膝关节疼痛多,髋关节和踝关节力量少:膝关节骨性关节炎疼痛与关节力量的关系

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 BIOPHYSICS
Daniel J. Currie, Dalia Grad, Kathryn Webster, Huaning Liu, Stacey Acker, Nikolas Knowles, Monica R. Maly
{"title":"膝关节疼痛多,髋关节和踝关节力量少:膝关节骨性关节炎疼痛与关节力量的关系","authors":"Daniel J. Currie,&nbsp;Dalia Grad,&nbsp;Kathryn Webster,&nbsp;Huaning Liu,&nbsp;Stacey Acker,&nbsp;Nikolas Knowles,&nbsp;Monica R. Maly","doi":"10.1016/j.jbiomech.2025.112937","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>It is unknown how knee osteoarthritis pain affects joint power distribution while cycling. The study purposes were to (1) investigate if seat height, workload and any difference in hip or knee extensor strength affected asymmetry of hip, knee and ankle joint power during cycling; and (2) determine the relationship between knee osteoarthritis pain asymmetry and joint power asymmetry at the hips, knees, ankles and total leg. Asymmetry was the difference between dominant and non-dominant legs. Twenty-six participants (13 female, 13 male) with (n = 21) and without (n = 5) symptomatic knee osteoarthritis participated [age 64.3 (7.3) y, body mass index 27.0 (4.1) kg/m<sup>2</sup>]. Participants completed six cycling bouts at three seat heights (20°, 30°, 40° minimum knee flexion angle) and two workloads (40 W, 75 W) on a stationary bike. Self-reported pain was recorded for each knee before the first bout and after each bout. Three-dimensional kinematics and kinetics were collected synchronously with motion capture and instrumented pedals. A greater workload was associated with greater hip power asymmetry (p &lt; 0.01); otherwise, seat height and workload did not affect power asymmetry (p &gt; 0.05). Relationships were found between knee pain asymmetry and hip, ankle and total leg power asymmetry (p &lt; 0.01), but not knee (p &gt; 0.05). The hip, ankle and total leg with the more painful knee produced less power than the opposite side. The more painful knee cannot be assumed to produce less power than the contralateral side. These findings show that, at low workloads, clinicians can adjust seat height to patient preference without affecting joint power production during cycling.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15168,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biomechanics","volume":"192 ","pages":"Article 112937"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"More knee pain, less hip and ankle joint power: The relationship between knee osteoarthritis pain and joint power\",\"authors\":\"Daniel J. Currie,&nbsp;Dalia Grad,&nbsp;Kathryn Webster,&nbsp;Huaning Liu,&nbsp;Stacey Acker,&nbsp;Nikolas Knowles,&nbsp;Monica R. Maly\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbiomech.2025.112937\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>It is unknown how knee osteoarthritis pain affects joint power distribution while cycling. The study purposes were to (1) investigate if seat height, workload and any difference in hip or knee extensor strength affected asymmetry of hip, knee and ankle joint power during cycling; and (2) determine the relationship between knee osteoarthritis pain asymmetry and joint power asymmetry at the hips, knees, ankles and total leg. Asymmetry was the difference between dominant and non-dominant legs. Twenty-six participants (13 female, 13 male) with (n = 21) and without (n = 5) symptomatic knee osteoarthritis participated [age 64.3 (7.3) y, body mass index 27.0 (4.1) kg/m<sup>2</sup>]. Participants completed six cycling bouts at three seat heights (20°, 30°, 40° minimum knee flexion angle) and two workloads (40 W, 75 W) on a stationary bike. Self-reported pain was recorded for each knee before the first bout and after each bout. Three-dimensional kinematics and kinetics were collected synchronously with motion capture and instrumented pedals. A greater workload was associated with greater hip power asymmetry (p &lt; 0.01); otherwise, seat height and workload did not affect power asymmetry (p &gt; 0.05). Relationships were found between knee pain asymmetry and hip, ankle and total leg power asymmetry (p &lt; 0.01), but not knee (p &gt; 0.05). The hip, ankle and total leg with the more painful knee produced less power than the opposite side. The more painful knee cannot be assumed to produce less power than the contralateral side. These findings show that, at low workloads, clinicians can adjust seat height to patient preference without affecting joint power production during cycling.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15168,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of biomechanics\",\"volume\":\"192 \",\"pages\":\"Article 112937\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of biomechanics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002192902500449X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002192902500449X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目前尚不清楚膝关节骨关节炎疼痛如何影响骑车时关节的力量分配。