白细胞酯酶和亚硝酸盐检测诊断老年人细菌性尿症的准确性:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。

IF 8.5 1区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Ana Moragas, Ramon Monfà, Ana García-Sangenís, Carl Llor
{"title":"白细胞酯酶和亚硝酸盐检测诊断老年人细菌性尿症的准确性:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Ana Moragas, Ramon Monfà, Ana García-Sangenís, Carl Llor","doi":"10.1016/j.cmi.2025.08.027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Urine dipsticks are commonly used for the diagnosis of bacteriuria or urinary tract infections (UTIs).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the accuracy of positive leukocyte esterase or nitrite results from dipsticks (index test) for diagnosing bacteriuria in older individuals, using urine culture as the reference standard.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews from the inception date up to September 2025. We also searched the reference lists of all the studies identified.</p><p><strong>Study eligibility criteria: </strong>Both prospective observational cohort and case-control diagnostic studies were included. No language restriction was applied.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Individuals aged ≥60 years with or without symptoms of UTI in the community, nursing homes or hospitalized.</p><p><strong>Assessment of risk of bias: </strong>We used the Quality Assessment tool for Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS)-2 tool for assessing risk of bias.</p><p><strong>Methods of data synthesis: </strong>A random-effect meta-analysis was performed to determine the pooled sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of leukocyte esterase or nitrites for the detection of bacteriuria. International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) identifier: CRD42024561882.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1933 articles screened, 16 met inclusion criteria and had a moderate risk of bias. Ten studies were hospital-based; six were in nursing homes. Pooled urine dipstick sensitivity and specificity for bacteriuria were 90% (95% CI, 84%-94%) and 56% (43%-68%), respectively (diagnostic OR 11.4; 10.2-12.8). In symptomatic older adults, the sensitivity and specificity for predicting UTI were 92% (76%-97%) and 39% (19%-62%), respectively, with a diagnostic OR of 7.4 (3.9-10.9).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>A positive dipstick result is inconclusive and does not confirm bacteriuria or UTI in symptomatic older adults. Because of high asymptomatic bacteriuria prevalence in older individuals, bacteriuria alone lacks diagnostic value. These findings support discontinuing dipstick testing for UTI diagnosis in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":10444,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Microbiology and Infection","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accuracy of leukocyte esterase and nitrite tests for diagnosing bacteriuria in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Ana Moragas, Ramon Monfà, Ana García-Sangenís, Carl Llor\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cmi.2025.08.027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Urine dipsticks are commonly used for the diagnosis of bacteriuria or urinary tract infections (UTIs).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the accuracy of positive leukocyte esterase or nitrite results from dipsticks (index test) for diagnosing bacteriuria in older individuals, using urine culture as the reference standard.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews from the inception date up to September 2025. We also searched the reference lists of all the studies identified.</p><p><strong>Study eligibility criteria: </strong>Both prospective observational cohort and case-control diagnostic studies were included. No language restriction was applied.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Individuals aged ≥60 years with or without symptoms of UTI in the community, nursing homes or hospitalized.</p><p><strong>Assessment of risk of bias: </strong>We used the Quality Assessment tool for Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS)-2 tool for assessing risk of bias.</p><p><strong>Methods of data synthesis: </strong>A random-effect meta-analysis was performed to determine the pooled sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of leukocyte esterase or nitrites for the detection of bacteriuria. International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) identifier: CRD42024561882.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1933 articles screened, 16 met inclusion criteria and had a moderate risk of bias. Ten studies were hospital-based; six were in nursing homes. Pooled urine dipstick sensitivity and specificity for bacteriuria were 90% (95% CI, 84%-94%) and 56% (43%-68%), respectively (diagnostic OR 11.4; 10.2-12.8). In symptomatic older adults, the sensitivity and specificity for predicting UTI were 92% (76%-97%) and 39% (19%-62%), respectively, with a diagnostic OR of 7.4 (3.9-10.9).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>A positive dipstick result is inconclusive and does not confirm bacteriuria or UTI in symptomatic older adults. Because of high asymptomatic bacteriuria prevalence in older individuals, bacteriuria alone lacks diagnostic value. These findings support discontinuing dipstick testing for UTI diagnosis in this population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10444,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Microbiology and Infection\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Microbiology and Infection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2025.08.027\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Microbiology and Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2025.08.027","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尿试纸常用于诊断细菌尿和/或尿路感染(uti)。目的:以尿培养为参考标准,进行系统回顾和荟萃分析,评估试纸(指数试验)中白细胞酯酶和/或亚硝酸盐阳性结果诊断老年人细菌尿的准确性。数据来源:MEDLINE (Pubmed)、EMBASE和Cochrane系统评价数据库,起始日期至2025年4月。我们还检索了所有确定的研究的参考文献列表。研究资格标准:包括前瞻性观察队列研究和病例对照诊断研究。没有使用语言限制。参与者:在社区、养老院或住院的60岁或以上有或没有尿路感染症状的个人。偏倚风险评估:我们使用诊断准确性研究质量评估工具(QUADAS)-2工具来评估偏倚风险。数据综合方法:采用随机效应荟萃分析,确定白细胞酯酶和/或亚硝酸盐检测细菌尿的敏感性、特异性和预测值。普洛斯彼罗标识符:CRD42024561882。结果:在筛选的1933篇文章中,16篇符合纳入标准,具有中等偏倚风险。10项研究以医院为基础;其中6人住在养老院。集合尿试纸对细菌尿的敏感性和特异性分别为90% (95% CI, 84-94%)和56%(43-68%)(诊断优势比[DOR] 11.4; 10.4-12.7)。在有症状的老年人中,预测UTI的敏感性和特异性分别为92%(76-97%)和39% (19-62%),DOR为7.3(5.2-10.3)。讨论:试纸阳性结果是不确定的,不能证实有症状的老年人有细菌尿或尿路感染。由于无症状细菌尿在老年人中患病率高,单独的细菌尿缺乏诊断价值。这些发现支持在这一人群中停止使用试纸检测来诊断尿路感染。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Accuracy of leukocyte esterase and nitrite tests for diagnosing bacteriuria in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Urine dipsticks are commonly used for the diagnosis of bacteriuria or urinary tract infections (UTIs).

