2000-2020年黄河流域土地利用动态下的洪水风险评价

IF 2.8 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Tongqing Liu, Shuxia Sun, Naixian Wang, Renqing Wang, Peiming Zheng, Hui Wang
{"title":"2000-2020年黄河流域土地利用动态下的洪水风险评价","authors":"Tongqing Liu,&nbsp;Shuxia Sun,&nbsp;Naixian Wang,&nbsp;Renqing Wang,&nbsp;Peiming Zheng,&nbsp;Hui Wang","doi":"10.1007/s12665-025-12526-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Floods are one of the most devastating natural disaster events globally and are strongly influenced by land use changes. This study crafted a holistic “hazard-sensitivity-vulnerability-restorability” flood risk assessment framework, integrating data from land use, natural environment, and socioeconomic factors. Using the Yellow River Basin (YRB) in China as an example from 2000 to 2020, it analyzed the spatiotemporal evolution of land use structure and flood risk, revealing their cluster pattern based on quantitative land use structure indices and flood risk index. Key findings include: (1) A gradient pattern of increasing flood risk from northwest to southeast in the YRB, with an overall trend of significant decrease followed by rebound from 2000 to 2020. (2) By 2020, land use homogenization occurred in middle-basin deserts due to grassland restoration, contrasting with down-basin fragmentation driven by built-up land expansion. (3) Global spatial correlation showed flood risk positively linked to cropland, built-up land and forest significantly but negatively associated with grassland significantly, highlighting land use trade-offs in flood mitigation. (4) Local spatial correlation revealed a “cold west (low risk - low structure index) vs. hot east (high risk – high structure index) \" differentiation, emphasizing zoning-based management needs. The study provides actionable insights for balancing flood resilience and land resource sustainability in the YRB. The proposed framework offers a transferable methodology for large river basins globally, particularly in regions facing coupled pressures of climate change and rapid urbanization.</p><h3>Graphical abstract</h3><div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>","PeriodicalId":542,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Earth Sciences","volume":"84 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Flood risk assessment under land use dynamics during 2000–2020 in the yellow river basin, China\",\"authors\":\"Tongqing Liu,&nbsp;Shuxia Sun,&nbsp;Naixian Wang,&nbsp;Renqing Wang,&nbsp;Peiming Zheng,&nbsp;Hui Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12665-025-12526-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Floods are one of the most devastating natural disaster events globally and are strongly influenced by land use changes. This study crafted a holistic “hazard-sensitivity-vulnerability-restorability” flood risk assessment framework, integrating data from land use, natural environment, and socioeconomic factors. Using the Yellow River Basin (YRB) in China as an example from 2000 to 2020, it analyzed the spatiotemporal evolution of land use structure and flood risk, revealing their cluster pattern based on quantitative land use structure indices and flood risk index. Key findings include: (1) A gradient pattern of increasing flood risk from northwest to southeast in the YRB, with an overall trend of significant decrease followed by rebound from 2000 to 2020. (2) By 2020, land use homogenization occurred in middle-basin deserts due to grassland restoration, contrasting with down-basin fragmentation driven by built-up land expansion. (3) Global spatial correlation showed flood risk positively linked to cropland, built-up land and forest significantly but negatively associated with grassland significantly, highlighting land use trade-offs in flood mitigation. (4) Local spatial correlation revealed a “cold west (low risk - low structure index) vs. hot east (high risk – high structure index) \\\" differentiation, emphasizing zoning-based management needs. The study provides actionable insights for balancing flood resilience and land resource sustainability in the YRB. The proposed framework offers a transferable methodology for large river basins globally, particularly in regions facing coupled pressures of climate change and rapid urbanization.</p><h3>Graphical abstract</h3><div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":542,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Earth Sciences\",\"volume\":\"84 18\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Earth Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12665-025-12526-4\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Earth Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12665-025-12526-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

洪水是全球最具破坏性的自然灾害之一,受土地利用变化的强烈影响。本研究综合了土地利用、自然环境和社会经济因素的数据,构建了一个整体的“灾害敏感性-脆弱性-可恢复性”洪水风险评估框架。以2000 - 2020年黄河流域为例,基于定量土地利用结构指数和洪水风险指数,分析了黄河流域土地利用结构与洪水风险的时空演变特征,揭示了二者的集聚格局。结果表明:①2000 - 2020年长江三角洲洪涝风险总体呈现由西北向东南递增的梯度格局,总体呈先显著降低后反弹的趋势;(2)到2020年,流域中游沙漠因草地恢复而出现土地利用均一化,而下游因建成区扩张而出现土地利用破碎化。③全球空间相关性显示,洪水风险与耕地、建设用地和森林呈显著正相关,与草地呈显著负相关,凸显了土地利用在防洪中的权衡。④局部空间相关性呈现“西部冷(低风险-低结构指数)vs东部热(高风险-高结构指数)”的分异,强调分区管理需求。该研究为平衡长江三角洲的防洪能力和土地资源可持续性提供了可行的见解。拟议的框架为全球大型河流流域提供了一种可转移的方法,特别是在面临气候变化和快速城市化双重压力的地区。图形抽象
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Flood risk assessment under land use dynamics during 2000–2020 in the yellow river basin, China

Floods are one of the most devastating natural disaster events globally and are strongly influenced by land use changes. This study crafted a holistic “hazard-sensitivity-vulnerability-restorability” flood risk assessment framework, integrating data from land use, natural environment, and socioeconomic factors. Using the Yellow River Basin (YRB) in China as an example from 2000 to 2020, it analyzed the spatiotemporal evolution of land use structure and flood risk, revealing their cluster pattern based on quantitative land use structure indices and flood risk index. Key findings include: (1) A gradient pattern of increasing flood risk from northwest to southeast in the YRB, with an overall trend of significant decrease followed by rebound from 2000 to 2020. (2) By 2020, land use homogenization occurred in middle-basin deserts due to grassland restoration, contrasting with down-basin fragmentation driven by built-up land expansion. (3) Global spatial correlation showed flood risk positively linked to cropland, built-up land and forest significantly but negatively associated with grassland significantly, highlighting land use trade-offs in flood mitigation. (4) Local spatial correlation revealed a “cold west (low risk - low structure index) vs. hot east (high risk – high structure index) " differentiation, emphasizing zoning-based management needs. The study provides actionable insights for balancing flood resilience and land resource sustainability in the YRB. The proposed framework offers a transferable methodology for large river basins globally, particularly in regions facing coupled pressures of climate change and rapid urbanization.

Graphical abstract

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Earth Sciences
Environmental Earth Sciences 环境科学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.60%
发文量
494
审稿时长
8.3 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Earth Sciences is an international multidisciplinary journal concerned with all aspects of interaction between humans, natural resources, ecosystems, special climates or unique geographic zones, and the earth: Water and soil contamination caused by waste management and disposal practices Environmental problems associated with transportation by land, air, or water Geological processes that may impact biosystems or humans Man-made or naturally occurring geological or hydrological hazards Environmental problems associated with the recovery of materials from the earth Environmental problems caused by extraction of minerals, coal, and ores, as well as oil and gas, water and alternative energy sources Environmental impacts of exploration and recultivation – Environmental impacts of hazardous materials Management of environmental data and information in data banks and information systems Dissemination of knowledge on techniques, methods, approaches and experiences to improve and remediate the environment In pursuit of these topics, the geoscientific disciplines are invited to contribute their knowledge and experience. Major disciplines include: hydrogeology, hydrochemistry, geochemistry, geophysics, engineering geology, remediation science, natural resources management, environmental climatology and biota, environmental geography, soil science and geomicrobiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信