{"title":"平衡能源效率和社会成本:来自收入差距的证据","authors":"Tianqi Chen , Wenyu Mu , Hui Li","doi":"10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108876","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As China pursues its dual goals of carbon neutrality and common prosperity, balancing energy efficiency improvements with social equity has become a key policy challenge. This study investigates the distributional effect of energy efficiency on urban-rural income inequality using panel data from 279 Chinese prefecture-level cities (2008–2021) and robust econometric techniques. The results reveal a nonlinear relationship between energy efficiency and the urban-rural income gap. While initial improvements narrow the gap, exceeding a critical threshold leads to widening income disparities. The analysis also highlights regional heterogeneity, showing that large cities tend to experience direct inequality increases, while smaller cities exhibit a U-shaped response. In resource-based cities, the resource curse effect further amplifies disparities. Furthermore, the study examines the institutional moderating mechanisms of government intervention, industrial upgrading, and marketization, which significantly shape the equity outcome of energy efficiency. Excessive government intervention may intensify inequality, while industrial upgrading and marketization help mitigate negative effects. These findings contribute to the literature on just energy transitions and offer practical guidance for achieving sustainable and inclusive growth.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11665,"journal":{"name":"Energy Economics","volume":"150 ","pages":"Article 108876"},"PeriodicalIF":14.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Balancing energy efficiency and social costs: Evidence from income disparities\",\"authors\":\"Tianqi Chen , Wenyu Mu , Hui Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108876\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>As China pursues its dual goals of carbon neutrality and common prosperity, balancing energy efficiency improvements with social equity has become a key policy challenge. This study investigates the distributional effect of energy efficiency on urban-rural income inequality using panel data from 279 Chinese prefecture-level cities (2008–2021) and robust econometric techniques. The results reveal a nonlinear relationship between energy efficiency and the urban-rural income gap. While initial improvements narrow the gap, exceeding a critical threshold leads to widening income disparities. The analysis also highlights regional heterogeneity, showing that large cities tend to experience direct inequality increases, while smaller cities exhibit a U-shaped response. In resource-based cities, the resource curse effect further amplifies disparities. Furthermore, the study examines the institutional moderating mechanisms of government intervention, industrial upgrading, and marketization, which significantly shape the equity outcome of energy efficiency. Excessive government intervention may intensify inequality, while industrial upgrading and marketization help mitigate negative effects. These findings contribute to the literature on just energy transitions and offer practical guidance for achieving sustainable and inclusive growth.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11665,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Economics\",\"volume\":\"150 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108876\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":14.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988325007030\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988325007030","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Balancing energy efficiency and social costs: Evidence from income disparities
As China pursues its dual goals of carbon neutrality and common prosperity, balancing energy efficiency improvements with social equity has become a key policy challenge. This study investigates the distributional effect of energy efficiency on urban-rural income inequality using panel data from 279 Chinese prefecture-level cities (2008–2021) and robust econometric techniques. The results reveal a nonlinear relationship between energy efficiency and the urban-rural income gap. While initial improvements narrow the gap, exceeding a critical threshold leads to widening income disparities. The analysis also highlights regional heterogeneity, showing that large cities tend to experience direct inequality increases, while smaller cities exhibit a U-shaped response. In resource-based cities, the resource curse effect further amplifies disparities. Furthermore, the study examines the institutional moderating mechanisms of government intervention, industrial upgrading, and marketization, which significantly shape the equity outcome of energy efficiency. Excessive government intervention may intensify inequality, while industrial upgrading and marketization help mitigate negative effects. These findings contribute to the literature on just energy transitions and offer practical guidance for achieving sustainable and inclusive growth.
期刊介绍:
Energy Economics is a field journal that focuses on energy economics and energy finance. It covers various themes including the exploitation, conversion, and use of energy, markets for energy commodities and derivatives, regulation and taxation, forecasting, environment and climate, international trade, development, and monetary policy. The journal welcomes contributions that utilize diverse methods such as experiments, surveys, econometrics, decomposition, simulation models, equilibrium models, optimization models, and analytical models. It publishes a combination of papers employing different methods to explore a wide range of topics. The journal's replication policy encourages the submission of replication studies, wherein researchers reproduce and extend the key results of original studies while explaining any differences. Energy Economics is indexed and abstracted in several databases including Environmental Abstracts, Fuel and Energy Abstracts, Social Sciences Citation Index, GEOBASE, Social & Behavioral Sciences, Journal of Economic Literature, INSPEC, and more.