与异丙酚相比,雷马唑仑在内窥镜逆行胆管造影中保留氧气储备并提高镇静安全性。

IF 6.7 2区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Jee Hoon Kim, Kyuho Lee, Sung Jin Lee, Galam Leem, Hee Seung Lee, Jeong Youp Park, Seungmin Bang, Seung Woo Park, Namo Kim, Moon Jae Chung
{"title":"与异丙酚相比,雷马唑仑在内窥镜逆行胆管造影中保留氧气储备并提高镇静安全性。","authors":"Jee Hoon Kim, Kyuho Lee, Sung Jin Lee, Galam Leem, Hee Seung Lee, Jeong Youp Park, Seungmin Bang, Seung Woo Park, Namo Kim, Moon Jae Chung","doi":"10.1002/ueg2.70105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Remimazolam is a short-acting benzodiazepine with less cardiorespiratory depression compared with propofol. The Oxygen Reserve Index (ORi) reflects oxygenation status in the mild hyperoxic range and can detect subtle respiratory depression induced by sedatives.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We compared remimazolam and propofol in patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and assessed the ORi to evaluate the impact of these sedatives on oxygen reserve.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients scheduled for ERCP were enrolled and randomly assigned to either the remimazolam or the propofol group. They received 0.1 mg kg<sup>-1</sup> remimazolam or 1.0 mg kg<sup>-1</sup> propofol, with bolus injections of either 2 mg remimazolam or 20 mg propofol added as required, according to the group allocation. The primary outcome was the incidence of oxygen reserve depletion, defined as an ORi reduction to 0.00.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 102 patients, oxygen reserve depletion was more frequent in the propofol group (70.6% vs. 41.2%, odds ratio 0.29, 95% confidence interval 0.13-0.66, p = 0.003). The time from sedative injection to endoscope insertion, length of stay in the recovery room, and overall procedure time were comparable between the groups. Patients in the remimazolam group reported a lower incidence of procedural recall, fewer complaints of inadequate sedation, and higher satisfaction scores than those in the propofol group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Remimazolam effectively preserved the oxygen reserve compared with propofol, lowering the risk of hypoxia during sedation. Remimazolam was also associated with more favorable recovery profiles for patients undergoing ERCP, making it a safe and preferred sedative for this procedure.</p><p><strong>Trail registration: </strong>Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT06359834.</p>","PeriodicalId":23444,"journal":{"name":"United European Gastroenterology Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Remimazolam Preserves Oxygen Reserve and Improves Sedation Safety Compared to Propofol in Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography.\",\"authors\":\"Jee Hoon Kim, Kyuho Lee, Sung Jin Lee, Galam Leem, Hee Seung Lee, Jeong Youp Park, Seungmin Bang, Seung Woo Park, Namo Kim, Moon Jae Chung\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ueg2.70105\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Remimazolam is a short-acting benzodiazepine with less cardiorespiratory depression compared with propofol. The Oxygen Reserve Index (ORi) reflects oxygenation status in the mild hyperoxic range and can detect subtle respiratory depression induced by sedatives.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We compared remimazolam and propofol in patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and assessed the ORi to evaluate the impact of these sedatives on oxygen reserve.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients scheduled for ERCP were enrolled and randomly assigned to either the remimazolam or the propofol group. They received 0.1 mg kg<sup>-1</sup> remimazolam or 1.0 mg kg<sup>-1</sup> propofol, with bolus injections of either 2 mg remimazolam or 20 mg propofol added as required, according to the group allocation. The primary outcome was the incidence of oxygen reserve depletion, defined as an ORi reduction to 0.00.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 102 patients, oxygen reserve depletion was more frequent in the propofol group (70.6% vs. 41.2%, odds ratio 0.29, 95% confidence interval 0.13-0.66, p = 0.003). The time from sedative injection to endoscope insertion, length of stay in the recovery room, and overall procedure time were comparable between the groups. Patients in the remimazolam group reported a lower incidence of procedural recall, fewer complaints of inadequate sedation, and higher satisfaction scores than those in the propofol group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Remimazolam effectively preserved the oxygen reserve compared with propofol, lowering the risk of hypoxia during sedation. Remimazolam was also associated with more favorable recovery profiles for patients undergoing ERCP, making it a safe and preferred sedative for this procedure.</p><p><strong>Trail registration: </strong>Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT06359834.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23444,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"United European Gastroenterology Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"United European Gastroenterology Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ueg2.70105\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"United European Gastroenterology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ueg2.70105","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:Remimazolam是一种短效苯二氮卓类药物,与异丙酚相比,其心肺抑制作用较小。氧储备指数(ORi)反映了轻度高氧范围内的氧合状态,可以检测镇静剂引起的轻微呼吸抑制。目的:比较雷马唑仑和异丙酚在内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)患者中的作用,并评估ORi,以评价这两种镇静剂对氧储备的影响。方法:入选ERCP患者,随机分为雷马唑仑组和异丙酚组。他们接受0.1 mg kg-1雷马唑仑或1.0 mg kg-1异丙酚,并根据需要注射2 mg雷马唑仑或20 mg异丙酚,根据组分配。主要终点是氧储备耗尽的发生率,定义为ORi降低到0.00。结果:102例患者中,异丙酚组氧储备耗竭发生率更高(70.6% vs 41.2%,优势比0.29,95%可信区间0.13 ~ 0.66,p = 0.003)。从注射镇静剂到插入内窥镜的时间、在恢复室的停留时间和总体手术时间在两组之间具有可比性。与异丙酚组相比,雷马唑仑组患者报告的程序性回忆发生率较低,镇静不足的投诉较少,满意度评分较高。结论:与异丙酚相比,雷马唑仑能有效保存氧气储备,降低镇静过程中缺氧的风险。Remimazolam也与ERCP患者更有利的恢复情况相关,使其成为该手术中安全且首选的镇静剂。试验注册:Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT06359834。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Remimazolam Preserves Oxygen Reserve and Improves Sedation Safety Compared to Propofol in Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography.

