医学生、外科住院医师、医务人员和普外科教师在学习外科时的学习风格:范围回顾。

IF 3.2 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Gabriela Gouvea Silva, Marco Antonio Ribeiro Filho, Carlos Dario da Silva Costa, Stela Regina Pedroso Vilela Torres de Carvalho, Joao Daniel de Souza Menezes, Matheus Querino da Silva, William Donega Martinez, Bruno Cardoso Goncalves, Natália Almeida de Arnaldo Silva Rodriguez Castro, Luiz Vianney Cidrão Nunes, Emerson Roberto Santos, Helena Landim Gonçalves Cristóvão, Alexandre Lins Werneck, Alex Bertolazzo Quitério, Sonia Maria Maciel Lopes, Denise Vaz-Oliani, Fernando Facio, Patrícia da Silva Fucuta, Alba Regina de Abreu Lima, Vania M S Brienze, Heloisa Cristina Caldas, Julio Cesar Andre
{"title":"医学生、外科住院医师、医务人员和普外科教师在学习外科时的学习风格:范围回顾。","authors":"Gabriela Gouvea Silva, Marco Antonio Ribeiro Filho, Carlos Dario da Silva Costa, Stela Regina Pedroso Vilela Torres de Carvalho, Joao Daniel de Souza Menezes, Matheus Querino da Silva, William Donega Martinez, Bruno Cardoso Goncalves, Natália Almeida de Arnaldo Silva Rodriguez Castro, Luiz Vianney Cidrão Nunes, Emerson Roberto Santos, Helena Landim Gonçalves Cristóvão, Alexandre Lins Werneck, Alex Bertolazzo Quitério, Sonia Maria Maciel Lopes, Denise Vaz-Oliani, Fernando Facio, Patrícia da Silva Fucuta, Alba Regina de Abreu Lima, Vania M S Brienze, Heloisa Cristina Caldas, Julio Cesar Andre","doi":"10.2196/66766","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Learning style is a biologically and developmentally imposed configuration of personal characteristics that makes the same teaching method effective for some and ineffective for others. Studies support a relationship between learning style and career choice, resulting in learning style patterns observed in distinct types of residency programs, which can also be applied to general surgery, from medical school to the latest stages of training. The methodologies, populations, and contexts of the few studies pertinent to the matter are very different from one another, and a scoping review on this theme will unequivocally enhance and organize what is already known.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The goal of this study is to identify and map out data from studies that report on learning styles in medical students, surgical residents, medical staff, and surgical teachers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The search strategy was performed on September 25, 2023, by a librarian and digital search strategy expert, through the descriptors \"learning, style\" and \"surgery.\" The databases consulted were Embase, SCOPUS, Web of Science, and PubMed through descriptors and their synonyms, according to MeSH (Medical Subject Headings). Of the 213 articles found, 135 articles remained after the exclusion of duplicates. The remaining 78 articles were analyzed by 3 of the researchers independently. A total of 27 articles were selected, and 2 articles were excluded because the full article was not found.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 25 articles were included in the review. A total of 96% (n=24) of the articles used cognitive theories as their theoretical basis. Regarding learning style instruments, 36% (n=9) articles used the visual, aural, read, and kinesthetic learning method instrument, and 40% (n=10) articles chose Kolb's learning style inventory. The papers concentrate especially on the 2010s, and most of them are from North America (16/25, 64%) or Europe (6/25, 24%). The smallest study had 15 participants and the biggest had 1549 participants. The included studies primarily focused on surgical residents (21/25, 84%), with fewer targeting faculty and staff (9/25, 36%). The primary objectives of the studies were to investigate the relationship between learning styles and performance (15/25, 60%), gender differences (7/25, 28%), changes over time (4/25, 16%), and motivation (3/25, 12%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This scoping review reveals a limited and geographically concentrated body of research on learning styles in surgery education, primarily focusing on surgical residents and using Kolb's learning style inventory and visual, aural, read, and kinesthetic learning method instruments. Considerable gaps exist regarding geographical diversity and the study of medical staff and faculty. These findings underscore the need for future research with a broader scope to better inform educational strategies in surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":36236,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Medical Education","volume":"11 ","pages":"e66766"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12413186/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Learning Styles Characterize Medical Students, Surgical Residents, Medical Staff, and General Surgery Teachers While Learning Surgery: Scoping Review.