Objectives: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the accuracy of positive leukocyte esterase or nitrite results from dipsticks (index test) for diagnosing bacteriuria in older individuals, using urine culture as the reference standard.

Data sources: MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews from the inception date up to September 2025. We also searched the reference lists of all the studies identified.

Study eligibility criteria: Both prospective observational cohort and case-control diagnostic studies were included. No language restriction was applied.

Participants: Individuals aged ≥60 years with or without symptoms of UTI in the community, nursing homes or hospitalized.

Assessment of risk of bias: We used the Quality Assessment tool for Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS)-2 tool for assessing risk of bias.

Methods of data synthesis: A random-effect meta-analysis was performed to determine the pooled sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of leukocyte esterase or nitrites for the detection of bacteriuria. International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) identifier: CRD42024561882.

Results: Of 1933 articles screened, 16 met inclusion criteria and had a moderate risk of bias. Ten studies were hospital-based; six were in nursing homes. Pooled urine dipstick sensitivity and specificity for bacteriuria were 90% (95% CI, 84%-94%) and 56% (43%-68%), respectively (diagnostic OR 11.4; 10.2-12.8). In symptomatic older adults, the sensitivity and specificity for predicting UTI were 92% (76%-97%) and 39% (19%-62%), respectively, with a diagnostic OR of 7.4 (3.9-10.9).

Discussion: A positive dipstick result is inconclusive and does not confirm bacteriuria or UTI in symptomatic older adults. Because of high asymptomatic bacteriuria prevalence in older individuals, bacteriuria alone lacks diagnostic value. These findings support discontinuing dipstick testing for UTI diagnosis in this population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
25.30
自引率
2.10%
发文量
441
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Microbiology and Infection (CMI) is a monthly journal published by the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. It focuses on peer-reviewed papers covering basic and applied research in microbiology, infectious diseases, virology, parasitology, immunology, and epidemiology as they relate to therapy and diagnostics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信