Domenico Scrutinio , Pietro Guida , Andrea Passantino
{"title":"心脏康复后死亡风险和功能能力改善与心力衰竭预后的相互作用。","authors":"Domenico Scrutinio , Pietro Guida , Andrea Passantino","doi":"10.1016/j.amjcard.2025.08.054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Whether risk of death interacts with change in 6-minute walking test (6MWT) distance after cardiac rehabilitation (CR) on heart failure (HF) prognosis is unknown. We studied 1,569 patients with HF admitted to 6 inpatient CR units. A 6MWT was performed at admission to and at discharge from CR. The primary outcome was 3-year mortality. The interaction of baseline risk and 50-meter increase in 6MWT distance on the primary outcome was tested using a Cox regression model with an interaction term between baseline risk and 50-meter increase. To further illustrate the interaction between baseline risk and change in 6MWT distance, participants were stratified into low- and high-risk subgroups. The p value for the interaction was 0.588. Three-year mortality was 16.1% in the low-risk and 53.7% in the high-risk subgroup. 43.0% of the low-risk and 43.4% of the high-risk patients achieved an increase ≥50 meters in 6MWT distance. The adjusted hazard ratio of 3-year mortality for the patients who achieved a 50-meter increase in 6MWT distance was 0.67 (0.47–0.96; p = 0.030) in the low-risk and 0.75 (0.61–0.91; p = 0.005) in the high-risk subgroup. These findings suggest that improvement in functional capacity after CR is associated with improved survival regardless of baseline risk of death.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7705,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Cardiology","volume":"258 ","pages":"Pages 41-48"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interaction of Risk of Death and Improvement in Functional Capacity After Cardiac Rehabilitation on Heart Failure Prognosis\",\"authors\":\"Domenico Scrutinio , Pietro Guida , Andrea Passantino\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.amjcard.2025.08.054\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Whether risk of death interacts with change in 6-minute walking test (6MWT) distance after cardiac rehabilitation (CR) on heart failure (HF) prognosis is unknown. We studied 1,569 patients with HF admitted to 6 inpatient CR units. A 6MWT was performed at admission to and at discharge from CR. The primary outcome was 3-year mortality. The interaction of baseline risk and 50-meter increase in 6MWT distance on the primary outcome was tested using a Cox regression model with an interaction term between baseline risk and 50-meter increase. To further illustrate the interaction between baseline risk and change in 6MWT distance, participants were stratified into low- and high-risk subgroups. The p value for the interaction was 0.588. Three-year mortality was 16.1% in the low-risk and 53.7% in the high-risk subgroup. 43.0% of the low-risk and 43.4% of the high-risk patients achieved an increase ≥50 meters in 6MWT distance. The adjusted hazard ratio of 3-year mortality for the patients who achieved a 50-meter increase in 6MWT distance was 0.67 (0.47–0.96; p = 0.030) in the low-risk and 0.75 (0.61–0.91; p = 0.005) in the high-risk subgroup. These findings suggest that improvement in functional capacity after CR is associated with improved survival regardless of baseline risk of death.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7705,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Cardiology\",\"volume\":\"258 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 41-48\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000291492500517X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000291492500517X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Interaction of Risk of Death and Improvement in Functional Capacity After Cardiac Rehabilitation on Heart Failure Prognosis
Whether risk of death interacts with change in 6-minute walking test (6MWT) distance after cardiac rehabilitation (CR) on heart failure (HF) prognosis is unknown. We studied 1,569 patients with HF admitted to 6 inpatient CR units. A 6MWT was performed at admission to and at discharge from CR. The primary outcome was 3-year mortality. The interaction of baseline risk and 50-meter increase in 6MWT distance on the primary outcome was tested using a Cox regression model with an interaction term between baseline risk and 50-meter increase. To further illustrate the interaction between baseline risk and change in 6MWT distance, participants were stratified into low- and high-risk subgroups. The p value for the interaction was 0.588. Three-year mortality was 16.1% in the low-risk and 53.7% in the high-risk subgroup. 43.0% of the low-risk and 43.4% of the high-risk patients achieved an increase ≥50 meters in 6MWT distance. The adjusted hazard ratio of 3-year mortality for the patients who achieved a 50-meter increase in 6MWT distance was 0.67 (0.47–0.96; p = 0.030) in the low-risk and 0.75 (0.61–0.91; p = 0.005) in the high-risk subgroup. These findings suggest that improvement in functional capacity after CR is associated with improved survival regardless of baseline risk of death.
期刊介绍:
Published 24 times a year, The American Journal of Cardiology® is an independent journal designed for cardiovascular disease specialists and internists with a subspecialty in cardiology throughout the world. AJC is an independent, scientific, peer-reviewed journal of original articles that focus on the practical, clinical approach to the diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular disease. AJC has one of the fastest acceptance to publication times in Cardiology. Features report on systemic hypertension, methodology, drugs, pacing, arrhythmia, preventive cardiology, congestive heart failure, valvular heart disease, congenital heart disease, and cardiomyopathy. Also included are editorials, readers'' comments, and symposia.