Background: Remimazolam is a short-acting benzodiazepine with less cardiorespiratory depression compared with propofol. The Oxygen Reserve Index (ORi) reflects oxygenation status in the mild hyperoxic range and can detect subtle respiratory depression induced by sedatives.

Objective: We compared remimazolam and propofol in patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and assessed the ORi to evaluate the impact of these sedatives on oxygen reserve.

Methods: Patients scheduled for ERCP were enrolled and randomly assigned to either the remimazolam or the propofol group. They received 0.1 mg kg-1 remimazolam or 1.0 mg kg-1 propofol, with bolus injections of either 2 mg remimazolam or 20 mg propofol added as required, according to the group allocation. The primary outcome was the incidence of oxygen reserve depletion, defined as an ORi reduction to 0.00.

Results: Among the 102 patients, oxygen reserve depletion was more frequent in the propofol group (70.6% vs. 41.2%, odds ratio 0.29, 95% confidence interval 0.13-0.66, p = 0.003). The time from sedative injection to endoscope insertion, length of stay in the recovery room, and overall procedure time were comparable between the groups. Patients in the remimazolam group reported a lower incidence of procedural recall, fewer complaints of inadequate sedation, and higher satisfaction scores than those in the propofol group.

Conclusions: Remimazolam effectively preserved the oxygen reserve compared with propofol, lowering the risk of hypoxia during sedation. Remimazolam was also associated with more favorable recovery profiles for patients undergoing ERCP, making it a safe and preferred sedative for this procedure.

Trail registration: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT06359834.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
United European Gastroenterology Journal
United European Gastroenterology Journal GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
13.30%
发文量
147
期刊介绍: United European Gastroenterology Journal (UEG Journal) is the official Journal of the United European Gastroenterology (UEG), a professional non-profit organisation combining all the leading European societies concerned with digestive disease. UEG’s member societies represent over 22,000 specialists working across medicine, surgery, paediatrics, GI oncology and endoscopy, which makes UEG a unique platform for collaboration and the exchange of knowledge.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信