电力和绿色证书相互依赖市场中的投标行为

IF 14.2 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Kajsa Ganhammar
{"title":"电力和绿色证书相互依赖市场中的投标行为","authors":"Kajsa Ganhammar","doi":"10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108849","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Market-based climate policies have received increased attention, making it important to understand how they affect competition in the electricity market. This paper focuses on the green certificate policy which financially supports producers of renewably sourced electricity by means of tradable certificates, and develops a duopoly model that incorporates both the electricity and the green certificate markets in an auction-based setting. Producers are privately informed about their generation costs, and the results suggest that whether or not they are drawn from the same distribution has important implications for market outcomes. In particular, if the subsidised technology has a higher expected marginal cost than the conventional one (e.g., one bio-fuelled and one fossil-fuelled technology), the certificate policy can improve competition and efficiency in the electricity market. Conversely, if producers have the same expected marginal cost (e.g., one mature, non-subsidised and one emerging renewable technology), the advantage the policy creates enables the subsidised producer to bid higher at given cost as the probability of winning the electricity auction increases. This undermines competition and results in high consumer prices of electricity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11665,"journal":{"name":"Energy Economics","volume":"150 ","pages":"Article 108849"},"PeriodicalIF":14.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bidding behaviour in interdependent markets for electricity and green certificates\",\"authors\":\"Kajsa Ganhammar\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108849\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Market-based climate policies have received increased attention, making it important to understand how they affect competition in the electricity market. This paper focuses on the green certificate policy which financially supports producers of renewably sourced electricity by means of tradable certificates, and develops a duopoly model that incorporates both the electricity and the green certificate markets in an auction-based setting. Producers are privately informed about their generation costs, and the results suggest that whether or not they are drawn from the same distribution has important implications for market outcomes. In particular, if the subsidised technology has a higher expected marginal cost than the conventional one (e.g., one bio-fuelled and one fossil-fuelled technology), the certificate policy can improve competition and efficiency in the electricity market. Conversely, if producers have the same expected marginal cost (e.g., one mature, non-subsidised and one emerging renewable technology), the advantage the policy creates enables the subsidised producer to bid higher at given cost as the probability of winning the electricity auction increases. This undermines competition and results in high consumer prices of electricity.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11665,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Economics\",\"volume\":\"150 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108849\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":14.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988325006760\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988325006760","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基于市场的气候政策受到了越来越多的关注,因此了解它们如何影响电力市场的竞争变得非常重要。本文重点研究了绿色证书政策,该政策通过可交易证书为可再生能源电力生产商提供财政支持,并在拍卖的基础上建立了一个将电力和绿色证书市场结合起来的双寡头垄断模型。生产商私下了解他们的发电成本,结果表明,他们是否来自相同的分布,对市场结果有重要影响。特别是,如果补贴技术的预期边际成本高于传统技术(例如,一种生物燃料和一种化石燃料技术),则证书政策可以改善电力市场的竞争和效率。相反,如果生产者具有相同的预期边际成本(例如,一种成熟的,非补贴的和一种新兴的可再生能源技术),则政策创造的优势使补贴生产者能够在给定成本下出价更高,因为赢得电力拍卖的可能性增加。这破坏了竞争,导致电力消费价格高企。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bidding behaviour in interdependent markets for electricity and green certificates
Market-based climate policies have received increased attention, making it important to understand how they affect competition in the electricity market. This paper focuses on the green certificate policy which financially supports producers of renewably sourced electricity by means of tradable certificates, and develops a duopoly model that incorporates both the electricity and the green certificate markets in an auction-based setting. Producers are privately informed about their generation costs, and the results suggest that whether or not they are drawn from the same distribution has important implications for market outcomes. In particular, if the subsidised technology has a higher expected marginal cost than the conventional one (e.g., one bio-fuelled and one fossil-fuelled technology), the certificate policy can improve competition and efficiency in the electricity market. Conversely, if producers have the same expected marginal cost (e.g., one mature, non-subsidised and one emerging renewable technology), the advantage the policy creates enables the subsidised producer to bid higher at given cost as the probability of winning the electricity auction increases. This undermines competition and results in high consumer prices of electricity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Economics
Energy Economics ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
18.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
524
期刊介绍: Energy Economics is a field journal that focuses on energy economics and energy finance. It covers various themes including the exploitation, conversion, and use of energy, markets for energy commodities and derivatives, regulation and taxation, forecasting, environment and climate, international trade, development, and monetary policy. The journal welcomes contributions that utilize diverse methods such as experiments, surveys, econometrics, decomposition, simulation models, equilibrium models, optimization models, and analytical models. It publishes a combination of papers employing different methods to explore a wide range of topics. The journal's replication policy encourages the submission of replication studies, wherein researchers reproduce and extend the key results of original studies while explaining any differences. Energy Economics is indexed and abstracted in several databases including Environmental Abstracts, Fuel and Energy Abstracts, Social Sciences Citation Index, GEOBASE, Social & Behavioral Sciences, Journal of Economic Literature, INSPEC, and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信