Beomkwan Namgoong, Daeyun Seo, Seongsoo Lim, Nanju Lee, Isong Kim, Seunghun Heo, Jihwan Kang, Cheyoun Kim, Hayoung Shin, Soyeon Park, Jaewon Park, Jiwoong Her, Min-Su Kim
{"title":"高流量鼻氧治疗对健康、麻醉、自主呼吸犬食管压和心血管功能的影响。","authors":"Beomkwan Namgoong, Daeyun Seo, Seongsoo Lim, Nanju Lee, Isong Kim, Seunghun Heo, Jihwan Kang, Cheyoun Kim, Hayoung Shin, Soyeon Park, Jaewon Park, Jiwoong Her, Min-Su Kim","doi":"10.2460/ajvr.25.05.0167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine whether high-flow nasal oxygen therapy (HFNOT) induces changes in esophageal pressure, a surrogate for intrathoracic pressure, and to evaluate the associated cardiovascular and respiratory effects in healthy dogs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective, randomized study was conducted in 6 healthy Beagles. Anesthesia was induced and maintained using alfaxalone total IV anesthesia. High-flow nasal oxygen therapy was applied in the following 4 stages: baseline, HFNOT at 1 and 2 L/kg/min (each for 10 minutes in a randomized order), and post-HFNOT (15-minute recovery period). Measurements taken at each stage included esophageal pressure, cardiovascular parameters, and respiratory parameters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both end-expiratory and end-inspiratory esophageal pressures increased in a flow rate-dependent manner (end-expiratory esophageal pressure: -1.2 ± 1.1, 1.3 ± 1.7, and 4.7 ± 3.0 cm H2O; end-inspiratory esophageal pressure: -7.1 ± 1.8, -4.2 ± 1.8, and -0.2 ± 3.4 cm H2O at baseline, 1 L/kg/min, and 2 L/kg/min, respectively). Cardiac index remained unchanged across flow rates, whereas mean arterial pressure increased at 2 L/kg/min compared with baseline (82.0 ± 7.2 vs 77.5 ± 7.9 mm Hg, respectively). Respiratory rate decreased at 2 L/kg/min compared with baseline (11 ± 3 vs 18 ± 6 breaths/min, respectively). Arterial blood gas values were not different across flow rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>High-flow nasal oxygen therapy increased esophageal pressure without cardiovascular compromise in healthy, anesthetized, spontaneously breathing dogs. Additionally, HFNOT reduced the respiratory rate without altering arterial blood gas values.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>In healthy, anesthetized dogs, HFNOT induced measurable changes in intrathoracic pressure without clinically relevant alteration in cardiovascular or respiratory function.</p>","PeriodicalId":7754,"journal":{"name":"American journal of veterinary research","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of high-flow nasal oxygen therapy on esophageal pressure and cardiovascular function in healthy, anesthetized, spontaneously breathing dogs.\",\"authors\":\"Beomkwan Namgoong, Daeyun Seo, Seongsoo Lim, Nanju Lee, Isong Kim, Seunghun Heo, Jihwan Kang, Cheyoun Kim, Hayoung Shin, Soyeon Park, Jaewon Park, Jiwoong Her, Min-Su Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.2460/ajvr.25.05.0167\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine whether high-flow nasal oxygen therapy (HFNOT) induces changes in esophageal pressure, a surrogate for intrathoracic pressure, and to evaluate the associated cardiovascular and respiratory effects in healthy dogs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective, randomized study was conducted in 6 healthy Beagles. Anesthesia was induced and maintained using alfaxalone total IV anesthesia. High-flow nasal oxygen therapy was applied in the following 4 stages: baseline, HFNOT at 1 and 2 L/kg/min (each for 10 minutes in a randomized order), and post-HFNOT (15-minute recovery period). Measurements taken at each stage included esophageal pressure, cardiovascular parameters, and respiratory parameters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both end-expiratory and end-inspiratory esophageal pressures increased in a flow rate-dependent manner (end-expiratory esophageal pressure: -1.2 ± 1.1, 1.3 ± 1.7, and 4.7 ± 3.0 cm H2O; end-inspiratory esophageal pressure: -7.1 ± 1.8, -4.2 ± 1.8, and -0.2 ± 3.4 cm H2O at baseline, 1 L/kg/min, and 2 L/kg/min, respectively). Cardiac index remained unchanged across flow rates, whereas mean arterial pressure increased at 2 L/kg/min compared with baseline (82.0 ± 7.2 vs 77.5 ± 7.9 mm Hg, respectively). Respiratory rate decreased at 2 L/kg/min compared with baseline (11 ± 3 vs 18 ± 6 breaths/min, respectively). Arterial blood gas values were not different across flow rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>High-flow nasal oxygen therapy increased esophageal pressure without cardiovascular compromise in healthy, anesthetized, spontaneously breathing dogs. Additionally, HFNOT reduced the respiratory rate without altering arterial blood gas values.