Jee Hoon Kim, Kyuho Lee, Sung Jin Lee, Galam Leem, Hee Seung Lee, Jeong Youp Park, Seungmin Bang, Seung Woo Park, Namo Kim, Moon Jae Chung
{"title":"与异丙酚相比,雷马唑仑在内窥镜逆行胆管造影中保留氧气储备并提高镇静安全性。","authors":"Jee Hoon Kim, Kyuho Lee, Sung Jin Lee, Galam Leem, Hee Seung Lee, Jeong Youp Park, Seungmin Bang, Seung Woo Park, Namo Kim, Moon Jae Chung","doi":"10.1002/ueg2.70105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Remimazolam is a short-acting benzodiazepine with less cardiorespiratory depression compared with propofol. The Oxygen Reserve Index (ORi) reflects oxygenation status in the mild hyperoxic range and can detect subtle respiratory depression induced by sedatives.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We compared remimazolam and propofol in patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and assessed the ORi to evaluate the impact of these sedatives on oxygen reserve.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients scheduled for ERCP were enrolled and randomly assigned to either the remimazolam or the propofol group. They received 0.1 mg kg<sup>-1</sup> remimazolam or 1.0 mg kg<sup>-1</sup> propofol, with bolus injections of either 2 mg remimazolam or 20 mg propofol added as required, according to the group allocation. The primary outcome was the incidence of oxygen reserve depletion, defined as an ORi reduction to 0.00.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 102 patients, oxygen reserve depletion was more frequent in the propofol group (70.6% vs. 41.2%, odds ratio 0.29, 95% confidence interval 0.13-0.66, p = 0.003). The time from sedative injection to endoscope insertion, length of stay in the recovery room, and overall procedure time were comparable between the groups. Patients in the remimazolam group reported a lower incidence of procedural recall, fewer complaints of inadequate sedation, and higher satisfaction scores than those in the propofol group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Remimazolam effectively preserved the oxygen reserve compared with propofol, lowering the risk of hypoxia during sedation. Remimazolam was also associated with more favorable recovery profiles for patients undergoing ERCP, making it a safe and preferred sedative for this procedure.</p><p><strong>Trail registration: </strong>Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT06359834.</p>","PeriodicalId":23444,"journal":{"name":"United European Gastroenterology Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Remimazolam Preserves Oxygen Reserve and Improves Sedation Safety Compared to Propofol in Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography.\",\"authors\":\"Jee Hoon Kim, Kyuho Lee, Sung Jin Lee, Galam Leem, Hee Seung Lee, Jeong Youp Park, Seungmin Bang, Seung Woo Park, Namo Kim, Moon Jae Chung\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ueg2.70105\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Remimazolam is a short-acting benzodiazepine with less cardiorespiratory depression compared with propofol. The Oxygen Reserve Index (ORi) reflects oxygenation status in the mild hyperoxic range and can detect subtle respiratory depression induced by sedatives.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We compared remimazolam and propofol in patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and assessed the ORi to evaluate the impact of these sedatives on oxygen reserve.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients scheduled for ERCP were enrolled and randomly assigned to either the remimazolam or the propofol group. They received 0.1 mg kg<sup>-1</sup> remimazolam or 1.0 mg kg<sup>-1</sup> propofol, with bolus injections of either 2 mg remimazolam or 20 mg propofol added as required, according to the group allocation. The primary outcome was the incidence of oxygen reserve depletion, defined as an ORi reduction to 0.00.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 102 patients, oxygen reserve depletion was more frequent in the propofol group (70.6% vs. 41.2%, odds ratio 0.29, 95% confidence interval 0.13-0.66, p = 0.003). The time from sedative injection to endoscope insertion, length of stay in the recovery room, and overall procedure time were comparable between the groups. Patients in the remimazolam group reported a lower incidence of procedural recall, fewer complaints of inadequate sedation, and higher satisfaction scores than those in the propofol group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Remimazolam effectively preserved the oxygen reserve compared with propofol, lowering the risk of hypoxia during sedation. Remimazolam was also associated with more favorable recovery profiles for patients undergoing ERCP, making it a safe and preferred sedative for this procedure.</p><p><strong>Trail registration: </strong>Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT06359834.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23444,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"United European Gastroenterology Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"United European Gastroenterology Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ueg2.70105\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"United European Gastroenterology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ueg2.70105","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Remimazolam Preserves Oxygen Reserve and Improves Sedation Safety Compared to Propofol in Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography.
Background: Remimazolam is a short-acting benzodiazepine with less cardiorespiratory depression compared with propofol. The Oxygen Reserve Index (ORi) reflects oxygenation status in the mild hyperoxic range and can detect subtle respiratory depression induced by sedatives.
Objective: We compared remimazolam and propofol in patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and assessed the ORi to evaluate the impact of these sedatives on oxygen reserve.
Methods: Patients scheduled for ERCP were enrolled and randomly assigned to either the remimazolam or the propofol group. They received 0.1 mg kg-1 remimazolam or 1.0 mg kg-1 propofol, with bolus injections of either 2 mg remimazolam or 20 mg propofol added as required, according to the group allocation. The primary outcome was the incidence of oxygen reserve depletion, defined as an ORi reduction to 0.00.
Results: Among the 102 patients, oxygen reserve depletion was more frequent in the propofol group (70.6% vs. 41.2%, odds ratio 0.29, 95% confidence interval 0.13-0.66, p = 0.003). The time from sedative injection to endoscope insertion, length of stay in the recovery room, and overall procedure time were comparable between the groups. Patients in the remimazolam group reported a lower incidence of procedural recall, fewer complaints of inadequate sedation, and higher satisfaction scores than those in the propofol group.
Conclusions: Remimazolam effectively preserved the oxygen reserve compared with propofol, lowering the risk of hypoxia during sedation. Remimazolam was also associated with more favorable recovery profiles for patients undergoing ERCP, making it a safe and preferred sedative for this procedure.
期刊介绍:
United European Gastroenterology Journal (UEG Journal) is the official Journal of the United European Gastroenterology (UEG), a professional non-profit organisation combining all the leading European societies concerned with digestive disease. UEG’s member societies represent over 22,000 specialists working across medicine, surgery, paediatrics, GI oncology and endoscopy, which makes UEG a unique platform for collaboration and the exchange of knowledge.