研究的目的是:(1)调查骑车时座椅高度、工作量和髋关节或膝关节伸肌强度的差异是否会影响髋关节、膝关节和踝关节力量的不对称性;(2)确定膝关节骨性关节炎疼痛不对称与髋、膝、踝、全腿关节力量不对称的关系。不对称是优势腿和非优势腿之间的差异。有症状性膝骨关节炎(n = 21)和无症状性膝骨关节炎(n = 5)的26名参与者(13名女性,13名男性)[年龄64.3(7.3)岁,体重指数27.0 (4.1)kg/m2]。参与者在三种座椅高度(20°、30°、40°最小膝关节屈曲角度)和两种负荷(40 W、75 W)的固定自行车上完成了六次骑行。在第一次治疗前和每次治疗后记录每个膝盖的自我报告疼痛。三维运动学和动力学与运动捕捉和仪表踏板同步收集。更大的工作量与更大的髋关节力量不对称相关(p < 0.01);此外,座位高度和工作负荷对权力不对称没有影响(p > 0.05)。膝关节疼痛不对称与髋关节、踝关节和全腿力量不对称相关(p < 0.01),而与膝关节疼痛不对称无关(p > 0.05)。膝盖疼痛的髋部、踝关节和整条腿产生的力量比另一侧少。不能认为更疼痛的膝盖产生的力量比对侧的少。这些发现表明,在低工作量下,临床医生可以根据患者的喜好调整座椅高度,而不会影响骑车时关节的动力产生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
More knee pain, less hip and ankle joint power: The relationship between knee osteoarthritis pain and joint power
It is unknown how knee osteoarthritis pain affects joint power distribution while cycling. The study purposes were to (1) investigate if seat height, workload and any difference in hip or knee extensor strength affected asymmetry of hip, knee and ankle joint power during cycling; and (2) determine the relationship between knee osteoarthritis pain asymmetry and joint power asymmetry at the hips, knees, ankles and total leg. Asymmetry was the difference between dominant and non-dominant legs. Twenty-six participants (13 female, 13 male) with (n = 21) and without (n = 5) symptomatic knee osteoarthritis participated [age 64.3 (7.3) y, body mass index 27.0 (4.1) kg/m2]. Participants completed six cycling bouts at three seat heights (20°, 30°, 40° minimum knee flexion angle) and two workloads (40 W, 75 W) on a stationary bike. Self-reported pain was recorded for each knee before the first bout and after each bout. Three-dimensional kinematics and kinetics were collected synchronously with motion capture and instrumented pedals. A greater workload was associated with greater hip power asymmetry (p < 0.01); otherwise, seat height and workload did not affect power asymmetry (p > 0.05). Relationships were found between knee pain asymmetry and hip, ankle and total leg power asymmetry (p < 0.01), but not knee (p > 0.05). The hip, ankle and total leg with the more painful knee produced less power than the opposite side. The more painful knee cannot be assumed to produce less power than the contralateral side. These findings show that, at low workloads, clinicians can adjust seat height to patient preference without affecting joint power production during cycling.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of biomechanics
Journal of biomechanics 生物-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
345
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Biomechanics publishes reports of original and substantial findings using the principles of mechanics to explore biological problems. Analytical, as well as experimental papers may be submitted, and the journal accepts original articles, surveys and perspective articles (usually by Editorial invitation only), book reviews and letters to the Editor. The criteria for acceptance of manuscripts include excellence, novelty, significance, clarity, conciseness and interest to the readership. Papers published in the journal may cover a wide range of topics in biomechanics, including, but not limited to: -Fundamental Topics - Biomechanics of the musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, and respiratory systems, mechanics of hard and soft tissues, biofluid mechanics, mechanics of prostheses and implant-tissue interfaces, mechanics of cells. -Cardiovascular and Respiratory Biomechanics - Mechanics of blood-flow, air-flow, mechanics of the soft tissues, flow-tissue or flow-prosthesis interactions. -Cell Biomechanics - Biomechanic analyses of cells, membranes and sub-cellular structures; the relationship of the mechanical environment to cell and tissue response. -Dental Biomechanics - Design and analysis of dental tissues and prostheses, mechanics of chewing. -Functional Tissue Engineering - The role of biomechanical factors in engineered tissue replacements and regenerative medicine. -Injury Biomechanics - Mechanics of impact and trauma, dynamics of man-machine interaction. -Molecular Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of biomolecules. -Orthopedic Biomechanics - Mechanics of fracture and fracture fixation, mechanics of implants and implant fixation, mechanics of bones and joints, wear of natural and artificial joints. -Rehabilitation Biomechanics - Analyses of gait, mechanics of prosthetics and orthotics. -Sports Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of sports performance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信