Daniel J. Currie, Dalia Grad, Kathryn Webster, Huaning Liu, Stacey Acker, Nikolas Knowles, Monica R. Maly
{"title":"膝关节疼痛多,髋关节和踝关节力量少:膝关节骨性关节炎疼痛与关节力量的关系","authors":"Daniel J. Currie, Dalia Grad, Kathryn Webster, Huaning Liu, Stacey Acker, Nikolas Knowles, Monica R. Maly","doi":"10.1016/j.jbiomech.2025.112937","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>It is unknown how knee osteoarthritis pain affects joint power distribution while cycling. The study purposes were to (1) investigate if seat height, workload and any difference in hip or knee extensor strength affected asymmetry of hip, knee and ankle joint power during cycling; and (2) determine the relationship between knee osteoarthritis pain asymmetry and joint power asymmetry at the hips, knees, ankles and total leg. Asymmetry was the difference between dominant and non-dominant legs. Twenty-six participants (13 female, 13 male) with (n = 21) and without (n = 5) symptomatic knee osteoarthritis participated [age 64.3 (7.3) y, body mass index 27.0 (4.1) kg/m<sup>2</sup>]. Participants completed six cycling bouts at three seat heights (20°, 30°, 40° minimum knee flexion angle) and two workloads (40 W, 75 W) on a stationary bike. Self-reported pain was recorded for each knee before the first bout and after each bout. Three-dimensional kinematics and kinetics were collected synchronously with motion capture and instrumented pedals. A greater workload was associated with greater hip power asymmetry (p < 0.01); otherwise, seat height and workload did not affect power asymmetry (p > 0.05). Relationships were found between knee pain asymmetry and hip, ankle and total leg power asymmetry (p < 0.01), but not knee (p > 0.05). The hip, ankle and total leg with the more painful knee produced less power than the opposite side. The more painful knee cannot be assumed to produce less power than the contralateral side. These findings show that, at low workloads, clinicians can adjust seat height to patient preference without affecting joint power production during cycling.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15168,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biomechanics","volume":"192 ","pages":"Article 112937"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"More knee pain, less hip and ankle joint power: The relationship between knee osteoarthritis pain and joint power\",\"authors\":\"Daniel J. Currie, Dalia Grad, Kathryn Webster, Huaning Liu, Stacey Acker, Nikolas Knowles, Monica R. Maly\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbiomech.2025.112937\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>It is unknown how knee osteoarthritis pain affects joint power distribution while cycling. The study purposes were to (1) investigate if seat height, workload and any difference in hip or knee extensor strength affected asymmetry of hip, knee and ankle joint power during cycling; and (2) determine the relationship between knee osteoarthritis pain asymmetry and joint power asymmetry at the hips, knees, ankles and total leg. Asymmetry was the difference between dominant and non-dominant legs. Twenty-six participants (13 female, 13 male) with (n = 21) and without (n = 5) symptomatic knee osteoarthritis participated [age 64.3 (7.3) y, body mass index 27.0 (4.1) kg/m<sup>2</sup>]. Participants completed six cycling bouts at three seat heights (20°, 30°, 40° minimum knee flexion angle) and two workloads (40 W, 75 W) on a stationary bike. Self-reported pain was recorded for each knee before the first bout and after each bout. Three-dimensional kinematics and kinetics were collected synchronously with motion capture and instrumented pedals. A greater workload was associated with greater hip power asymmetry (p < 0.01); otherwise, seat height and workload did not affect power asymmetry (p > 0.05). Relationships were found between knee pain asymmetry and hip, ankle and total leg power asymmetry (p < 0.01), but not knee (p > 0.05). The hip, ankle and total leg with the more painful knee produced less power than the opposite side. The more painful knee cannot be assumed to produce less power than the contralateral side. These findings show that, at low workloads, clinicians can adjust seat height to patient preference without affecting joint power production during cycling.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15168,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of biomechanics\",\"volume\":\"192 \",\"pages\":\"Article 112937\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of biomechanics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002192902500449X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002192902500449X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
More knee pain, less hip and ankle joint power: The relationship between knee osteoarthritis pain and joint power
It is unknown how knee osteoarthritis pain affects joint power distribution while cycling. The study purposes were to (1) investigate if seat height, workload and any difference in hip or knee extensor strength affected asymmetry of hip, knee and ankle joint power during cycling; and (2) determine the relationship between knee osteoarthritis pain asymmetry and joint power asymmetry at the hips, knees, ankles and total leg. Asymmetry was the difference between dominant and non-dominant legs. Twenty-six participants (13 female, 13 male) with (n = 21) and without (n = 5) symptomatic knee osteoarthritis participated [age 64.3 (7.3) y, body mass index 27.0 (4.1) kg/m2]. Participants completed six cycling bouts at three seat heights (20°, 30°, 40° minimum knee flexion angle) and two workloads (40 W, 75 W) on a stationary bike. Self-reported pain was recorded for each knee before the first bout and after each bout. Three-dimensional kinematics and kinetics were collected synchronously with motion capture and instrumented pedals. A greater workload was associated with greater hip power asymmetry (p < 0.01); otherwise, seat height and workload did not affect power asymmetry (p > 0.05). Relationships were found between knee pain asymmetry and hip, ankle and total leg power asymmetry (p < 0.01), but not knee (p > 0.05). The hip, ankle and total leg with the more painful knee produced less power than the opposite side. The more painful knee cannot be assumed to produce less power than the contralateral side. These findings show that, at low workloads, clinicians can adjust seat height to patient preference without affecting joint power production during cycling.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Biomechanics publishes reports of original and substantial findings using the principles of mechanics to explore biological problems. Analytical, as well as experimental papers may be submitted, and the journal accepts original articles, surveys and perspective articles (usually by Editorial invitation only), book reviews and letters to the Editor. The criteria for acceptance of manuscripts include excellence, novelty, significance, clarity, conciseness and interest to the readership.
Papers published in the journal may cover a wide range of topics in biomechanics, including, but not limited to:
-Fundamental Topics - Biomechanics of the musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, and respiratory systems, mechanics of hard and soft tissues, biofluid mechanics, mechanics of prostheses and implant-tissue interfaces, mechanics of cells.
-Cardiovascular and Respiratory Biomechanics - Mechanics of blood-flow, air-flow, mechanics of the soft tissues, flow-tissue or flow-prosthesis interactions.
-Cell Biomechanics - Biomechanic analyses of cells, membranes and sub-cellular structures; the relationship of the mechanical environment to cell and tissue response.
-Dental Biomechanics - Design and analysis of dental tissues and prostheses, mechanics of chewing.
-Functional Tissue Engineering - The role of biomechanical factors in engineered tissue replacements and regenerative medicine.
-Injury Biomechanics - Mechanics of impact and trauma, dynamics of man-machine interaction.
-Molecular Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of biomolecules.
-Orthopedic Biomechanics - Mechanics of fracture and fracture fixation, mechanics of implants and implant fixation, mechanics of bones and joints, wear of natural and artificial joints.
-Rehabilitation Biomechanics - Analyses of gait, mechanics of prosthetics and orthotics.
-Sports Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of sports performance.