美国限速设置的上下文敏感道路分类框架

IF 3.8 Q2 TRANSPORTATION
Cheng-Kai Hsu , Melody Tsao , Marcel E. Moran , Julia B. Griswold , Robert J. Schneider , John M. Bigham
{"title":"美国限速设置的上下文敏感道路分类框架","authors":"Cheng-Kai Hsu ,&nbsp;Melody Tsao ,&nbsp;Marcel E. Moran ,&nbsp;Julia B. Griswold ,&nbsp;Robert J. Schneider ,&nbsp;John M. Bigham","doi":"10.1016/j.trip.2025.101621","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In the US, speed limit setting (SLS) procedures have historically relied on driver-behavior-based methods, such as the 85th percentile speed, which are considered objective and allow for consistent application. However, this approach has notable shortcomings, including drivers’ tendency to underestimate their speeds, speed creep, and insufficient consideration of vulnerable road users, which may conflict with the Safe System Approach and Vision Zero initiatives endorsed by the USDOT (US Department of Transportation). In contrast, context-sensitive approaches, which classify roads based on roadway typologies, have been developed in countries like New Zealand, Sweden, the Netherlands, and Australia. While effective, these approaches have largely been applied outside the US, leaving many US roads with speed limits that may not fit their surroundings or adequately address pedestrian and cyclist safety. Drawing on New Zealand’s One Network Framework, we developed a US-based, context-sensitive roadway classification framework for urban and suburban areas that incorporates “<em>Place,”</em> which captures surrounding land uses and locational contexts, and “<em>Movement,</em>” which relates to the road’s transport function. Using nationally available data from the Smart Location Database (SLD) and the Highway Performance Monitoring System (HPMS), we evaluated our roadway classification framework through internal reviews by our research team and external interviews with state-level practitioners, uncovering both opportunities and challenges in adopting a context-sensitive SLS approach in the US. Our findings demonstrate the feasibility of creating an objective context-sensitive roadway classification in the US and offer insights for developing new speed-limit guidance aligned with the Safe System framework.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36621,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives","volume":"33 ","pages":"Article 101621"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A context-sensitive roadway classification framework for speed limit setting in the US\",\"authors\":\"Cheng-Kai Hsu ,&nbsp;Melody Tsao ,&nbsp;Marcel E. Moran ,&nbsp;Julia B. Griswold ,&nbsp;Robert J. Schneider ,&nbsp;John M. Bigham\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.trip.2025.101621\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In the US, speed limit setting (SLS) procedures have historically relied on driver-behavior-based methods, such as the 85th percentile speed, which are considered objective and allow for consistent application. However, this approach has notable shortcomings, including drivers’ tendency to underestimate their speeds, speed creep, and insufficient consideration of vulnerable road users, which may conflict with the Safe System Approach and Vision Zero initiatives endorsed by the USDOT (US Department of Transportation). In contrast, context-sensitive approaches, which classify roads based on roadway typologies, have been developed in countries like New Zealand, Sweden, the Netherlands, and Australia. While effective, these approaches have largely been applied outside the US, leaving many US roads with speed limits that may not fit their surroundings or adequately address pedestrian and cyclist safety. Drawing on New Zealand’s One Network Framework, we developed a US-based, context-sensitive roadway classification framework for urban and suburban areas that incorporates “<em>Place,”</em> which captures surrounding land uses and locational contexts, and “<em>Movement,</em>” which relates to the road’s transport function. Using nationally available data from the Smart Location Database (SLD) and the Highway Performance Monitoring System (HPMS), we evaluated our roadway classification framework through internal reviews by our research team and external interviews with state-level practitioners, uncovering both opportunities and challenges in adopting a context-sensitive SLS approach in the US. Our findings demonstrate the feasibility of creating an objective context-sensitive roadway classification in the US and offer insights for developing new speed-limit guidance aligned with the Safe System framework.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36621,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives\",\"volume\":\"33 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101621\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590198225003008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"TRANSPORTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590198225003008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在美国,限速设置(SLS)程序历来依赖于基于驾驶员行为的方法,例如第85百分位速度,这被认为是客观的,并且允许一致的应用。然而,这种方法有明显的缺点,包括司机倾向于低估他们的速度,速度蠕变,以及对弱势道路使用者的考虑不足,这可能与美国交通部(USDOT)认可的安全系统方法和零愿景倡议相冲突。相比之下,新西兰、瑞典、荷兰和澳大利亚等国已经开发出基于道路类型对道路进行分类的环境敏感方法。这些方法虽然有效,但大多在美国以外的地区得到了应用,导致许多美国道路的限速可能不适合周围环境,也不能充分考虑行人和骑自行车者的安全。借鉴新西兰的“一个网络框架”(One Network Framework),我们为城市和郊区开发了一个基于美国的、环境敏感的道路分类框架,该框架结合了“地点”(Place)和“运动”(Movement),前者捕捉了周围的土地使用和位置背景,后者与道路的运输功能有关。利用智能位置数据库(SLD)和公路性能监测系统(HPMS)的全国可用数据,我们通过研究团队的内部审查和对州一级从业人员的外部访谈,评估了我们的道路分类框架,揭示了在美国采用环境敏感的SLS方法的机遇和挑战。我们的研究结果证明了在美国创建客观的环境敏感道路分类的可行性,并为开发与安全系统框架一致的新限速指导提供了见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A context-sensitive roadway classification framework for speed limit setting in the US
In the US, speed limit setting (SLS) procedures have historically relied on driver-behavior-based methods, such as the 85th percentile speed, which are considered objective and allow for consistent application. However, this approach has notable shortcomings, including drivers’ tendency to underestimate their speeds, speed creep, and insufficient consideration of vulnerable road users, which may conflict with the Safe System Approach and Vision Zero initiatives endorsed by the USDOT (US Department of Transportation). In contrast, context-sensitive approaches, which classify roads based on roadway typologies, have been developed in countries like New Zealand, Sweden, the Netherlands, and Australia. While effective, these approaches have largely been applied outside the US, leaving many US roads with speed limits that may not fit their surroundings or adequately address pedestrian and cyclist safety. Drawing on New Zealand’s One Network Framework, we developed a US-based, context-sensitive roadway classification framework for urban and suburban areas that incorporates “Place,” which captures surrounding land uses and locational contexts, and “Movement,” which relates to the road’s transport function. Using nationally available data from the Smart Location Database (SLD) and the Highway Performance Monitoring System (HPMS), we evaluated our roadway classification framework through internal reviews by our research team and external interviews with state-level practitioners, uncovering both opportunities and challenges in adopting a context-sensitive SLS approach in the US. Our findings demonstrate the feasibility of creating an objective context-sensitive roadway classification in the US and offer insights for developing new speed-limit guidance aligned with the Safe System framework.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives Engineering-Automotive Engineering
CiteScore
12.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
185
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信