超越大脑象限(FEQ)的FLAIR作为定性成像生物标志物:概念命题和原理证明。

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Ali A Alattar, Jiri Bartek, Carlin Chuck, Giovanni Kozel, Elaina J Wang, Hsien-Chung Chen, Parag Sanghvi, Eric T Wong, Sasmit Sarangi, Heinrich Elinzano, Sharonda Ben-Haim, Clark C Chen
{"title":"超越大脑象限(FEQ)的FLAIR作为定性成像生物标志物:概念命题和原理证明。","authors":"Ali A Alattar, Jiri Bartek, Carlin Chuck, Giovanni Kozel, Elaina J Wang, Hsien-Chung Chen, Parag Sanghvi, Eric T Wong, Sasmit Sarangi, Heinrich Elinzano, Sharonda Ben-Haim, Clark C Chen","doi":"10.1007/s10585-025-10370-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Significant variability exists in the use of corticosteroids for treating adverse radiation effects (ARE) after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) of brain metastasis (BM). Here, we determine the diagnostic utility of a quadrant-based, visual assessment of magnetic resonance (MR) FLAIR as an imaging biomarker for steroid-dependent ARE. FLAIR was assessed at four axial levels along the rostral-caudal axis of the cerebrum, defined by standard landmarks of superior temporal line, third ventricle, temporal horn, and fourth ventricle. Each axial level was divided into four quadrants, defined by 12, 3, 6, and 9 on a clock face. New, post-SRS FLAIR hyperintensity extending beyond any quadrant was defined as FEQ+. FEQ+ was then correlated with corticosteroid treatment instituted within a month of the MRI. To establish intra- and inter-rater reliability of FEQ, MR images from 20 patients (10 FEQ+ and 10 FEQ-) were assessed by three clinicians (a radiation oncologist and two neurosurgeons) for FEQ positivity. These results showed an > 85% intra- and inter-rater reliability (Cohen's Kappa and Fleiss' Kappa of 0.970 and 0.785, respectively, both p < 0.001). We tested the hypothesis that FEQ+ is associated with corticosteroid use post-SRS in an initial cohort of 40 patients. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of FEQ for corticosteroid treatment were 75.0%, 96.4%, 75.0%, and 90.0%, respectively. To validate these findings, we examined the association of FEQ and corticosteroid use in an independent cohort of 214 SRS-treated BM patients. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of FEQ for corticosteroid treatment in this validation cohort were 94.6%, 74.0%, 43.2%, and 98.5%, respectively. We conclude that FEQ is an imaging marker with high intra- and inter-rater reliability, with a high negative predictive value (90.0-98.5%) for steroid treatment in SRS-treated BM patients. These results lay the foundation for future studies of FEQ for research and clinical applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":10267,"journal":{"name":"Clinical & Experimental Metastasis","volume":"42 5","pages":"53"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"FLAIR extending beyond a quadrant (FEQ) of the cerebrum as a qualitative imaging biomarker: a conceptual proposition and proof-of-principle.\",\"authors\":\"Ali A Alattar, Jiri Bartek, Carlin Chuck, Giovanni Kozel, Elaina J Wang, Hsien-Chung Chen, Parag Sanghvi, Eric T Wong, Sasmit Sarangi, Heinrich Elinzano, Sharonda Ben-Haim, Clark C Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10585-025-10370-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Significant variability exists in the use of corticosteroids for treating adverse radiation effects (ARE) after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) of brain metastasis (BM). Here, we determine the diagnostic utility of a quadrant-based, visual assessment of magnetic resonance (MR) FLAIR as an imaging biomarker for steroid-dependent ARE. FLAIR was assessed at four axial levels along the rostral-caudal axis of the cerebrum, defined by standard landmarks of superior temporal line, third ventricle, temporal horn, and fourth ventricle. Each axial level was divided into four quadrants, defined by 12, 3, 6, and 9 on a clock face. New, post-SRS FLAIR hyperintensity extending beyond any quadrant was defined as FEQ+. FEQ+ was then correlated with corticosteroid treatment instituted within a month of the MRI. To establish intra- and inter-rater reliability of FEQ, MR images from 20 patients (10 FEQ+ and 10 FEQ-) were assessed by three clinicians (a radiation oncologist and two neurosurgeons) for FEQ positivity. These results showed an > 85% intra- and inter-rater reliability (Cohen's Kappa and Fleiss' Kappa of 0.970 and 0.785, respectively, both p < 0.001). We tested the hypothesis that FEQ+ is associated with corticosteroid use post-SRS in an initial cohort of 40 patients. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of FEQ for corticosteroid treatment were 75.0%, 96.4%, 75.0%, and 90.0%, respectively. To validate these findings, we examined the association of FEQ and corticosteroid use in an independent cohort of 214 SRS-treated BM patients. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of FEQ for corticosteroid treatment in this validation cohort were 94.6%, 74.0%, 43.2%, and 98.5%, respectively. We conclude that FEQ is an imaging marker with high intra- and inter-rater reliability, with a high negative predictive value (90.0-98.5%) for steroid treatment in SRS-treated BM patients. These results lay the foundation for future studies of FEQ for research and clinical applications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10267,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical & Experimental Metastasis\",\"volume\":\"42 5\",\"pages\":\"53\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical & Experimental Metastasis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10585-025-10370-1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical & Experimental Metastasis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10585-025-10370-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