\",\"authors\":\"Gabriela Gouvea Silva, Marco Antonio Ribeiro Filho, Carlos Dario da Silva Costa, Stela Regina Pedroso Vilela Torres de Carvalho, Joao Daniel de Souza Menezes, Matheus Querino da Silva, William Donega Martinez, Bruno Cardoso Goncalves, Natália Almeida de Arnaldo Silva Rodriguez Castro, Luiz Vianney Cidrão Nunes, Emerson Roberto Santos, Helena Landim Gonçalves Cristóvão, Alexandre Lins Werneck, Alex Bertolazzo Quitério, Sonia Maria Maciel Lopes, Denise Vaz-Oliani, Fernando Facio, Patrícia da Silva Fucuta, Alba Regina de Abreu Lima, Vania M S Brienze, Heloisa Cristina Caldas, Julio Cesar Andre\",\"doi\":\"10.2196/66766\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Learning style is a biologically and developmentally imposed configuration of personal characteristics that makes the same teaching method effective for some and ineffective for others. Studies support a relationship between learning style and career choice, resulting in learning style patterns observed in distinct types of residency programs, which can also be applied to general surgery, from medical school to the latest stages of training. The methodologies, populations, and contexts of the few studies pertinent to the matter are very different from one another, and a scoping review on this theme will unequivocally enhance and organize what is already known.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The goal of this study is to identify and map out data from studies that report on learning styles in medical students, surgical residents, medical staff, and surgical teachers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The search strategy was performed on September 25, 2023, by a librarian and digital search strategy expert, through the descriptors \\\"learning, style\\\" and \\\"surgery.\\\" The databases consulted were Embase, SCOPUS, Web of Science, and PubMed through descriptors and their synonyms, according to MeSH (Medical Subject Headings). Of the 213 articles found, 135 articles remained after the exclusion of duplicates. The remaining 78 articles were analyzed by 3 of the researchers independently. A total of 27 articles were selected, and 2 articles were excluded because the full article was not found.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 25 articles were included in the review. A total of 96% (n=24) of the articles used cognitive theories as their theoretical basis. Regarding learning style instruments, 36% (n=9) articles used the visual, aural, read, and kinesthetic learning method instrument, and 40% (n=10) articles chose Kolb's learning style inventory. The papers concentrate especially on the 2010s, and most of them are from North America (16/25, 64%) or Europe (6/25, 24%). The smallest study had 15 participants and the biggest had 1549 participants. The included studies primarily focused on surgical residents (21/25, 84%), with fewer targeting faculty and staff (9/25, 36%). The primary objectives of the studies were to investigate the relationship between learning styles and performance (15/25, 60%), gender differences (7/25, 28%), changes over time (4/25, 16%), and motivation (3/25, 12%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This scoping review reveals a limited and geographically concentrated body of research on learning styles in surgery education, primarily focusing on surgical residents and using Kolb's learning style inventory and visual, aural, read, and kinesthetic learning method instruments. Considerable gaps exist regarding geographical diversity and the study of medical staff and faculty. These findings underscore the need for future research with a broader scope to better inform educational strategies in surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36236,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JMIR Medical Education\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"e66766\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12413186/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JMIR Medical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2196/66766\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/66766","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:学习风格是一种生物和发展强加的个人特征配置,它使相同的教学方法对一些人有效,对另一些人无效。研究支持学习风格和职业选择之间的关系,从而在不同类型的住院医师项目中观察到学习风格模式,这也可以应用于普通外科,从医学院到最新阶段的培训。与这一问题有关的少数研究的方法、人口和背景彼此非常不同,对这一主题的范围审查将明确加强和组织已有的知识。目的:本研究的目的是从医学生、外科住院医师、医务人员和外科教师的学习风格报告中识别和绘制数据。方法:检索策略由图书管理员和数字检索策略专家于2023年9月25日通过“学习,风格”和“手术”描述符执行。根据MeSH(医学主题标题),通过描述符和同义词查阅了Embase、SCOPUS、Web of Science和PubMed数据库。在发现的213篇文章中,排除重复后剩下135篇。剩下的78篇文章由3名研究人员独立分析。共入选27篇文章,其中2篇因未找到全文而被排除。结果:共纳入25篇文献。96% (n=24)的文章采用认知理论作为理论基础。关于学习风格工具,36% (n=9)的文章使用了视觉、听觉、阅读和动觉学习方法工具,40% (n=10)的文章选择了Kolb的学习风格量表。这些论文主要集中在2010年代,其中大部分来自北美(16/ 25,64%)或欧洲(6/ 25,24%)。最小的研究有15名参与者,最大的研究有1549名参与者。纳入的研究主要集中在外科住院医师(21/25,84%),较少针对教职员工(9/25,36%)。研究的主要目的是调查学习风格与绩效(15/ 25,60 %)、性别差异(7/ 25,28 %)、时间变化(4/ 25,16 %)和动机(3/ 25,12 %)之间的关系。结论:这一范围综述揭示了一个有限的、地理上集中的关于外科教育学习风格的研究主体,主要关注外科住院医师,并使用Kolb的学习风格量表和视觉、听觉、阅读和动觉学习方法工具。在地域多样性和医务人员和教员的研究方面存在相当大的差距。这些发现强调了未来需要更广泛的研究来更好地为外科教育策略提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