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>In healthy, anesthetized dogs, HFNOT induced measurable changes in intrathoracic pressure without clinically relevant alteration in cardiovascular or respiratory function.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7754,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of veterinary research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of veterinary research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.25.05.0167\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of veterinary research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.25.05.0167","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:研究高流量鼻氧治疗(HFNOT)是否会引起食管压(代替胸内压)的变化,并评估其对健康犬心血管和呼吸系统的影响。方法:对6只健康比格犬进行前瞻性随机研究。麻醉诱导和维持采用阿法索龙全静脉麻醉。高流量鼻氧治疗分为以下4个阶段:基线、1和2 L/kg/min(随机顺序各10分钟)高流量鼻氧治疗和高流量鼻氧治疗后(15分钟恢复期)。每个阶段的测量包括食管压、心血管参数和呼吸参数。结果:呼气末和吸气末食管压力均以流速依赖的方式增加(呼气末食管压力:-1.2±1.1,1.3±1.7和4.7±3.0 cm H2O;吸气末食管压力:基线时-7.1±1.8,-4.2±1.8和-0.2±3.4 cm H2O,分别为1 L/kg/min和2 L/kg/min)。心脏指数在不同流速下保持不变,而平均动脉压与基线相比增加2 L/kg/min(分别为82.0±7.2 vs 77.5±7.9 mm Hg)。与基线相比,呼吸频率下降2 L/kg/min(分别为11±3次vs 18±6次/min)。动脉血气值在不同流速下无差异。结论:高流量鼻氧治疗增加了健康、麻醉、自主呼吸犬的食管压,但不损害心血管。此外,HFNOT在不改变动脉血气值的情况下降低呼吸频率。临床相关性:在健康的麻醉犬中,HFNOT可引起可测量的胸内压变化,而未引起心血管或呼吸功能的临床相关改变。
Impact of high-flow nasal oxygen therapy on esophageal pressure and cardiovascular function in healthy, anesthetized, spontaneously breathing dogs.
Objective: To determine whether high-flow nasal oxygen therapy (HFNOT) induces changes in esophageal pressure, a surrogate for intrathoracic pressure, and to evaluate the associated cardiovascular and respiratory effects in healthy dogs.
Methods: A prospective, randomized study was conducted in 6 healthy Beagles. Anesthesia was induced and maintained using alfaxalone total IV anesthesia. High-flow nasal oxygen therapy was applied in the following 4 stages: baseline, HFNOT at 1 and 2 L/kg/min (each for 10 minutes in a randomized order), and post-HFNOT (15-minute recovery period). Measurements taken at each stage included esophageal pressure, cardiovascular parameters, and respiratory parameters.
Results: Both end-expiratory and end-inspiratory esophageal pressures increased in a flow rate-dependent manner (end-expiratory esophageal pressure: -1.2 ± 1.1, 1.3 ± 1.7, and 4.7 ± 3.0 cm H2O; end-inspiratory esophageal pressure: -7.1 ± 1.8, -4.2 ± 1.8, and -0.2 ± 3.4 cm H2O at baseline, 1 L/kg/min, and 2 L/kg/min, respectively). Cardiac index remained unchanged across flow rates, whereas mean arterial pressure increased at 2 L/kg/min compared with baseline (82.0 ± 7.2 vs 77.5 ± 7.9 mm Hg, respectively). Respiratory rate decreased at 2 L/kg/min compared with baseline (11 ± 3 vs 18 ± 6 breaths/min, respectively). Arterial blood gas values were not different across flow rates.
Conclusions: High-flow nasal oxygen therapy increased esophageal pressure without cardiovascular compromise in healthy, anesthetized, spontaneously breathing dogs. Additionally, HFNOT reduced the respiratory rate without altering arterial blood gas values.
Clinical relevance: In healthy, anesthetized dogs, HFNOT induced measurable changes in intrathoracic pressure without clinically relevant alteration in cardiovascular or respiratory function.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Veterinary Research supports the collaborative exchange of information between researchers and clinicians by publishing novel research findings that bridge the gulf between basic research and clinical practice or that help to translate laboratory research and preclinical studies to the development of clinical trials and clinical practice. The journal welcomes submission of high-quality original studies and review articles in a wide range of scientific fields, including anatomy, anesthesiology, animal welfare, behavior, epidemiology, genetics, heredity, infectious disease, molecular biology, oncology, pharmacology, pathogenic mechanisms, physiology, surgery, theriogenology, toxicology, and vaccinology. Species of interest include production animals, companion animals, equids, exotic animals, birds, reptiles, and wild and marine animals. Reports of laboratory animal studies and studies involving the use of animals as experimental models of human diseases are considered only when the study results are of demonstrable benefit to the species used in the research or to another species of veterinary interest. Other fields of interest or animals species are not necessarily excluded from consideration, but such reports must focus on novel research findings. Submitted papers must make an original and substantial contribution to the veterinary medicine knowledge base; preliminary studies are not appropriate.