{"title":"颈部剥离或放疗后头颈部重建的血管选择","authors":"Yasufumi Makiuchi, Daisuke Kageyama, Masaki Arikawa, Satoshi Akazawa","doi":"10.1002/micr.70116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Free flap transfer is an essential technique for head and neck reconstruction after oncological ablative resection. Selection of recipient vessels can be challenging in patients with a history of neck dissection and/or radiotherapy. We analyzed outcomes with regard to recipient vessel selection and flap failure, referring to patients' histories of radiotherapy and/or neck dissection.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Records of 671 patients who had undergone head and neck reconstruction in our institution from April 2018 to March 2024 were retrospectively reviewed. We divided patients into four groups based on their treatment history: radiotherapy alone (<i>RT</i>, <i>n</i> = 82), neck dissection alone (<i>ND</i>, <i>n</i> = 43), both radiotherapy and neck dissection (<i>NDRT</i>, <i>n</i> = 39), and intact neck with no history of radiotherapy or neck dissection (<i>IN</i>, <i>n</i> = 488). We collected data on flap types, defect areas, selected recipient vessels, and the occurrence of flap failure. We also assessed the risk factors for flap failure.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>In <i>Group RT</i>, 66 of 84 (79%) recipient vessels were located within irradiated areas. In contrast, in <i>Group ND</i>, 37 of 45 (82%) recipient vessels were outside the dissected areas. No significant association was observed between overall flap failure and variables we assessed. However, our additional flap failure analysis by arterial or venous factors showed an association with the patients' history of radiation treatment (<i>p</i> < 0.05) and in cases where anastomosed vessels were actually located within irradiated areas (<i>p</i> < 0.05).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>In patients with previous radiotherapy history, recipient vessels even within irradiated areas can often be successfully used as recipient vessels. However, after undergoing irradiation treatment, the risk of venous-related flap failure may be higher compared with the non-irradiated area; thus, it necessitates careful consideration during reconstruction.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":18600,"journal":{"name":"Microsurgery","volume":"45 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Vessel Selection in Head and Neck Reconstruction After Neck Dissection or Radiotherapy\",\"authors\":\"Yasufumi Makiuchi, Daisuke Kageyama, Masaki Arikawa, Satoshi Akazawa\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/micr.70116\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Free flap transfer is an essential technique for head and neck reconstruction after oncological ablative resection. Selection of recipient vessels can be challenging in patients with a history of neck dissection and/or radiotherapy. We analyzed outcomes with regard to recipient vessel selection and flap failure, referring to patients' histories of radiotherapy and/or neck dissection.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Records of 671 patients who had undergone head and neck reconstruction in our institution from April 2018 to March 2024 were retrospectively reviewed. We divided patients into four groups based on their treatment history: radiotherapy alone (<i>RT</i>, <i>n</i> = 82), neck dissection alone (<i>ND</i>, <i>n</i> = 43), both radiotherapy and neck dissection (<i>NDRT</i>, <i>n</i> = 39), and intact neck with no history of radiotherapy or neck dissection (<i>IN</i>, <i>n</i> = 488). We collected data on flap types, defect areas, selected recipient vessels, and the occurrence of flap failure. We also assessed the risk factors for flap failure.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>In <i>Group RT</i>, 66 of 84 (79%) recipient vessels were located within irradiated areas. In contrast, in <i>Group ND</i>, 37 of 45 (82%) recipient vessels were outside the dissected areas. No significant association was observed between overall flap failure and variables we assessed. However, our additional flap failure analysis by arterial or venous factors showed an association with the patients' history of radiation treatment (<i>p</i> < 0.05) and in cases where anastomosed vessels were actually located within irradiated areas (<i>p</i> < 0.05).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>In patients with previous radiotherapy history, recipient vessels even within irradiated areas can often be successfully used as recipient vessels. However, after undergoing irradiation treatment, the risk of venous-related flap failure may be higher compared with the non-irradiated area; thus, it necessitates careful consideration during reconstruction.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18600,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Microsurgery\",\"volume\":\"45 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Microsurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/micr.70116\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microsurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/micr.70116","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景游离皮瓣移植是肿瘤消融切除后头颈部重建的重要技术。对于有颈部剥离和/或放疗史的患者,选择受体血管可能具有挑战性。我们分析了有关受体血管选择和皮瓣失败的结果,参考了患者的放疗史和/或颈部剥离。方法回顾性分析我院2018年4月至2024年3月671例头颈部重建术患者的临床资料。我们根据患者的治疗史将患者分为四组:单纯放疗组(RT, n = 82)、单纯颈部清扫组(ND, n = 43)、同时放疗和颈部清扫组(NDRT, n = 39)、完整颈部且无放疗或颈部清扫史(IN, n = 488)。我们收集了皮瓣类型、缺损区域、选择的受体血管和皮瓣失败的发生等数据。我们还评估了皮瓣失败的危险因素。结果RT组84只受体血管中有66只(79%)位于辐照区。相反,在ND组,45条受体血管中有37条(82%)位于解剖区之外。我们所评估的变量与皮瓣整体失效之间没有明显的关联。然而,我们通过动脉或静脉因素进行的额外皮瓣失效分析显示,与患者的放射治疗史(p < 0.05)以及吻合血管实际上位于辐照区域的病例(p < 0.05)有关。结论既往有放疗史的患者,即使在放疗区域内,也可成功使用受体血管。然而,在接受辐照治疗后,静脉相关皮瓣失效的风险可能高于未辐照区;因此,在重建过程中需要仔细考虑。
Vessel Selection in Head and Neck Reconstruction After Neck Dissection or Radiotherapy
Background
Free flap transfer is an essential technique for head and neck reconstruction after oncological ablative resection. Selection of recipient vessels can be challenging in patients with a history of neck dissection and/or radiotherapy. We analyzed outcomes with regard to recipient vessel selection and flap failure, referring to patients' histories of radiotherapy and/or neck dissection.
Methods
Records of 671 patients who had undergone head and neck reconstruction in our institution from April 2018 to March 2024 were retrospectively reviewed. We divided patients into four groups based on their treatment history: radiotherapy alone (RT, n = 82), neck dissection alone (ND, n = 43), both radiotherapy and neck dissection (NDRT, n = 39), and intact neck with no history of radiotherapy or neck dissection (IN, n = 488). We collected data on flap types, defect areas, selected recipient vessels, and the occurrence of flap failure. We also assessed the risk factors for flap failure.
Results
In Group RT, 66 of 84 (79%) recipient vessels were located within irradiated areas. In contrast, in Group ND, 37 of 45 (82%) recipient vessels were outside the dissected areas. No significant association was observed between overall flap failure and variables we assessed. However, our additional flap failure analysis by arterial or venous factors showed an association with the patients' history of radiation treatment (p < 0.05) and in cases where anastomosed vessels were actually located within irradiated areas (p < 0.05).
Conclusion
In patients with previous radiotherapy history, recipient vessels even within irradiated areas can often be successfully used as recipient vessels. However, after undergoing irradiation treatment, the risk of venous-related flap failure may be higher compared with the non-irradiated area; thus, it necessitates careful consideration during reconstruction.
期刊介绍:
Microsurgery is an international and interdisciplinary publication of original contributions concerning surgery under microscopic magnification. Microsurgery publishes clinical studies, research papers, invited articles, relevant reviews, and other scholarly works from all related fields including orthopaedic surgery, otolaryngology, pediatric surgery, plastic surgery, urology, and vascular surgery.