脑转移(BM)立体定向放射手术(SRS)后使用皮质类固醇治疗不良辐射效应(ARE)存在显著的差异。在这里,我们确定了基于象限的诊断效用,磁共振(MR) FLAIR作为类固醇依赖性ARE的成像生物标志物的视觉评估。FLAIR沿着大脑的喙尾轴在四个轴向水平上进行评估,由颞上线、第三脑室、颞角和第四脑室的标准地标定义。每个轴向水平被分成四个象限,分别用钟面上的12,3,6,9来定义。新的,srs后FLAIR超强度超出任何象限被定义为FEQ+。FEQ+与MRI检查后一个月内进行的皮质类固醇治疗相关。为了建立FEQ的内部和内部可靠性,来自20名患者(10名FEQ+和10名FEQ-)的MR图像由三名临床医生(一名放射肿瘤学家和两名神经外科医生)评估FEQ阳性。这些结果显示,评级内和评级间的信度为0.85% (Cohen's Kappa和Fleiss' Kappa分别为0.970和0.785,均为p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
FLAIR extending beyond a quadrant (FEQ) of the cerebrum as a qualitative imaging biomarker: a conceptual proposition and proof-of-principle.

Significant variability exists in the use of corticosteroids for treating adverse radiation effects (ARE) after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) of brain metastasis (BM). Here, we determine the diagnostic utility of a quadrant-based, visual assessment of magnetic resonance (MR) FLAIR as an imaging biomarker for steroid-dependent ARE. FLAIR was assessed at four axial levels along the rostral-caudal axis of the cerebrum, defined by standard landmarks of superior temporal line, third ventricle, temporal horn, and fourth ventricle. Each axial level was divided into four quadrants, defined by 12, 3, 6, and 9 on a clock face. New, post-SRS FLAIR hyperintensity extending beyond any quadrant was defined as FEQ+. FEQ+ was then correlated with corticosteroid treatment instituted within a month of the MRI. To establish intra- and inter-rater reliability of FEQ, MR images from 20 patients (10 FEQ+ and 10 FEQ-) were assessed by three clinicians (a radiation oncologist and two neurosurgeons) for FEQ positivity. These results showed an > 85% intra- and inter-rater reliability (Cohen's Kappa and Fleiss' Kappa of 0.970 and 0.785, respectively, both p < 0.001). We tested the hypothesis that FEQ+ is associated with corticosteroid use post-SRS in an initial cohort of 40 patients. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of FEQ for corticosteroid treatment were 75.0%, 96.4%, 75.0%, and 90.0%, respectively. To validate these findings, we examined the association of FEQ and corticosteroid use in an independent cohort of 214 SRS-treated BM patients. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of FEQ for corticosteroid treatment in this validation cohort were 94.6%, 74.0%, 43.2%, and 98.5%, respectively. We conclude that FEQ is an imaging marker with high intra- and inter-rater reliability, with a high negative predictive value (90.0-98.5%) for steroid treatment in SRS-treated BM patients. These results lay the foundation for future studies of FEQ for research and clinical applications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
5.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: The Journal''s scope encompasses all aspects of metastasis research, whether laboratory-based, experimental or clinical and therapeutic. It covers such areas as molecular biology, pharmacology, tumor biology, and clinical cancer treatment (with all its subdivisions of surgery, chemotherapy and radio-therapy as well as pathology and epidemiology) insofar as these disciplines are concerned with the Journal''s core subject of metastasis formation, prevention and treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信