Mao-Xin Wang , Gang Wang , Andy Yat Fai Leung , Dian-Qing Li , Siyuan Ma
{"title":"考虑近断层地震动速度脉冲和方向性的概率地震滑坡危险性评估的柔性边坡位移模型","authors":"Mao-Xin Wang , Gang Wang , Andy Yat Fai Leung , Dian-Qing Li , Siyuan Ma","doi":"10.1016/j.enggeo.2025.108313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Ground-motion characteristics and the dynamic response of slopes are important factors contributing to earthquake-induced landslides. In near-fault regions, seismic landslide displacement analyses are often simplified using Newmark rigid-block models and directionally-averaged displacement indices. Some prior studies developed near-fault slope displacement models for the strong-motion velocity-pulse direction. However, it remains unclear how ground-motion pulses and directionality affect the dynamic slope response in sliding displacement analyses. In this study, a probabilistic framework is presented for regional seismic landslide hazard assessment by incorporating near-fault ground-motion pulse and directionality effects. The framework generates slope displacement hazard curves through convolution of seismic hazard with flexible-slope displacement models, which are developed to statistically characterize the maximum (<em>D</em><sub>100</sub>) and median (<em>D</em><sub>50</sub>) slope displacements over horizontal orientations under near-fault pulse-like and non-pulse-like ground motions based on over 35 million nonlinear coupled sliding analyses. Pulse-like motions generally yield larger amplitude and stronger polarization of slope displacements than non-pulse-like motions. Strong-motion pulses and <em>D</em><sub>100</sub> are likely to occur within ±45° of fault-normal direction, while slope displacements in the fault-normal direction or the strongest-pulse direction could be significantly (over 25 %) smaller than <em>D</em><sub>100</sub>. The new displacement models reduce predction errors by more than 30 % compared with existing models. A hypothetical example and a real case of landslides triggered by the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake are used to illustrate the proposed framework. Compared with the traditional rigid-block analysis, an appropriate selection of <em>D</em><sub>100</sub> and <em>D</em><sub>50</sub> from the proposed flexible-slope models in regional analysis achieves better consistency with the observed landslide distribution.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11567,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Geology","volume":"357 ","pages":"Article 108313"},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Flexible slope displacement models for probabilistic seismic landslide hazard assessment incorporating near-fault ground-motion velocity pulse and directionality\",\"authors\":\"Mao-Xin Wang , Gang Wang , Andy Yat Fai Leung , Dian-Qing Li , Siyuan Ma\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.enggeo.2025.108313\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Ground-motion characteristics and the dynamic response of slopes are important factors contributing to earthquake-induced landslides. In near-fault regions, seismic landslide displacement analyses are often simplified using Newmark rigid-block models and directionally-averaged displacement indices. Some prior studies developed near-fault slope displacement models for the strong-motion velocity-pulse direction. However, it remains unclear how ground-motion pulses and directionality affect the dynamic slope response in sliding displacement analyses. In this study, a probabilistic framework is presented for regional seismic landslide hazard assessment by incorporating near-fault ground-motion pulse and directionality effects. The framework generates slope displacement hazard curves through convolution of seismic hazard with flexible-slope displacement models, which are developed to statistically characterize the maximum (<em>D</em><sub>100</sub>) and median (<em>D</em><sub>50</sub>) slope displacements over horizontal orientations under near-fault pulse-like and non-pulse-like ground motions based on over 35 million nonlinear coupled sliding analyses. Pulse-like motions generally yield larger amplitude and stronger polarization of slope displacements than non-pulse-like motions. Strong-motion pulses and <em>D</em><sub>100</sub> are likely to occur within ±45° of fault-normal direction, while slope displacements in the fault-normal direction or the strongest-pulse direction could be significantly (over 25 %) smaller than <em>D</em><sub>100</sub>. The new displacement models reduce predction errors by more than 30 % compared with existing models. A hypothetical example and a real case of landslides triggered by the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake are used to illustrate the proposed framework. Compared with the traditional rigid-block analysis, an appropriate selection of <em>D</em><sub>100</sub> and <em>D</em><sub>50</sub> from the proposed flexible-slope models in regional analysis achieves better consistency with the observed landslide distribution.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11567,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Engineering Geology\",\"volume\":\"357 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108313\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Engineering Geology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0013795225004090\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Geology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0013795225004090","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Flexible slope displacement models for probabilistic seismic landslide hazard assessment incorporating near-fault ground-motion velocity pulse and directionality
Ground-motion characteristics and the dynamic response of slopes are important factors contributing to earthquake-induced landslides. In near-fault regions, seismic landslide displacement analyses are often simplified using Newmark rigid-block models and directionally-averaged displacement indices. Some prior studies developed near-fault slope displacement models for the strong-motion velocity-pulse direction. However, it remains unclear how ground-motion pulses and directionality affect the dynamic slope response in sliding displacement analyses. In this study, a probabilistic framework is presented for regional seismic landslide hazard assessment by incorporating near-fault ground-motion pulse and directionality effects. The framework generates slope displacement hazard curves through convolution of seismic hazard with flexible-slope displacement models, which are developed to statistically characterize the maximum (D100) and median (D50) slope displacements over horizontal orientations under near-fault pulse-like and non-pulse-like ground motions based on over 35 million nonlinear coupled sliding analyses. Pulse-like motions generally yield larger amplitude and stronger polarization of slope displacements than non-pulse-like motions. Strong-motion pulses and D100 are likely to occur within ±45° of fault-normal direction, while slope displacements in the fault-normal direction or the strongest-pulse direction could be significantly (over 25 %) smaller than D100. The new displacement models reduce predction errors by more than 30 % compared with existing models. A hypothetical example and a real case of landslides triggered by the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake are used to illustrate the proposed framework. Compared with the traditional rigid-block analysis, an appropriate selection of D100 and D50 from the proposed flexible-slope models in regional analysis achieves better consistency with the observed landslide distribution.
期刊介绍:
Engineering Geology, an international interdisciplinary journal, serves as a bridge between earth sciences and engineering, focusing on geological and geotechnical engineering. It welcomes studies with relevance to engineering, environmental concerns, and safety, catering to engineering geologists with backgrounds in geology or civil/mining engineering. Topics include applied geomorphology, structural geology, geophysics, geochemistry, environmental geology, hydrogeology, land use planning, natural hazards, remote sensing, soil and rock mechanics, and applied geotechnical engineering. The journal provides a platform for research at the intersection of geology and engineering disciplines.