110997","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare brain activity before voluntary movement and before the same movement when it was released from suppression. This study examined the Bereitschaftspotential (BP) and beta band event-related desynchronization (bERD) during active blink suppression, contrasting these with voluntary blinking, where these EEG correlates of motor preparation are well-established.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifteen healthy adults performed voluntary blink and blink suppression-release tasks with EEG recording. Time-locked analyses focused on BP and bERD for each condition.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Voluntary blinks showed a robust negative BP, which was markedly attenuated after a period of active suppression. Overall bERD did not significantly differ, but low-frequency bERD mirrored BP activity, while high-frequency bERD showed typical desynchronization.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The dissociation between BP and bERD suggests distinct neurophysiological mechanisms related to the voluntary control and urge to move in fundamental actions like blinks, involving active suppression of typical motor preparation rather than just absent activation. This insight into the neural control of suppressing even basic motor acts may be relevant to understanding conditions characterized by difficulties in action suppression, such as tic disorders.</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>This study offers novel insights into the neural correlates of suppressing seemingly unavoidable physiological responses, enhancing our understanding of inhibitory control and potentially impacting the study of conditions with action suppression deficits.</p>","PeriodicalId":10671,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neurophysiology","volume":" ","pages":"2110997"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A brake on the blink: EEG antecedents of movement suppression and urge to move.\",\"authors\":\"Antonio Ivano Triggiani, Lucrezia Liuzzi, Kaya Scheman, Mark Hallett\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clinph.2025.2110997\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare brain activity before voluntary movement and before the same movement when it was released from suppression. This study examined the Bereitschaftspotential (BP) and beta band event-related desynchronization (bERD) during active blink suppression, contrasting these with voluntary blinking, where these EEG correlates of motor preparation are well-established.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifteen healthy adults performed voluntary blink and blink suppression-release tasks with EEG recording. Time-locked analyses focused on BP and bERD for each condition.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Voluntary blinks showed a robust negative BP, which was markedly attenuated after a period of active suppression. Overall bERD did not significantly differ, but low-frequency bERD mirrored BP activity, while high-frequency bERD showed typical desynchronization.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The dissociation between BP and bERD suggests distinct neurophysiological mechanisms related to the voluntary control and urge to move in fundamental actions like blinks, involving active suppression of typical motor preparation rather than just absent activation. This insight into the neural control of suppressing even basic motor acts may be relevant to understanding conditions characterized by difficulties in action suppression, such as tic disorders.</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>This study offers novel insights into the neural correlates of suppressing seemingly unavoidable physiological responses, enhancing our understanding of inhibitory control and potentially impacting the study of conditions with action suppression deficits.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10671,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Neurophysiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2110997\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Neurophysiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2025.2110997\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2025.2110997","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
A brake on the blink: EEG antecedents of movement suppression and urge to move.
Objective: To compare brain activity before voluntary movement and before the same movement when it was released from suppression. This study examined the Bereitschaftspotential (BP) and beta band event-related desynchronization (bERD) during active blink suppression, contrasting these with voluntary blinking, where these EEG correlates of motor preparation are well-established.
Methods: Fifteen healthy adults performed voluntary blink and blink suppression-release tasks with EEG recording. Time-locked analyses focused on BP and bERD for each condition.
Results: Voluntary blinks showed a robust negative BP, which was markedly attenuated after a period of active suppression. Overall bERD did not significantly differ, but low-frequency bERD mirrored BP activity, while high-frequency bERD showed typical desynchronization.
Conclusion: The dissociation between BP and bERD suggests distinct neurophysiological mechanisms related to the voluntary control and urge to move in fundamental actions like blinks, involving active suppression of typical motor preparation rather than just absent activation. This insight into the neural control of suppressing even basic motor acts may be relevant to understanding conditions characterized by difficulties in action suppression, such as tic disorders.
Significance: This study offers novel insights into the neural correlates of suppressing seemingly unavoidable physiological responses, enhancing our understanding of inhibitory control and potentially impacting the study of conditions with action suppression deficits.
期刊介绍:
As of January 1999, The journal Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, and its two sections Electromyography and Motor Control and Evoked Potentials have amalgamated to become this journal - Clinical Neurophysiology.
Clinical Neurophysiology is the official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology, the Brazilian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, the Czech Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, the Italian Clinical Neurophysiology Society and the International Society of Intraoperative Neurophysiology.The journal is dedicated to fostering research and disseminating information on all aspects of both normal and abnormal functioning of the nervous system. The key aim of the publication is to disseminate scholarly reports on the pathophysiology underlying diseases of the central and peripheral nervous system of human patients. Clinical trials that use neurophysiological measures to document change are encouraged, as are manuscripts reporting data on integrated neuroimaging of central nervous function including, but not limited to, functional MRI, MEG, EEG, PET and other neuroimaging modalities.