How Learning Styles Characterize Medical Students, Surgical Residents, Medical Staff, and General Surgery Teachers While Learning Surgery: Scoping Review.

How Learning Styles Characterize Medical Students, Surgical Residents, Medical Staff, and General Surgery Teachers While Learning Surgery: Scoping Review.

How Learning Styles Characterize Medical Students, Surgical Residents, Medical Staff, and General Surgery Teachers While Learning Surgery: Scoping Review.

How Learning Styles Characterize Medical Students, Surgical Residents, Medical Staff, and General Surgery Teachers While Learning Surgery: Scoping Review.

Background: Learning style is a biologically and developmentally imposed configuration of personal characteristics that makes the same teaching method effective for some and ineffective for others. Studies support a relationship between learning style and career choice, resulting in learning style patterns observed in distinct types of residency programs, which can also be applied to general surgery, from medical school to the latest stages of training. The methodologies, populations, and contexts of the few studies pertinent to the matter are very different from one another, and a scoping review on this theme will unequivocally enhance and organize what is already known.

Objective: The goal of this study is to identify and map out data from studies that report on learning styles in medical students, surgical residents, medical staff, and surgical teachers.

Methods: The search strategy was performed on September 25, 2023, by a librarian and digital search strategy expert, through the descriptors "learning, style" and "surgery." The databases consulted were Embase, SCOPUS, Web of Science, and PubMed through descriptors and their synonyms, according to MeSH (Medical Subject Headings). Of the 213 articles found, 135 articles remained after the exclusion of duplicates. The remaining 78 articles were analyzed by 3 of the researchers independently. A total of 27 articles were selected, and 2 articles were excluded because the full article was not found.

Results: A total of 25 articles were included in the review. A total of 96% (n=24) of the articles used cognitive theories as their theoretical basis. Regarding learning style instruments, 36% (n=9) articles used the visual, aural, read, and kinesthetic learning method instrument, and 40% (n=10) articles chose Kolb's learning style inventory. The papers concentrate especially on the 2010s, and most of them are from North America (16/25, 64%) or Europe (6/25, 24%). The smallest study had 15 participants and the biggest had 1549 participants. The included studies primarily focused on surgical residents (21/25, 84%), with fewer targeting faculty and staff (9/25, 36%). The primary objectives of the studies were to investigate the relationship between learning styles and performance (15/25, 60%), gender differences (7/25, 28%), changes over time (4/25, 16%), and motivation (3/25, 12%).

Conclusions: This scoping review reveals a limited and geographically concentrated body of research on learning styles in surgery education, primarily focusing on surgical residents and using Kolb's learning style inventory and visual, aural, read, and kinesthetic learning method instruments. Considerable gaps exist regarding geographical diversity and the study of medical staff and faculty. These findings underscore the need for future research with a broader scope to better inform educational strategies in surgery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JMIR Medical Education
JMIR Medical Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
54
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信