人工弯曲与患者特异性下颌种植体的生物力学对比。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q4 BIOPHYSICS
Shengping Zhong, Yi Zhang, Qimin Shi, Jeroen Van Dessel, Joris Geusens, Sam Coppieters, Bart Van Meerbeek, Constantinus Politis, Shoufeng Yang, Yi Sun
{"title":"人工弯曲与患者特异性下颌种植体的生物力学对比。","authors":"Shengping Zhong, Yi Zhang, Qimin Shi, Jeroen Van Dessel, Joris Geusens, Sam Coppieters, Bart Van Meerbeek, Constantinus Politis, Shoufeng Yang, Yi Sun","doi":"10.1115/1.4069665","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The patient-specific mandibular reconstruction plate (PSMRP) has gained prominence for its precise adaptation to mandibular contours and reported enhanced mechanical reliability compared to the manual-bent mandibular reconstruction plate (MBMRP). Despite this, a biomechanical comparison between MBMRP and PSMRP is essential for informed clinical decision-making and advancing the field of mandibular reconstruction. Thereupon, biomechanical behavior was compared between two reconstructed mandibles with the MBMRP made of commercial pure titanium plate and the PSMRP stemmed from a common ramus reconstruction case, respectively, in physiological simulation using finite element analyses. Results reveal that the PSMRP presents greater safety and better stability to the reconstructed mandible than the MBMRP in the physiological situation, indicated by over 45% lower peak equivalent von Mises stress and more than 35% less maximum displacement.</p>","PeriodicalId":54871,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biomechanical Engineering-Transactions of the Asme","volume":" ","pages":"1-26"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biomechanics of manual-bent versus patient-specific mandibular implants.\",\"authors\":\"Shengping Zhong, Yi Zhang, Qimin Shi, Jeroen Van Dessel, Joris Geusens, Sam Coppieters, Bart Van Meerbeek, Constantinus Politis, Shoufeng Yang, Yi Sun\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/1.4069665\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The patient-specific mandibular reconstruction plate (PSMRP) has gained prominence for its precise adaptation to mandibular contours and reported enhanced mechanical reliability compared to the manual-bent mandibular reconstruction plate (MBMRP). Despite this, a biomechanical comparison between MBMRP and PSMRP is essential for informed clinical decision-making and advancing the field of mandibular reconstruction. Thereupon, biomechanical behavior was compared between two reconstructed mandibles with the MBMRP made of commercial pure titanium plate and the PSMRP stemmed from a common ramus reconstruction case, respectively, in physiological simulation using finite element analyses. Results reveal that the PSMRP presents greater safety and better stability to the reconstructed mandible than the MBMRP in the physiological situation, indicated by over 45% lower peak equivalent von Mises stress and more than 35% less maximum displacement.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54871,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Biomechanical Engineering-Transactions of the Asme\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-26\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Biomechanical Engineering-Transactions of the Asme\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4069665\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biomechanical Engineering-Transactions of the Asme","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4069665","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

与手动弯曲下颌重建板(MBMRP)相比,患者特异性下颌重建板(PSMRP)因其对下颌轮廓的精确适应和增强的机械可靠性而受到重视。尽管如此,MBMRP和PSMRP的生物力学比较对于临床决策和推进下颌骨重建领域至关重要。在此基础上,分别采用商用纯钛板制作的MBMRP和来自一个常见支重建病例的PSMRP进行生理模拟,比较其生物力学行为。结果表明,在生理情况下,与MBMRP相比,PSMRP对重建下颌骨具有更高的安全性和稳定性,峰值等效von Mises应力降低45%以上,最大位移减小35%以上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Biomechanics of manual-bent versus patient-specific mandibular implants.

The patient-specific mandibular reconstruction plate (PSMRP) has gained prominence for its precise adaptation to mandibular contours and reported enhanced mechanical reliability compared to the manual-bent mandibular reconstruction plate (MBMRP). Despite this, a biomechanical comparison between MBMRP and PSMRP is essential for informed clinical decision-making and advancing the field of mandibular reconstruction. Thereupon, biomechanical behavior was compared between two reconstructed mandibles with the MBMRP made of commercial pure titanium plate and the PSMRP stemmed from a common ramus reconstruction case, respectively, in physiological simulation using finite element analyses. Results reveal that the PSMRP presents greater safety and better stability to the reconstructed mandible than the MBMRP in the physiological situation, indicated by over 45% lower peak equivalent von Mises stress and more than 35% less maximum displacement.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
169
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Artificial Organs and Prostheses; Bioinstrumentation and Measurements; Bioheat Transfer; Biomaterials; Biomechanics; Bioprocess Engineering; Cellular Mechanics; Design and Control of Biological Systems; Physiological Systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信