平衡能源效率和社会成本:来自收入差距的证据

IF 14.2 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Tianqi Chen , Wenyu Mu , Hui Li
{"title":"平衡能源效率和社会成本:来自收入差距的证据","authors":"Tianqi Chen ,&nbsp;Wenyu Mu ,&nbsp;Hui Li","doi":"10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108876","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As China pursues its dual goals of carbon neutrality and common prosperity, balancing energy efficiency improvements with social equity has become a key policy challenge. This study investigates the distributional effect of energy efficiency on urban-rural income inequality using panel data from 279 Chinese prefecture-level cities (2008–2021) and robust econometric techniques. The results reveal a nonlinear relationship between energy efficiency and the urban-rural income gap. While initial improvements narrow the gap, exceeding a critical threshold leads to widening income disparities. The analysis also highlights regional heterogeneity, showing that large cities tend to experience direct inequality increases, while smaller cities exhibit a U-shaped response. In resource-based cities, the resource curse effect further amplifies disparities. Furthermore, the study examines the institutional moderating mechanisms of government intervention, industrial upgrading, and marketization, which significantly shape the equity outcome of energy efficiency. Excessive government intervention may intensify inequality, while industrial upgrading and marketization help mitigate negative effects. These findings contribute to the literature on just energy transitions and offer practical guidance for achieving sustainable and inclusive growth.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11665,"journal":{"name":"Energy Economics","volume":"150 ","pages":"Article 108876"},"PeriodicalIF":14.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Balancing energy efficiency and social costs: Evidence from income disparities\",\"authors\":\"Tianqi Chen ,&nbsp;Wenyu Mu ,&nbsp;Hui Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108876\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>As China pursues its dual goals of carbon neutrality and common prosperity, balancing energy efficiency improvements with social equity has become a key policy challenge. This study investigates the distributional effect of energy efficiency on urban-rural income inequality using panel data from 279 Chinese prefecture-level cities (2008–2021) and robust econometric techniques. The results reveal a nonlinear relationship between energy efficiency and the urban-rural income gap. While initial improvements narrow the gap, exceeding a critical threshold leads to widening income disparities. The analysis also highlights regional heterogeneity, showing that large cities tend to experience direct inequality increases, while smaller cities exhibit a U-shaped response. In resource-based cities, the resource curse effect further amplifies disparities. Furthermore, the study examines the institutional moderating mechanisms of government intervention, industrial upgrading, and marketization, which significantly shape the equity outcome of energy efficiency. Excessive government intervention may intensify inequality, while industrial upgrading and marketization help mitigate negative effects. These findings contribute to the literature on just energy transitions and offer practical guidance for achieving sustainable and inclusive growth.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11665,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Economics\",\"volume\":\"150 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108876\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":14.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988325007030\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988325007030","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着中国追求碳中和和共同繁荣的双重目标,平衡能源效率的提高与社会公平已成为一项关键的政策挑战。本研究利用中国279个地级市(2008-2021年)的面板数据和稳健的计量经济学技术,探讨了能源效率对城乡收入不平等的分配效应。结果表明,能源效率与城乡收入差距之间存在非线性关系。虽然最初的改善缩小了差距,但超过一个关键阈值会导致收入差距扩大。该分析还强调了区域异质性,表明大城市往往会经历直接的不平等增加,而较小的城市则呈现u型反应。在资源型城市,资源诅咒效应进一步放大了差距。政府干预、产业升级和市场化的制度调节机制对能效公平结果有显著影响。过度的政府干预可能加剧不平等,而产业升级和市场化有助于缓解负面影响。这些发现有助于文献公正的能源转型,并为实现可持续和包容性增长提供实际指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Balancing energy efficiency and social costs: Evidence from income disparities
As China pursues its dual goals of carbon neutrality and common prosperity, balancing energy efficiency improvements with social equity has become a key policy challenge. This study investigates the distributional effect of energy efficiency on urban-rural income inequality using panel data from 279 Chinese prefecture-level cities (2008–2021) and robust econometric techniques. The results reveal a nonlinear relationship between energy efficiency and the urban-rural income gap. While initial improvements narrow the gap, exceeding a critical threshold leads to widening income disparities. The analysis also highlights regional heterogeneity, showing that large cities tend to experience direct inequality increases, while smaller cities exhibit a U-shaped response. In resource-based cities, the resource curse effect further amplifies disparities. Furthermore, the study examines the institutional moderating mechanisms of government intervention, industrial upgrading, and marketization, which significantly shape the equity outcome of energy efficiency. Excessive government intervention may intensify inequality, while industrial upgrading and marketization help mitigate negative effects. These findings contribute to the literature on just energy transitions and offer practical guidance for achieving sustainable and inclusive growth.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Economics
Energy Economics ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
18.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
524
期刊介绍: Energy Economics is a field journal that focuses on energy economics and energy finance. It covers various themes including the exploitation, conversion, and use of energy, markets for energy commodities and derivatives, regulation and taxation, forecasting, environment and climate, international trade, development, and monetary policy. The journal welcomes contributions that utilize diverse methods such as experiments, surveys, econometrics, decomposition, simulation models, equilibrium models, optimization models, and analytical models. It publishes a combination of papers employing different methods to explore a wide range of topics. The journal's replication policy encourages the submission of replication studies, wherein researchers reproduce and extend the key results of original studies while explaining any differences. Energy Economics is indexed and abstracted in several databases including Environmental Abstracts, Fuel and Energy Abstracts, Social Sciences Citation Index, GEOBASE, Social & Behavioral Sciences, Journal of Economic Literature, INSPEC, and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信